Assessment of the 1-year Relapse Rate in Patients with Pemphigus Treated According to the Revised Pemphigus PNDS

NCT ID: NCT06903494

Last Updated: 2025-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-17

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In May 2018, the PNDS (national diagnosis and care protocol) for pemphigus drawn up by the autoimmune bullous diseases reference centre was amended to take into account the results of recent studies and proposed, in line with the rituximab as 1st-line treatment: 1g repeated at 15-day intervals, then in the event of complete clinical remission, at 6 months: an infusion of 500mg or 1g in patients with initially severe pemphigus and/or who still have a high level of anti desmogleins at 3 months. The primary objective of the study is to prospectively evaluate the relapse rate during the first year of patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus treated according to the recommendations of the revised PNDS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pemphigus is a rare, potentially life-threatening autoimmune bullous disease affecting both the skin and mucous membranes in which pathogenic IgG antibodies are directed against desmosomal transmembrane desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3. The initial severity of lesions in pemphigus correlates with levels of serum anti-Dsg antibodies anti-Dsg 1 and anti-Dsg 3 serum antibody levels, respectively. High doses of oral corticosteroids (OCs), sometimes combined with immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) have been the mainstay of pemphigus treatment for many years for many years.

Over the last decade, more than 1,000 patients with recalcitrant or relapsing pemphigus have been treated pemphigus treated with rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) have been monoclonal antibody) have been reported in the literature.

The efficacy and safety of rituximab as a first-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe forms of pemphigus were recently evaluated in a large randomised controlled trial. Two predictive factors for early relapse that can be easily used in practice were identified, with a positive predictive value of 50% and a negative predictive value of 94% (initial PDAI severity score \>45 and anti-desmoglein 1 \>20 IU/ml and/or anti-desmoglein 3 \>130 IU/ml at M3 after the first rituximab infusion).

Thus, the probability of an early relapse in patients presenting at least one of these 2 clinico-immunological criteria is 50%, whereas the probability of not relapsing in patients with none of these criteria is 94%.

In May 2018, the PNDS (national diagnosis and care protocol) for pemphigus drawn up by the autoimmune bullous diseases reference centre was amended to take into account the results of recent studies and proposed, in line with the rituximab as 1st-line treatment: 1g repeated at 15-day intervals, then in the event of complete clinical remission, at 6 months: an infusion of 500mg or 1g in patients with initially severe pemphigus and/or who still have a high level of anti desmogleins at 3 months. The primary objective of the study is to prospectively evaluate the relapse rate during the first year of patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus treated according to the recommendations of the revised PNDS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dermatology Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pemphigus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Pemphigus newly diagnosed according to the following criteria:

* erosions and/or superficial cutaneous and/or mucosal bullae, suggestive of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) or pemphigus superficialis (PS)
* histological appearance of intraepidermal acantholysis
* IgG and/or C3 deposits on the keratinocyte membrane (after meshwork)
2. Patient who has been informed
3. Moderate to severe pemphigus (PDAI score \> 15), or mild pemphigus (PDAI score ≤ 15) that has not responded to the 1st line of treatment recommended in the NDSP (local corticosteroid therapy ± disulone) after three months.
4. Patient who has agreed to be monitored and treated according to the revised PNDS

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient âgé de moins de 18 ans
2. Diagnostic de Pemphigus (PV) ou (PS) restant incertain
3. Pemphigus paranéoplasique
4. Malade opposé à sa participation ou ne pouvant être suivi régulièrement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Rouen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pascal PJ JOLY, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Rouen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pascal

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A01312-37

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2020/144/OB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id