Comparison of the Immediate Effect of Passive vs. Passive-Active Hamstring Stretching on Flexibility in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT06888895

Last Updated: 2025-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-30

Study Completion Date

2028-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a combination of passive and active hamstring stretching (PAS) is more effective than passive stretching alone (PS) in improving flexibility in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does PAS lead to greater improvements in active flexibility compared to PS? Does PAS provide additional benefits in passive flexibility, hamstring stiffness, and pelvic tilt? Researchers will compare the PAS group and the PS group to see if combining passive and active stretching results in greater improvements in flexibility and movement control.

Participants will:

Perform either PAS or PS stretching exercises as assigned. Undergo measurements of flexibility, hamstring stiffness, and pelvic tilt before and after the intervention.

Answer a question about their perceived change in flexibility following the intervention.

This study aims to improve rehabilitation strategies for people with CLBP, helping them achieve better movement and pain relief.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are affected by deficits in hamstring flexibility and lumbopelvic neuromuscular control. While passive hamstring stretching immediately improves passive hamstring flexibility, no clinically important difference in active range of motion has been observed.

The primary objective of the present randomized controlled study protocol is to compare the immediate effects of a novel combination of passive and active stretching (PAS) exercises with passive hamstring stretching (PS) alone on active flexibility.

The secondary objectives include conducting a similar comparison for passive flexibility, hamstring stiffness, and pelvic tilt, as well as estimating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for hamstring flexibility measures. Ninety CLBP patients will be randomized into PAS or PS group and will receive respective interventions. Primary outcome will be the mean value of two measurements of Active Knee Extension taken before and immediately after the intervention. Secondary outcomes, Fingertip-to-Floor distance, Straight Leg Raise, hamstring stiffness and pelvic tilt will be recorded and compared in the same manner. A group-by-time comparison will be conducted for primary and secondary outcomes. An anchor question about perceived by participants change in flexibility following intervention will serve to estimate MCID.

This study protocol is the first opportunity to assess whether combining passive and active hamstring stretching is better than passive stretching alone for achieving an immediate and clinically important improvement in active flexibility among CLBP patients. The results will provide valuable and time-efficient insights for the development of more comprehensive rehabilitation programs in both clinical and research settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The same investigator will conduct both pre- and post-intervention assessments but will not be involved in administering the intervention for any patient, ensuring they remain blinded to patient allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Passive stretching (PS)

In the control group, participants will receive one minute of passive hamstring stretching applied three times for each lower limb, with a 30-second rest time between stretches. This ensures that the intervention time is consistent across both groups, totaling approximately 15-20 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Passive hamstring stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive one minute of passive hamstring stretching applied three times for each lower limb, with a 30-second rest time between stretches.

Passive-Active Stretching (PAS)

The passive-active stretching (PAS) intervention has two phases. In the first, a physiotherapist performs bilateral passive hamstring stretching, followed by a 30-second walk. The second phase includes three exercises with 30-second rest intervals between them.

Active Knee Extension: The participant lies on their back with one thigh vertical (hip at 90°). A Stabilizer® Pressure Bio-feedback device is placed behind the lumbar spine to help maintain neutral position. The participant maintains 40 mmHg pressure while extending the knee to its maximum. Ten repetitions with a 3-second hold are performed.

One-Leg Deadlift: While balancing on one leg, the participant bends forward and lifts the opposite leg, targeting hamstring elongation. Ten repetitions with a 5-second hold are performed.

Bear-Squat Exercise: Starting in all-fours, participants shift weight onto toes and hands, moving the pelvis backward to elongate the hamstrings. Ten repetitions are performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Passive-active stretching (PAS)

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive-active stretching (PAS) combines conventional passive stretching with active exercises designed to activate muscles that promote hamstring elongation. On the other hand, passive stretching (PS) is a commonly administered intervention to improve hamstring flexibility.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Passive-active stretching (PAS)

Passive-active stretching (PAS) combines conventional passive stretching with active exercises designed to activate muscles that promote hamstring elongation. On the other hand, passive stretching (PS) is a commonly administered intervention to improve hamstring flexibility.

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive hamstring stretching

Participants will receive one minute of passive hamstring stretching applied three times for each lower limb, with a 30-second rest time between stretches.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Passive stretching (PS)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients aged between 18 and 65 years
* Suffering from low-back pain for at least 3 months
* Presenting with hamstring flexibility deficit (Straight Leg Raise \<85°, Fingertip-to-Floor distance \>5 cm)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with radicular pain
* Disc inflammation (MODIC Type 1)
* Other relevant pathologies (neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, or oncological diseases)
* Significant surgical history (e.g., lumbar arthrodesis, knee or hip arthroplasty)
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Patients under protective legal measures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lech DOBIJA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clermont Ferrand Univbersity HOspital, Louise Michel site

Cébazat, France, France

Site Status RECRUITING

CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lise Laclautre

Role: CONTACT

334-73-754-963

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lech Dobija, PhD, PT

Role: primary

+33 4 73 75 08 39

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-A02351-46

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RBHP 2024 DOBIJA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.