Assessment of Disease Activity in Ulcerative Colitis by Endoscopic Ultrasound
NCT ID: NCT01852760
Last Updated: 2015-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-09-30
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Responsiveness of Endoscopic Evaluation in UC
NCT01960439
Service Development of POCUS in the IBD Clinic
NCT05838196
Comparison Between Bowel Ultrasound-based Treat to Target Versus Routine Treat to Target Strategies in Ulcerative Colitis
NCT05735665
Automatic Evaluation of Inflammation Activity in Ulcerative Colitis Using pCLE With Artificial Intelligence
NCT04131530
Contrast-enhanced Bowel Ultrasound in Making a Diagnosis and Follow-up of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
NCT03744130
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This notion of "individualizing" therapy is attractive and a distinct departure from the current "step-care" paradigm in which treatments are added sequentially on the basis of symptom-defined treatment failure. However, for this paradigm to be implementable an objective means of accurately stratifying risk must be identified and validated. Accordingly, increased interest has evolved in the use of biomarkers as prognostic tools. Although fecal calprotectin and serum CRP are potential candidates for this role, these tests have limitations.
Transabdominal ultrasound (US) has been used in the diagnostic workup of IBD. US was a good surrogate of disease activity when compared to colonoscopy, but is unable to reliably assess the rectal wall which tends to cause the most symptoms in UC. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a highly accurate diagnostic modality for the assessment of rectal pathology. However, the role of EUS in IBD is not well defined. Tsuga et al showed total wall thickness to be highly predictive for acute inflammation in patients with UC compared to healthy controls and that the degree of rectal wall involvement correlated with endoscopic severity. Higaki et al showed patients with quiescent UC who relapsed had initial sonographic evidence of "deep" disease activity shown by significantly greater baseline thickness of the first 3 layers of the rectal wall. Yoshizawa et al subsequently demonstrated that inflammation reaching the muscularis propria or deeper predicted the need for colectomy. Hurlstone et al correlated EUS scores with histopathology, endoscopic, and clinical scores and found good concordance to only exist with superficial EUS scores. In all of these studies the investigators who performed the EUS analysis did so with knowledge of the endoscopy scores. This questions the validity of these results due to the potential for bias. Another parameter that shows promise for evaluation of inflammatory burden is EUS evaluation of blood flow. Surprisingly, Doppler flow has not been used to assess bowel wall vascularity in UC with EUS. We believe that assessment of vascularity has the potential to differentiate with a high degree of accuracy active from quiescent disease.
Although the existing literature indicates that EUS has potential as an evaluative and prognostic tool the investigators believe that a great deal of additional research is needed to further develop this technology. This study will correlate Doppler EUS and other EUS indices with validated clinical, endoscopic, and histological indices of UC inflammation to assess its utility as a diagnostic tool. It will assess the reproducibility of these indices by calculating inter and intra-observer agreement by blinded expert reviewers. This information may have prognostic importance and might ultimately be used to guide therapy in individual patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
UC in Remission
Patients with UC in remission
No interventions assigned to this group
UC Mild Disease
Patients with mild UC disease activity based on partial Mayo Score
No interventions assigned to this group
UC Moderate to severe
Patients with ulcerative colitis with moderate to severe disease activity based on partial Mayo score
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients termed either "active" or "inactive" UC
* Patients may be treatment naïve (ie: new diagnosis) or on existing therapy including 5'ASA (oral or topical), AZA, corticosteroids, or IFX
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to provide informed consent
* Crohn's disease 4. Presence of an ileoanal pouch
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
OTHER
University of Western Ontario, Canada
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
University of Toronto
OTHER
Dalhousie University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brian Yan
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian Yan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Western University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Joseph's Health Care
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Parente F, Molteni M, Marino B, Colli A, Ardizzone S, Greco S, Sampietro G, Foschi D, Gallus S. Are colonoscopy and bowel ultrasound useful for assessing response to short-term therapy and predicting disease outcome of moderate-to-severe forms of ulcerative colitis?: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1150-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.672. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
Tsuga K, Haruma K, Fujimura J, Hata J, Tani H, Tanaka S, Sumii K, Kajiyama G. Evaluation of the colorectal wall in normal subjects and patients with ulcerative colitis using an ultrasonic catheter probe. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Nov;48(5):477-84. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70088-4.
Higaki S, Nohara H, Saitoh Y, Akazawa A, Yanai H, Yoshida T, Okita K. Increased rectal wall thickness may predict relapse in ulcerative colitis: a pilot follow-up study by ultrasonographic colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2002 Mar;34(3):212-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-20293.
Yoshizawa S, Kobayashi K, Katsumata T, Saigenji K, Okayasu I. Clinical usefulness of EUS for active ulcerative colitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Feb;65(2):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.10.037.
Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Lobo AJ, McAlindon ME, Cross SS. Prospective evaluation of high-frequency mini-probe ultrasound colonoscopic imaging in ulcerative colitis: a valid tool for predicting clinical severity. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Dec;17(12):1325-31. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200512000-00010.
D'Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Geboes K, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ, Lemann M, Marteau P, Rutgeerts P, Scholmerich J, Sutherland LR. A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007 Feb;132(2):763-86. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.038. Epub 2006 Dec 20. No abstract available.
Travis SP, Schnell D, Krzeski P, Abreu MT, Altman DG, Colombel JF, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB, Lemann M, Lichtenstein GR, Marteau PR, Reinisch W, Sands BE, Yacyshyn BR, Bernhardt CA, Mary JY, Sandborn WJ. Developing an instrument to assess the endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis: the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). Gut. 2012 Apr;61(4):535-42. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300486. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Geboes K, Riddell R, Ost A, Jensfelt B, Persson T, Lofberg R. A reproducible grading scale for histological assessment of inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2000 Sep;47(3):404-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.3.404.
Kornbluth A, Sachar DB; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults (update): American College of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jul;99(7):1371-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40036.x.
Lichtenstein GR, Abreu MT, Cohen R, Tremaine W; American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2006 Mar;130(3):940-87. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.048. No abstract available.
Langhorst J, Elsenbruch S, Koelzer J, Rueffer A, Michalsen A, Dobos GJ. Noninvasive markers in the assessment of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases: performance of fecal lactoferrin, calprotectin, and PMN-elastase, CRP, and clinical indices. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;103(1):162-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01556.x. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
Yan B, Feagan B, Teriaky A, Mosli M, Mohamed R, Williams G, Yeung E, Yong E, Haig A, Sey M, Stitt L, Zou GY, Jairath V. Reliability of EUS indices to detect inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):1079-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.035. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UWO103563
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.