Metabolic Exercise Test Data Combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) Score Evolution: Identification of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Heart Failure
NCT ID: NCT06884631
Last Updated: 2025-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
10000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-10
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This has led to the development of prognostic models combining clinical and laboratory parameters. Some of these models incorporate cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), which provides key prognostic indicators. Since the 1990s, CPET has been recommended in heart failure management guidelines due to its strong prognostic value when combined with clinical data.
However, existing risk models often exclude important predictors such as ventilatory parameters from CPET (VE/VCO₂), renal function, and hemoglobin levels. To address this gap, in 2012 the investigators developed the MECKI (Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes) score, integrating oxygen consumption, ventilatory efficiency, and easily accessible biochemical and echocardiographic parameters. Unlike previous models requiring extensive data collection, MECKI is based on only six variables, making it practical and effective.
Recent studies suggest the need to update the cutoff values and parameters used for risk stratification, as new therapies and treatment strategies may significantly alter prognostic accuracy in different patient populations.
This study aims to expand and refine the MECKI score by updating the patient dataset, optimizing its performance in specific subgroups, and aligning it with emerging therapeutic approaches.
Additionally, the investigators will evaluate whether the model's risk accuracy varies in advanced-stage patients, those with comorbidities, or under different treatment regimens. This could lead to correction factors that enhance the score's predictive power across diverse clinical scenarios, further improving its applicability and reliability in heart failure management.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Dynamic Evaluation of Chronic Heart Failure Prognosis: the MECKI Score
NCT06070519
Cardiometabolic evalUation REgistry of Heart Failure
NCT06939985
Predictors of Poor Prognosis in HFpEF
NCT06844032
Prognostic Impact of Noncardiac Comorbidities in Heart Failure Patients
NCT02946476
Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure Study
NCT02334891
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These findings have led to the identification and study of prognostic parameters that, when combined, allow for a more precise risk estimation and identification of high-risk patients. Various prognostic scores have been developed, utilizing algorithms that integrate multiple variables to estimate an individual's mortality risk. Some scores are based on clinical evaluation and comorbidities, others on laboratory findings, baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate, sleep abnormalities, echocardiographic imaging, or cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), either alone or in combination with other factors.
CPET provides several parameters strongly correlated with prognosis. Since the 1990s, its use-alongside clinical data-has been recommended in heart failure management guidelines. More recently, in addition to peak oxygen consumption, the VE/VCO₂ slope has been recognized as a key prognostic marker, reflecting ventilatory efficiency and ventilation-perfusion mismatch, and has been included in heart transplant assessment criteria.
Current risk models in heart failure often omit important prognostic parameters, such as ventilatory indices from CPET, renal function, and hemoglobin levels. Among the numerous prognostic scores available, only the HF Survival Score (HFSS) and the HF Action Predictive Risk Score Model incorporate exercise-related parameters (peak VO₂ in the former and exercise duration in the latter), yet both neglect ventilatory aspects. Even the widely used Seattle Score does not include exercise-related variables.
In 2012, the researchers developed the MECKI (Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes) score, integrating oxygen consumption, ventilatory efficiency, and easily accessible biochemical and echocardiographic parameters. Unlike previous models requiring extensive data collection, MECKI is based on just six key variables, making it both practical and effective.
Recent studies indicate the need to review and update the cutoff values and parameters used in prognostic models, as the introduction of new therapies and treatment strategies may significantly impact their predictive power in specific patient populations.
Study Objectives and Purpose The aim of this study is to expand and update the patient dataset to further develop the MECKI score, optimizing its application in patient subgroups and adapting it to new therapies and treatments introduced in clinical practice.
Additionally, the researchers seek to determine whether risk prediction accuracy varies in advanced-stage patients, those with comorbidities, or those receiving different treatments. This could lead to the development of correction factors for the MECKI score, improving its predictive power and applicability across different clinical scenarios.
Study Population Patients with systolic heart failure, consecutively enrolled and followed at multiple Heart Failure Units across Italy.
Patients undergo assessment through medical history collection, physical examination, laboratory tests, ECG, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).
Follow-up will be conducted according to the protocol of the respective Heart Failure Unit. The follow-up period ends at the last evaluation at the reference center, or upon the patient's death or heart transplantation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Heart failure patients
Patients with systolic heart failure, able to exercise
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* documentation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF \<40%)
* stable clinical conditions
* previous or concomitant cardiopulmonary exercise test
Exclusion Criteria
* clinical unstable condition
* History of pulmonary embolism, significant valvular disease, pericardial disease, severe COPD, exercise-induced angina, exercise-induced ECG changes, severe brady- or tachyarrhythmias, or the presence of comorbidities that interfere with exercise performance.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Santo Spirito Hospital, Italy
OTHER
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio
OTHER
Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Italy
UNKNOWN
Monaldi Hospital
OTHER
Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASU GI)
UNKNOWN
San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy
OTHER
University of Foggia
OTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda Cà Granda
OTHER
Azienda Policlinico Umberto I
OTHER
Federico II University of Naples, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Naples, Italy
UNKNOWN
Città di Lecce Hospital
UNKNOWN
Policlinico G . Martino, Messina Italy
UNKNOWN
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
OTHER
Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze
OTHER
Ospedale San Luca, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano
UNKNOWN
Casa di Cura Mater Dei
UNKNOWN
University of Bari
OTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia
OTHER
I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
UNKNOWN
IRCCS Multimedica
OTHER
Ospedali Riuniti Ancona
OTHER
ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
UNKNOWN
S. Andrea Hospital
OTHER
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
OTHER
Istituto Auxologico Italiano - IRCCS - Ospedale San Luca - Milano
UNKNOWN
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese
UNKNOWN
The Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies
OTHER
Federico II University
OTHER
Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza
UNKNOWN
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Piergiuseppe Agostoni
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Milan, Italy, Italy
Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona
Ancona, , Italy
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri Bari
Bari, , Italy
Ospedale papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, , Italy
Spedali Civili Brescia
Brescia, , Italy
Spedali Civili
Brescia, , Italy
Università di Foggia
Foggia, , Italy
I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, , Italy
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Milan, , Italy
IRCCS Multimedica- Ospedale San Giuseppe
Milan, , Italy
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri Milano
Milan, , Italy
Ospedale Cà Granda- A.O. Niguarda
Milan, , Italy
Federico II hospital
Naples, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli - Ospedale Monaldi
Napoli, , Italy
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Napoli, , Italy
Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione
Palermo, , Italy
Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto
Piacenza, , Italy
Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio
Pisa, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini
Roma, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea
Roma, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policinico Umberto I
Rome, , Italy
Santo Spirito Hospital
Rome, , Italy
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
San Donato Milanese, , Italy
S. Maria alle Scotte Hospital UOC cardiologia clinico-chirurgica (UTIC)
Siena, , Italy
S. Maria alle Scotte Hospital UOSA malattie cardiovascolari
Siena, , Italy
Azienda sanitaria universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI)
Trieste, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CCM 04-21PA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.