Lung Ultrasound for Guiding Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Pneumonia
NCT ID: NCT06921993
Last Updated: 2025-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
659 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-05
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Commonly used chest X-rays have limitations such as low sensitivity, moderate interobserver reliability, and the inability to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia. In contrast, lung ultrasound has shown high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing pneumonia in children. However, lung ultrasound also cannot reliably distinguish between bacterial and viral causes and might lead to increased antibiotic prescriptions by detecting minor lung consolidations not seen on chest X-rays. Despite these issues, lung ultrasound is widely used in pediatric pulmonary assessment.
The primary objective of the study is to determine if using lung ultrasound for diagnosing pneumonia in children can reduce antibiotic prescriptions compared to the standard care approach-which mainly relies on clinical diagnosis (often supplemented by chest X-ray and blood tests in selected cases). The secondary objective is to assess how frequently lung ultrasound impacts management decisions during a single clinical visit, beyond the information provided by history and physical examination. The third objective is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound-supported diagnosis with existing diagnostic methods.
The study hypothesizes that lung ultrasound results can act as a decision modifier, similar to other clinical tools and examination findings. However, a lack of consensus on specific lung ultrasound parameters and their clinical correlations contributes to variability in managing suspected pneumonia, potentially leading to antibiotic overuse.
Eligible participants are children aged three to ten years who are in good general condition and clinically stable, presenting with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection indicative of pneumonia. Exclusion criteria include children outside the specified age range, those recently hospitalized, those who have undergone prior chest imaging, those already on antibiotic therapy, those with severe clinical instability, and those with underlying conditions predisposing them to severe or recurrent pneumonia. These criteria help ensure that the study population represents general pediatric community-acquired pneumonia cases, avoiding biases from high-risk patients.
The ultimate goal of this study is to provide evidence on whether lung ultrasound can serve as a reliable tool to guide antibiotic prescriptions, thereby reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the management of pediatric pneumonia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combined Diagnostic Approach for Refractory Mycoplasma Pneumonia in Children
NCT07064278
Supportive Treatment and Antibiotics for Mild Pediatric Pneumonia
NCT05726253
Comparison Between Amoxycillin/Clavulanic Acid and Oxacillin/Ceftriaxone for Community Acquired-pneumonia
NCT01166932
The Norwegian Antibiotics for Pneumonia in Children Study
NCT03446534
Procalcitonin to Reduce Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Pneumonia
NCT04963764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Design and Intervention
Children presenting with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection (e.g., cough, tachypnea, fever) who are clinically stable and in good general condition are eligible.
Exclusion criteria include recent hospitalization, prior imaging, ongoing antibiotic therapy, severe respiratory distress, and underlying conditions predisposing to complicated pneumonia.
Participants are randomized to an experimental group, where LUS is performed immediately after clinical assessment, or a control group, which follows standard care.
Clinicians in both groups may request a chest X-ray if warranted, and the reasons for imaging are documented.
All participants receive routine evaluations, and interventions (e.g., blood tests, antibiotic decisions) remain at the discretion of the treating physician.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome: Reduction in antibiotic prescriptions in the LUS group versus the control group.
Secondary Outcomes:
The rate at which LUS modifies diagnoses and clinical management compared to assessments using only history and physical examination.
Differences in emergency department (ED) length of stay, hospital admission rates, and unscheduled healthcare visits within one week.
Overall diagnostic accuracy of LUS-supported diagnosis compared to standard methods.
Additional Measures:
An expert panel (pediatric radiologist, pulmonologist, and emergency physician) will determine a consensus final diagnosis after reviewing clinical data.
Data Management and Follow-Up
Each patient's care pathway is documented using a 1-5 Likert scale capturing the likelihood of pneumonia and willingness to prescribe antibiotics at various decision points (clinical exam, optional LUS, and optional chest X-ray).
A follow-up call occurs 5-7 days post-discharge to track clinical progress and any subsequent antibiotic use.
Data are recorded and stored in REDCap, with pseudonymized patient identifiers.
No significant risks are anticipated. The benefits include potentially improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions.
Ultimately, this study seeks to clarify whether incorporating LUS into standard pediatric pneumonia assessment can enhance decision-making, leading to more judicious antibiotic use without compromising patient care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group - standard of care
All subjects randomly assigned to the control arm will undergo a complete patient history and clinical assessment (the reference standard). If there is clinical uncertainty, the enrolling physician has the option to perform other test such as CXR or blood test.
No interventions assigned to this group
Experimental Group - Lung Ultrasound (LUS)
All subjects randomly assigned to the investigational arm will undergo lung ultrasound (LUS) . The LUS will be performed immediately following a thorough patient history and complete clinical assessment.
Ultrasound still images and ultrasound clips will be acquired according to the study protocol. Detailed methodology of the ultrasound examination and parameters is provided as appendix to the study protocol
LUNG ULTRASOUND
All subjects randomly assigned to the investigational arm will undergo lung ultrasound (LUS) .
Ultrasound still images and ultrasound clips will be acquired according to the study protocol. Detailed methodology of the ultrasound examination and parameters is provided as appendix to the study protocol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LUNG ULTRASOUND
All subjects randomly assigned to the investigational arm will undergo lung ultrasound (LUS) .
Ultrasound still images and ultrasound clips will be acquired according to the study protocol. Detailed methodology of the ultrasound examination and parameters is provided as appendix to the study protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Respiratory Symptoms: Cough, Tachypnea, Dyspnea (Increased work of breathing), Abnormal findings on auscultation.
2. Systemic Symptoms: Fever, Hypoxia, Decreased appetite.
Exclusion Criteria
* Children aged 3 to 10 years with any of the following factors:
1. Recent hospitalization (within the past 14 days)
2. Prior CXR or any other chest imaging (e.g. CT scan)
3. Ongoing antibiotic therapy
4. Hemodynamic instability
5. Respiratory failure or severe respiratory distress and/or hypoxemia, requiring urgent assessment for conditions such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, or other emergency respiratory conditions
6. History of aspiration or ab ingestis pneumonia
7. Underlying medical conditions predisposing to severe or recurrent pneumonia, including immunodeficiency, chronic corticosteroid use, chronic lung disease, malignancy, sickle cell disease, congenital heart disease, tracheostomy, and neuromuscular disorders affecting respiration
3 Years
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione C.N.R./Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Pisa, Italy
OTHER_GOV
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
OTHER
Gaslini Children's Hospital
OTHER
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
OTHER
University Hospital Padova
OTHER
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Università degli Studi 'G. d'Annunzio' Chieti e Pescara
OTHER
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute
OTHER
Santobono-Pausilpon Hospital
UNKNOWN
Asst Degli Spedali Civili Di Brescia
OTHER
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
OTHER
Clinica Pediatrica Università di Novara
UNKNOWN
Hospital of Prato
OTHER
Columbia University
OTHER
Schneider Children's Medical Center, Israel
OTHER
Yale University
OTHER
University of Melbourne
OTHER
Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Niccolò Parri, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS
Florence, Italy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LUSCAP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.