Comparison Between Bowel Ultrasound-based Treat to Target Versus Routine Treat to Target Strategies in Ulcerative Colitis
NCT ID: NCT05735665
Last Updated: 2023-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
250 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-03
2025-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Consensus guidelines recommend to go beyond resolution of clinical symptoms and achieve endoscopic remission. This long-term treatment goal in UC is commonly defined by a Mayo endoscopic subscore \< 13, and is associated with prolonged clinical remission, lower rates of hospitalization and lower rates of colectomy. However, colonoscopy is an invasive and expensive procedure, unpleasant to patients, not without risks, especially during severe flares. Moreover, CS is time-consuming and expensive for the Healthcare System.
Clinical symptoms correlate well with endoscopic findings, and their improvement together to normalization of FC, are currently considered the short-term and intermediate-term targets to achieve. However, while asymptomatic patients with FC \< 50 mcg/g have \< 5% probability to have endoscopic lesions, and conversely patients with evident rectal bleeding and persistent increased stool frequency (\> 3 stools above baseline) with FC \> 250 mcg/g have less than 5% chance to have endoscopic remission, in patients in the intermediate scenarios with stool frequency score (SFS) 2 or 3 or rectal bleeding score (RBS) \> 0, with FC values between 50 and 250 mcg/g, the uncertainty increases and CS should not be avoided.
Bowel US is a well-tolerated, non-invasive, patient friendly, cheap, easy-to-use tool to manage UC patients in clinical practice8. In addition, its ability to be performed as point-of-care bowel US may drastically change frequency of the assessment of treatment response, speeding the clinical decision-making process9. Recently, the investigators developed and externally validated non-invasive ultrasonography based criteria \[Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC)\] to assess and grade endoscopic activity in UC10,11. The investigators also confirmed that a MUC score \> 6.2 is a valid cut-off to discriminate endoscopic activity, defined by a Mayo endoscopic subscore \> 1 Bowel US is a well-tolerated, non-invasive, patient friendly, cheap, easy-to-use tool to manage UC patients in clinical practice. In addition, its ability to be performed as point-of-care bowel US may drastically change frequency of the assessment of treatment response, speeding the clinical decision-making process. Recently, the investigators developed and externally validated non-invasive ultrasonography based criteria \[Milan ultrasound criteria (MUC)\] to assess and grade endoscopic activity in UC14,15. The investigators also confirmed that a MUC score \> 6.2 is a valid cut-off to discriminate endoscopic activity, defined by a Mayo endoscopic subscore \> 1.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Disease Activity in Ulcerative Colitis by Endoscopic Ultrasound
NCT01852760
Role of Intestinal Ultrasound in Treat to Target Strategy in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease : the IUS-TTT Study
NCT06534216
Comparative Outcomes of Ulcerative Colitis Patients With Mayo Endoscopic Score 1 and Histologic Activity Versus Mayo Endoscopic Score 2
NCT07188727
Quantitative Assessment of Intestinal Motility on Bowel Ultrasound in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Feasibility, Observational, Cross-sectional, Monocentric Study
NCT05719402
Multimodal Ultrasound in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
NCT05987501
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients seen at each participating center who are eligible for this study will be randomized 1:1 (computer generated randomization list) to enter one of two study arms up to Week 52:
1. study group: the bowel US-based treat to target arm
2. control group: the routine CS treat to target arm. At Week 52 ± 4, all patients in the two study arms will undergo CS, bowel US, PRO and FC as indicated for the screening phase.
Patients will be followed up and will undergo the study procedures as described below:
Bowel Ultrasound-based Treat to target arm At W12 ± 4 and W24 ± 4, subjects will perform FC and bowel US and PRO will be recorded.
If rectal bleeding \> 2 + stool frequency \> 2 AND FC \> 250 mcg/g AND/OR MUC \> 6.2, treatment will be changed according to the standard of care and international guidelines.
Routine CS Treat to target arm At W12 ± 4 and W24 ± 4, subjects will perform FC and PRO will be recorded for all patients.
If rectal bleeding \> 2 + stool frequency \> 2 AND FC \> 250 mcg/g, treatment will be changed according to the standard of care and guidelines. If rectal bleeding \> 0 + stool frequency \> 2 AND FC will be ≥ 50 mcg/g and ≤ 250 mcg/g, a RSS will be done in order to decide any treatment switch.
The routine CS treat-to-target arm schedule is based on the recommendations of the STRIDE II. When appropriate, based on the investigator's judgement, CS can be replaced by a RSS.
Since the two strategies are part of the standards of care, no additional procedures outside the current clinical practice will be used in this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
study group: the bowel Ultrasound-based treat to target arm
At W12 ± 4 and W24 ± 4, subjects will perform FC and bowel US and PRO will be recorded.
If rectal bleeding \> 2 + stool frequency \> 2 AND FC \> 250 mcg/g AND/OR MUC \> 6.2, treatment will be changed according to GCP and international guidelines.
bowel ultrasound
Bowel US is a non-invasive tool which is able to measure intestinal inflammation by the use of emission of US from a specific probe. It is used externally, just moving the probe on the skin of the patient along the abdominal section. It does not require any contrast. The preparation used is just a fasting period of 6 hours.
control group: the routine Colonoscopy treat to target arm.
At W12 ± 4 and W24 ± 4, subjects will perform FC and PRO will be recorded for all patients.
If rectal bleeding \> 2 + stool frequency \> 2 AND FC \> 250 mcg/g, treatment will be changed according to GCP and international guidelines. If rectal bleeding \> 0 + stool frequency \> 2 AND FC will be ≥ 50 mcg/g and ≤ 250 mcg/g, a RSS will be done in order to decide any treatment switch.
colonoscopy
Colonoscopy is an endoscopic procedure where a tube is inserted from the anus up to the ileum of the patient. It requires bowel cleansing with polyethilenglicole up to 4 liters (depending on the preparation and the desired grade of cleansing) the day before the examination. Because it may be painful, usually sedation is provided.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bowel ultrasound
Bowel US is a non-invasive tool which is able to measure intestinal inflammation by the use of emission of US from a specific probe. It is used externally, just moving the probe on the skin of the patient along the abdominal section. It does not require any contrast. The preparation used is just a fasting period of 6 hours.
colonoscopy
Colonoscopy is an endoscopic procedure where a tube is inserted from the anus up to the ileum of the patient. It requires bowel cleansing with polyethilenglicole up to 4 liters (depending on the preparation and the desired grade of cleansing) the day before the examination. Because it may be painful, usually sedation is provided.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Any gender/sex
* Active disease consistent with indication to start with systemic corticosteroids, biological agents or small molecules (defined as a patient-reported outcomes score, PRO \> 2)
* Ability to understand and to comply with the study procedure and sign an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with severe UC (defined as a Mayo global score \> 12, requiring hospitalization);
* Subjects with an endoscopic Mayo sub-score at baseline \<2;
* Subjects with a MUC at baseline \< 6.2;
* Pregnancy
* Subjects with any contraindication to any study procedure.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS San Raffaele
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mariangela Allocca
Gastroenterologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MARIANGELA ALLOCCA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS San Raffaele
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mariangela Allocca
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
T2T
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.