A Comparative Evaluation of Different Histopathological Indices of Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis
NCT ID: NCT06918093
Last Updated: 2025-04-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-06-30
2027-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* To compare the findings of the three histopathological indices with each other as a trial to select the best, reproducible, easily and consistently applied system that could be adopted in routine pathological evaluation. Moreover, an attempt to introduce a novel customized method of histopathological evaluation could be carried out.
* To correlate the clinical and endoscopic follow up data of patient on treatment with the histopathological evaluation. This will be done in order to evaluate the possible predictive effect of histopathological evaluation on the disease course and hence as a tool to drive possible modification of the therapeutic choices
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hematological Indices and Fecal Calprotectin Predict Histological Remission in Ulcerative Colitis
NCT04818788
Predictive Factors of Endoscopic Mucosal Healing in Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis
NCT02640391
The Diversity of the Fungal and Bacterial in Colon Mucosa of Patients With Different Degree of Inflammation of Ulcerative Colitis
NCT03151850
A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study on the Clinical Prognosis of Ulcerative Colitis
NCT03698812
Assessment of Disease Activity in Ulcerative Colitis by Endoscopic Ultrasound
NCT01852760
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While treatment of patients with UC is primarily aiming to achieve clinical remission (CR) and endoscopic remission (ER), there is now interest in targeting histological healing (HH) in addition to CR, as symptoms may not reliably correlate with histological activity. Moreover, ER is not always an accurate indicator of histological healing. Furthermore, histological changes tend to lag behind CR after treatment. Accordingly, histological remission may be considered as an independent predictor of clinical relapse better than endoscopic appearances.
The Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) II committee introduced a treat-to-target approach and proposed that the therapeutic target in UC should include clinical and patient-reported outcome remission, alongside endoscopic remission, with Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0. Histologic remission is not a formal target of medical therapy, but it is considered an "adjunct to endoscopic remission to represent a deeper level of healing.
However, Various studies have elucidated that histologic remission serves as a distinct treatment objective from endoscopic remission, offering a superior prediction of clinical remission. In few studies, histological remission seems to correlate with long-term clinical remission, better clinical outcomes, and a lower risk of intestinal dysplasia, even though significant data are still lacking.
Currently, about 30 histologic scoring systems in UC have been described and used for quantitative assessment, but 3 have recently undergone scientific validation namely the Gobeos score (GS), Nancy Index (NI) and Robarts Histopathologic Index (RHI). For histologic measurements of disease activity to affect clinical decision making, pathologists should agree upon which standardized features to report and the definitions of these parameters.
GS evaluates all aspects of mucosal injury seen in UC including crypt architecture, lamina propria chronic inflammation, lamina propria eosinophils, lamina propria neutrophils, intraepithelial neutrophils, crypt destruction, and surface epithelial injury.
The RHI was developed based on several reproducible features included in the final index (lamina propria chronic inflammation, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in the epithelium, and surface epithelial injury). Although the RHI was specifically designed to be responsive and reproducible, it requires assessment of 4 features to arrive at a calculated score, which may reduce its clinical usefulness.
The NI is a stepwise 5-item index that evaluates lamina propria chronic inflammation (defined as lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils), neutrophilic inflammation, and ulcers.
It is unclear which of these histologic scoring indices is most useful in clinical practice. In this context, it is important that pathologists to include important, reproducible histologic features in a pathology report that could be correlated better with clinical management. In addition, the development and validation of novel histologic scoring systems, better correlate with CR and ER, should be tried out.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aya Mahmoud Mohamed
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thanaa Sotouhy, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marchal-Bressenot A, Salleron J, Boulagnon-Rombi C, Bastien C, Cahn V, Cadiot G, Diebold MD, Danese S, Reinisch W, Schreiber S, Travis S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Development and validation of the Nancy histological index for UC. Gut. 2017 Jan;66(1):43-49. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310187. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Jauregui-Amezaga A, Geerits A, Das Y, Lemmens B, Sagaert X, Bessissow T, Lobaton T, Ferrante M, Van Assche G, Bisschops R, Geboes K, De Hertogh G, Vermeire S. A Simplified Geboes Score for Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Mar 1;11(3):305-313. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw154.
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Arenson E, Rubin DT, Siegel CA, Lee S, Stephen Laroux F, Zhou W, Finney-Hayward T, Sanchez Gonzalez Y, Shields AL. A Comparative Evaluation of the Measurement Properties of Three Histological Indices of Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis: Geboes Score, Robarts Histopathology Index and Nancy Index. J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Nov 24;17(11):1733-1743. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad087.
Le Berre C, Honap S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet. 2023 Aug 12;402(10401):571-584. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00966-2.
Magro F, Estevinho MM, Valois A. Managing Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: Should the Target Be Endoscopy, Histology, or Both? J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 23;7(1):46-58. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwad034. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Pai RK, Khanna R, D'Haens GR, Sandborn WJ, Jeyarajah J, Feagan BG, Vande Casteele N, Jairath V. Definitions of response and remission for the Robarts Histopathology Index. Gut. 2019 Nov;68(11):2101-2102. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317547. Epub 2018 Oct 26. No abstract available.
Shehab M, Al Akram S, Hassan A, Alrashed F, Jairath V, Bessissow T. Histological Disease Activity as Predictor of Clinical Relapse, Hospitalization, and Surgery in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2024 Apr 3;30(4):563-572. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad119.
Turner D, Ricciuto A, Lewis A, D'Amico F, Dhaliwal J, Griffiths AM, Bettenworth D, Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Reinisch W, Scholmerich J, Bemelman W, Danese S, Mary JY, Rubin D, Colombel JF, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Dotan I, Abreu MT, Dignass A; International Organization for the Study of IBD. STRIDE-II: An Update on the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) Initiative of the International Organization for the Study of IBD (IOIBD): Determining Therapeutic Goals for Treat-to-Target strategies in IBD. Gastroenterology. 2021 Apr;160(5):1570-1583. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.031. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UC STUDY
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.