Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-21
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients with hip fractures who require surgery are traditionally given injectable blood thinners to help prevent blood clots; however, these medications are costly, may not be tolerated well, and can be difficult to take, as prescribed. Oral blood thinning medications are being used more commonly, but it is unknown which of these medications is the most effective in preventing blood clots in patients after a hip fracture.
Thrombelastography (TEG) technology uses a small sample of blood to evaluate a person's clotting ability. Our research has used TEG technology to evaluate blood clotting risk after hip fracture surgery and the investigators have found that platelets may play an important role in abnormal blood clotting after a hip fracture. The investigators have also shown that acetylsalicylic acid (ASA or Aspirin) may help reduce the abnormal platelet hyperactivity associated with blood clotting. This medication warrants investigation for blood clot prevention after hip fracture.
The investigators propose to directly compare different oral medication regimens after hip fracture surgery, in order to determine which is safest and most effective in preventing blood clots. Our multi-disciplinary research team includes physicians, surgeons, and scientists with experience evaluating different medications for blood clot prevention. Our results will help determine the best medical treatment for preventing DVT and PE, which will benefit patients with hip fractures worldwide.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hip Fracture Surgery Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Prevention
NCT07228663
Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Comparing Rivaroxaban to Aspirin Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01720108
Japanese Safety and Efficacy Study of Enoxaparin in Patients With Hip Fracture Surgery
NCT00685958
Thromboprophylaxis With Rivaroxaban In Patients With Malignancy and Central Venous Lines
NCT03506815
Pilot Study Evaluating Alterations in Thrombogenicity and Platelet Reactivity Following Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
NCT01809054
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
With over 30,000 hip fractures in Canada annually, these injuries are an epidemic. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events are common following hip fracture surgery (HFS) and include life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE; a leading cause of preventable mortality) and debilitating deep vein thromboses (DVTs; second most common complication). Thromboprophylaxis reduces VTE, but the optimal medication remains unknown.
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the mainstay, but adherence is poor: only 1 in 5 patients adhere after HFS, limiting its effectiveness. Meta-analyses support that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective as LMWH in prevention of VTE, but the data are limited by borderline effect sizes, small sample sizes, and inconsistent outcomes. Our survey found that surgeons report safety concerns and are reluctant to use DOACs due to post-operative bleeding risk.
Our research demonstrates platelet-dominant hypercoagulability using serial thrombelastography (TEG), reduced platelet activity with aspirin (ASA) use, and maybe increasing comfort with prescribing ASA post-HFS. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LMWH and ASA post-injury are limited by non-standardized therapy duration, asymptomatic DVT inclusion, and patient heterogeneity. ASA has been favourably compared to DOACs and LMWH in arthroplasty RCTs examining oral thromboprophylaxis following total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Continued morbidity and mortality, patient and surgeon preference, and our network meta-analysis support the need for comparison between DOAC and ASA for VTE prevention after HFS. Based on our research, our resent network meta-analysis supporting oral thromboprophylaxis, along with patient preference for oral medications, there is a need for comparison between DOAC and ASA for prevention of VTE to reduce the continued morbidity and mortality that ensues following HFS.
2. Objectives:
Specific Aims:
1. Feasibility: This pilot trial will evaluate the feasibility of a full-scale RCT comparing the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban versus ASA for thromboprophylaxis after HFS, based on achieving recruitment targets, study drug adherence, and participant retention.
2. Safety and Efficacy: Key clinical data will be collected to estimate VTE and bleeding complications to inform the full-scale RCT.
(3) Methods:
This is a multi-centre double-blind pilot trial consisting of consecutive eligible patients 50 years or older requiring HFS who will be randomized (1:1) via web-based randomization to rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for 35 days or ASA 81 mg daily for 35 days, with 90-day follow-up. The primary feasibility outcome measure is an estimate of the mean monthly recruitment rate over 12 months across participating sites, including 95% confidence intervals, with a priori feasibility criteria determining progression to the full trial. Secondary feasibility outcomes are consent and retention rates, and drug adherence.
Secondary clinical outcomes will include symptomatic VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and 90-day mortality (independently and blindly adjudicated). Intention-to-treat analysis will be used, and subgroup analysis will compare age, sex, gender, and surgical type. Additional patient-reported (the Cumulated Ambulation Score and Clinical Frailty Scale), value-based (direct and indirect costs) and translational (coagulation) outcomes will be included.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rivaroxaban 10mg
Rivaroxaban 10mg daily for 35 days post hip fracture surgery
Rivaroxaban 10mg
Rivaroxaban 10mg daily for 35 days post hip fracture surgery
acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81mg daily
acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81mg daily for 35 days post hip fracture surgery
acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81mg Oral Tablet
acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81mg daily for 35 days post hip fracture surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rivaroxaban 10mg
Rivaroxaban 10mg daily for 35 days post hip fracture surgery
acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81mg Oral Tablet
acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 81mg daily for 35 days post hip fracture surgery
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age ≥ 50 years with a hip fracture (AO-OTA classification 31-A1-A3 and 31-B1-B3) amenable to surgical treatment (presentation to hospital within 24 hours of injury). Patients with additional injuries will be included and any additional injuries will be documented.
2. Both open and closed fractures will be included, and open fractures will be documented.
3. Patients on single agent anti-platelet therapy (i.e., acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel) will be included.
4. Signed informed consent or surrogate consent to participate in study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pathological fractures secondary to primary cancer or metastatic bone disease.
3. Peri-prosthetic femur fractures.
4. Received more than two doses of any thromboprophylaxis agent post-operatively, prior to randomization.
5. Pre-hospital therapeutic intensity antithrombotic therapy, including LMWH, Warfarin, DOACs, clopidogrel/ticagrelor, or chronic ASA use of any dose in the three months prior to hip fracture.
6. Known inherited bleeding or clotting disorder (factor V Leiden gene mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, protein C or protein S deficiency, antithrombin deficiency).
7. Intracranial hemorrhage requiring serial CT scans of the brain and/or surgical intervention.
8. Contraindication to ASA use (allergy, documented gastrointestinal ulcer within the past year, severe thrombocytopenia \[platelet count \<50 x109/L at the time of hospital admission\]).
9. Contraindication to rivaroxaban use (allergy, acute renal failure \[CrCl \<30 mL/min\]).
10. Participant or surrogate unable to or unwilling to provide consent or complete follow-up. Or surrogate consent not available.
11. Under age 50 years (more likely high energy, multiple injuries).
12. Multiply injured patients who require prolonged thromboprophylaxis or delayed thromboprophylaxis initiation.
13. Patient unable to attend follow-up visits.
14. Currently incarcerated, at a correctional facility.
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prism S Schneider, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Royal Columbian Hospital
New Westminster, British Colombia, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB22-1085
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.