Food Challenge at Home or in Medical Practice - the FoodCHOMP Study

NCT ID: NCT06916819

Last Updated: 2025-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-16

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a pilot, multi-centre, randomised clinical trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of a home-based oral food challenge in adults with low-risk food allergy labels. Eligible participants are aged 18 years or older and have a self-reported food allergy with negative skin prick testing to the implicated food. Participants will be randomised to either a home-based or standard in-clinic food challenge. The primary aim is to determine the safety of home challenges, measured by the rate of immune-mediated adverse events. Secondary aims include feasibility of recruitment and delivery, protocol adherence, quality of life, and food reintroduction outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Food allergies are highly prevalent and contribute to significant patient anxiety and healthcare utilisation. Many individuals carry food allergy labels without confirmation through diagnostic food challenge, resulting in unnecessary food avoidance. In-clinic food challenges are the current standard for confirming tolerance but are resource-intensive and often delayed. This study evaluates whether selected low-risk adults can safely complete a structured oral food challenge at home.

This is a pilot, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial conducted at two tertiary allergy centres in Victoria, Australia (Austin Health and Royal Melbourne Hospital). Adults referred with a reported food allergy will undergo clinical assessment and skin prick testing. Those with negative skin testing (\<3mm wheal) to the implicated food and meeting other eligibility criteria will be randomised 1:1 to either:

* Intervention: Home-based oral food challenge over five days, beginning with a single supervised dose in-clinic and followed by four incremental doses at home with daily clinical follow-up.
* Control: Standard in-clinic oral food challenge using a protocol derived from PRACTALL and ASCIA guidelines.

The primary outcome is the proportion of participants experiencing an immune-mediated adverse event during food challenge. Secondary outcomes include feasibility metrics (eligibility, recruitment, delivery), non-immune mediated adverse events, protocol adherence, quality of life (measured by FAQLQ-12), time to challenge, and real-world food reintroduction.

The study will enrol 120 participants (60 per arm). Outcomes will inform the design of a future non-inferiority trial and may support integration of home challenges into routine practice for selected patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Food Allergies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study uses a parallel assignment model. Participants who meet eligibility criteria are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two arms: a home-based food challenge group (intervention) or a standard in-clinic food challenge group (control). Each participant undergoes only one of the two interventions, and there is no crossover between arms. Randomisation is stratified by site and gender and conducted via REDCap using a permuted block design.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

In-Clinic Food Challenge (Control Arm)

Participants randomised to the control arm will undergo a standard in-clinic oral food challenge conducted under direct medical supervision. The protocol used is derived from the PRACTALL consensus and ASCIA position statements and involves administration of increasing doses of the implicated food at 20-30 minute intervals over a 2-3 hour period. Observation continues for 1-2 hours post final dose. The challenge is performed in a hospital outpatient clinic equipped for anaphylaxis management. The food challenged is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

Group Type OTHER

In-Clinic Food Challenge

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Standard of care - Participants randomised to the control arm will undergo a standard in-clinic oral food challenge conducted under direct medical supervision. The protocol used is derived from the PRACTALL consensus and ASCIA position statements and involves administration of increasing doses of the implicated food at 20-30 minute intervals over a 2-3 hour period. Observation continues for 1-2 hours post final dose. The challenge is performed in a hospital outpatient clinic equipped for anaphylaxis management. The food challenged is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

Home-Based Food Challenge (Intervention Arm)

Participants randomised to the intervention arm will undertake a structured home-based oral food challenge over five consecutive days. This begins with an initial supervised dose administered in clinic under medical observation (60-minute monitoring period). Participants will then self-administer increasing doses of the implicated food at home each subsequent day using a standardised protocol adapted from PRACTALL and ASCIA guidelines. Dose intervals are 24 hours to reduce risk of cumulative reactions. Participants are provided with written instructions, emergency action plans, and have daily phone follow-up with allergy nursing staff during the challenge. The challenge food is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Home-Based Food Challenge

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participants randomised to the intervention arm will undertake a structured home-based oral food challenge over five consecutive days. This begins with an initial supervised dose administered in clinic under medical observation (60-minute monitoring period). Participants will then self-administer increasing doses of the implicated food at home each subsequent day using a standardised protocol adapted from PRACTALL and ASCIA guidelines. Dose intervals are 24 hours to reduce risk of cumulative reactions. Participants are provided with written instructions, emergency action plans, and have daily phone follow-up with allergy nursing staff during the challenge. The challenge food is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Home-Based Food Challenge

Participants randomised to the intervention arm will undertake a structured home-based oral food challenge over five consecutive days. This begins with an initial supervised dose administered in clinic under medical observation (60-minute monitoring period). Participants will then self-administer increasing doses of the implicated food at home each subsequent day using a standardised protocol adapted from PRACTALL and ASCIA guidelines. Dose intervals are 24 hours to reduce risk of cumulative reactions. Participants are provided with written instructions, emergency action plans, and have daily phone follow-up with allergy nursing staff during the challenge. The challenge food is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In-Clinic Food Challenge

Standard of care - Participants randomised to the control arm will undergo a standard in-clinic oral food challenge conducted under direct medical supervision. The protocol used is derived from the PRACTALL consensus and ASCIA position statements and involves administration of increasing doses of the implicated food at 20-30 minute intervals over a 2-3 hour period. Observation continues for 1-2 hours post final dose. The challenge is performed in a hospital outpatient clinic equipped for anaphylaxis management. The food challenged is selected by the participant from their eligible food allergy labels.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Negative (\<3mm) fresh or extract skin testing to the food implicated within their allergy label
2. Aged greater than 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of prior sensitisation to challenge food 0 Defined as previously positive skin testing or allergen specific IgEs if available
* Pregnancy
* Patients with poorly controlled asthma - defined as an ACQ5 scores \>1 at the time of enrolment
* Patients with a history of food reactions that is not-consistent with an IgE mediated process; i.e. exclusively gastrointestinal symptoms, FPIES
* Patients with a clear history of food-dependent exercise induced anaphylaxis
* Patients on a concurrent medication which may influence the outcome of the challenge;
* Antihistamine therapy; Patients receiving more than stress dose steroids (i.e. \> 50mg QID hydrocortisone \[or steroid equivalent\]); Omalizumab
* Any other illness that, in the investigator's judgement, will substantially increase the risk associated with subject's participation in this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Austin Health

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jack Godsell

Dr Jack Godsell, Clinical Immunologist and Allergist, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Austin Health

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Royal Melbourne Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jack Godsell

Role: primary

+613 9496 5000

Jack Godsell

Role: primary

61393427191

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

111750/Austin-2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Food Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
NCT04222491 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE2
Tolerance Following Peanut Oral Immunotherapy
NCT01750879 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Oral Immunotherapy for Wheat Allergy
NCT01980992 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Oral Immunotherapy in Young Children With Food Allergy
NCT05738798 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA