Multicentric Case Series of Uniportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Decompression for Cervical Spinal Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT06886802
Last Updated: 2025-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-04-30
2027-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study evaluates a minimally invasive surgical approach called Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression as an alternative to traditional methods for patients with cervical spinal stenosis. The main objective is to assess changes in neurological deficits and disability related to cervical pain following this procedure. The study will also document hospitalization duration, surgical time, blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative complications.
This multicenter, prospective case series will recruit 50 patients from three medical centers in Mexico. Participants must have symptomatic cervical spinal stenosis that persists despite at least three months of conservative treatment. Eligible patients will undergo Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression, a technique that allows precise nerve decompression through a small incision, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues. Standardized clinical assessment tools, including the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, will be used to evaluate outcomes at multiple time points over 12 months.
By comparing patients' preoperative and postoperative evaluations, the study aims to determine whether Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression effectively improves neurological function and reduces disability while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Findings from this study could support the adoption of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques as a viable option for treating cervical spinal stenosis, potentially leading to faster recovery times and reduced surgical complications compared to traditional methods.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Correlation Between Parameters and Prognosis of Cervical Single Open-door Surgery
NCT05767164
Prospective Study for Delay in Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Central Cord Injury in Canal Stenosis
NCT02673320
Accuracy And Safety of Trans Pedicular Screw Fixation of The Sub-axial Cervical Spine Using A Triad- Dependent Technique
NCT05855642
Effects of Two Sub-occipital Techniques on Limited Mobility According to the Flexion-rotation Test
NCT02855216
Outpatient Posterior Cervical Fusion: Outcomes of the First 100 Consecutive Cases
NCT07242989
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study investigates the use of Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression, a minimally invasive surgical approach that offers targeted decompression through a single small incision while minimizing tissue disruption. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate changes in neurological deficits and disability related to cervical pain following this procedure. Secondary objectives include assessing the duration of hospitalization, surgical time, blood loss, and the incidence of postoperative complications.
This multicenter, prospective case series will recruit 50 patients diagnosed with cervical spinal stenosis at three medical institutions in Mexico. The study will be conducted over a period of 24 months, with an initial 12-month patient recruitment phase, followed by postoperative follow-up assessments at predetermined time intervals up to one year.
Participants will undergo Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression, a technique designed to preserve spinal mobility while reducing compression on the nerve roots. The procedure will be performed under general anesthesia with continuous neurophysiological monitoring, including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, and continuous electromyography. Using a working-channel endoscope, surgeons will perform foraminotomies or laminotomies to remove compressive elements such as osteophytes, hypertrophic ligaments, or herniated disc material. The technique is aimed at achieving decompression with minimal disruption to the surrounding soft tissues.
Patients must meet specific inclusion criteria, including an age range of 18 to 75 years, confirmed diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis (Kang classification grade I-III), and the presence of neurological symptoms unresponsive to at least three months of conservative management. Exclusion criteria include prior cervical surgery at the affected level, active infections, systemic inflammatory diseases, vertebral instability, congenital spinal malformations, and contraindications for general anesthesia.
Patient outcomes will be systematically evaluated using validated clinical assessment tools, including:
* Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Scale - to assess neurological function.
* Neck Disability Index (NDI) - to measure the impact of cervical pain on daily activities.
* Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain - to quantify cervical and upper limb pain intensity.
* EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire - to evaluate overall well-being.
* Modified MacNab Criteria - to determine patient satisfaction with surgical outcomes.
Descriptive statistical methods will be used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated using paired t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. The impact of the procedure on neurological function and pain relief will be assessed through longitudinal comparisons between baseline and follow-up assessments at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The incidence of complications will be categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the Comprehensive Complication Index will be used to quantify cumulative morbidity.
This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines, and national regulatory requirements. All participants will provide written informed consent before enrollment, and patient confidentiality will be maintained through data pseudonymization. The study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of the participating institutions.
The expected impact of this study is to generate clinical evidence supporting Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression as a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgical approaches for cervical spinal stenosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervical Spinal Stenosis Cases
Patients diagnosed with cervical spinal stenosis who exhibit persistent neurological deficits and pain despite receiving at least three months of conservative treatment. All participants have elected to undergo Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression. They are being prospectively followed to evaluate improvements in neurological function and reductions in pain-related disability, as well as to document perioperative outcomes including surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications.
Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression
Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression
Posterior Uniportal Endoscopic Cervical Decompression
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with cervical canal stenosis grade I-III according to the Kang scale.
* Radicular or myelopathic symptoms.
* Having undergone complete conservative management, including physical therapy and analgesia, for at least 3 months.
* Patients who have opted for posterior uniportal endoscopic cervical decompression for cervical canal stenosis.
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior cervical surgeries at the levels to be treated.
* Infectious symptoms or concomitant rheumatologic diseases.
* Criteria of cervical vertebral instability.
* Congenital spinal malformations.
* Disc herniation at the same cervical level to be operated on.
* Medullary hyperintensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the level(s) to be treated.
18 Years
74 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tecnologico de Monterrey
OTHER
Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI IMSS
OTHER
Hospital Ángeles Tijuana
UNKNOWN
TecSalud
UNKNOWN
Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Mexico
UNKNOWN
TecSalud Investigación Clínica
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mario Benvenutti Regato, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
TecSalud
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Zambrano Hellion, TecSalud
San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ye ZY, Kong WJ, Xin ZJ, Fu Q, Ao J, Cao GR, Cai YQ, Liao WB. Clinical Observation of Posterior Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy as a Treatment for Osseous Foraminal Stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:945-952. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.085. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Lv J, Mei J, Feng X, Tian X, Sun L. Clinical efficacy and safety of posterior minimally invasive surgery in cervical spondylosis: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 13;17(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03274-3.
Metzger RL. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine disorders. Nurse Pract. 2019 Aug;44(8):30-37. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000574648.67659.09.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DEC-SCM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.