A Talus Implant in Patients Between 20-60 Years of Age Followed up for a Minimum of 2 Years After Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06932380
Last Updated: 2025-04-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2030-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oxford Partial Knee Replacement. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Three Implant Types
NCT00679120
A Prospective, Post-Market, Clinical Follow-up Study of the Incompass™ Total Ankle System
NCT07118501
Prospective 2-year Data Collection of the First 10 Patients After Ankle Spacer Implantation
NCT04297449
Investigation of a Customized Femoral Resurfacing Implant
NCT01690689
Regeneration of Knee and Ankle Cartilage From Autologous Cartilage Mini-grafts (From the Patient's Own Cells)
NCT06897098
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The implant may represent a significant advancement in orthopedic surgery and has the potential to improve the quality of life for patients suffering from ankle joint injuries and osteochondral lesions.
In conjunction with the introduction of this method and implant, particularly in younger patients, the investigators aim to conduct a pilot study on the early outcomes of the first ten patients, focusing on safety, feasibility, and efficacy.
This project aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes in patients aged 20 to 60 years with challenging cartilage injuries in the ankle, two years postoperatively following implantation of a custom-made talus implant. The study focuses on safety, feasibility, and efficacy. Complications and adverse events will be recorded.
Clinical function will be assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, a well-validated and reliable scoring system, while HRQoL will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L score.
Ten patients with osteochondral lesions will be included in the study. Patients will be selected from a clinical population with moderate to severe symptoms and will be treated at an orthopedic clinic (DS) with expertise in managing ankle osteoarthritis/cartilage injuries and performing the talus implant implantation. Through this recruitment process, the investigators aim to establish a cohort that reasonably reflects the patient population with ankle osteoarthritis at our clinic, thereby enhancing the quality and relevance of the research.
Upon inclusion, patients will undergo a clinical examination, X-ray, and MRI imaging of the foot to assess the extent of the injury and joint geometry. The Berndt-Harty classification system will be used to categorize the injury based on radiographic images, and the Bristol-Hepple classification will be employed to describe lesion size, edema, displacement, and cyst formation based on MRI images. Patients will undergo implantation of the talus implant performed by a qualified orthopedic surgical team. Pre- and postoperative pain management protocols will be implemented. Standard postoperative follow-up plans, including rehabilitation and physiotherapy, will be provided. Patients will be followed up clinically at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.
Additional data collected include: Demographic data: Age, sex, surgical time (minutes).
Clinical data: Time of diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment type, and treatment course.
Patients will be informed about the study and will provide written consent before inclusion. To ensure ethical and legal informed consent, patients will receive a detailed consent form explaining the nature of the study, what participation entails, and how patient data will be managed to protect confidentiality. Only after obtaining written consent will patients be included in the study.
In this study, the power calculation is challenged by a limited patient sample, which affects the potential for statistical significance. With a single cohort of 10 patients over a two-year period, the sample size restricts the ability to detect statistically significant differences in AOFAS and EQ-5D-5L scores. Reduced statistical power is an inherent consequence of the small sample size. The results, primarily descriptive and exploratory, must be interpreted with caution and regarded as a foundation for further research. Alternative analytical approaches will be considered to maximize the value of the collected data.
The following data processing and statistical analysis methods are planned:
* Descriptive statistics to summarize demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of participants.
* T-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare pre- and postoperative outcomes on continuous variables such as pain (NRS), AOFAS scores, and HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L), depending on data distribution.
* ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests for comparisons across multiple time points or groups.
* Linear regression models to analyze relationships between predictors (e.g., age, sex, injury severity) and outcome variables (e.g., pain, function, HRQoL).
* Calculation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for EQ-5D-5L to establish the smallest score change perceived as clinically meaningful by patients.
* Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to estimate revision rates over time.
* Cox proportional hazards models to assess risk factors for potential implant revisions. A detailed analysis plan will be developed before data collection begins to ensure that the study has sufficient power to detect any significant differences or associations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Talus prosthesis
This study consists of a single-arm intervention evaluating the Episurf Episealer talus implant in patients with symptomatic osteochondral lesions of the ankle. All included patients will undergo open surgical implantation of the patient-specific cobalt-chromium implant, designed to restore joint congruency and improve function. Standardized postoperative care, including rehabilitation and follow-up assessments at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, will be provided. Primary outcomes include revision rate and complication incidence, while secondary measures assess pain, functional improvement, and health-related quality of life.
Talus prosthesis
The Episealer Talus is an individualised resurfacing implant intended for use on either the medial or lateral talus. It aims to treat patients suffering from pain and reduced mobility due to focal osteochondral lesions in the talus.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Talus prosthesis
The Episealer Talus is an individualised resurfacing implant intended for use on either the medial or lateral talus. It aims to treat patients suffering from pain and reduced mobility due to focal osteochondral lesions in the talus.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a limited cartilage defect that qualifies for Episealer implantation.
* Patients who have provided written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with extensive cartilage damage where Episealer is not indicated.
* Patients with osteoarthritic changes on the tibial side of the ankle joint.
* Patients with severe joint instability.
* Patients with severe neurological or systemic diseases.
* Patients who smoke.
* Patients with substance abuse issues.
* Patients unable to attend follow-ups due to distance or other factors.
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Drammen Sykehus
Drammen, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24/09300-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.