Vaginal Probiotics During Pregnancy After Premature Rupture of Membranes

NCT ID: NCT06878443

Last Updated: 2025-07-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-17

Study Completion Date

2025-06-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the microbiota of preterm babies born after premature breaking water with full-term babies microbiota.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is babies' microbiota differs with premature water breaking than full-term babies microbiota?
* Is vaginal probiotics given to the mother influence the baby microbiota? Researchers will compare vaginal probiotics use to no treatment to see if the babies microbiota and mother microbiota is influenced.

Participants will

* Take vaginal probiotics between premature breaking water until delivery (group A)
* Keep a diary of their symptoms and compliance to treatment (group A)
* Take samples of vaginal secretions and of baby's stool (all groups)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Premature rupture of fetal membranes before labor (PPROM) reprensents 30% of premature births. As PPROM is strongly associated with ascending vaginal infection, antibiotics are recommended during the latent period (LP) (the interval between rupture and birth). They prolong the LP and improve the health of the children, but they also aggravate pre-existing vaginal dysbiosis. The addition of vaginal probiotics (VP) stabilizes the vaginal microbiota (VM) and increases Lactobacillus levels. By increasing the number of good germs in the vagina, they will rebalance the good germs and the pathogenic germs that make their way up to the uterus. This could reduce uterine infection and improve the foetus; intestinal flora.

Pathophysiological hypotheses for improving neonatal health:

The use of VP could have three modes of action on neonatal outcome:

i) decrease vaginal dysbiosis: pregnancy prolongation and reduce fetal immaturity complications (e.g.reduce intraventricular hemorrhage); ii) Reduction of intra-uterine infection/inflammation: Reduce neonatal complications linked to inflammation (e.g. diminish cystic periventricular leukomalacia); iii) improvement of neonatal intestinal microbiota (NIM) (probiotic swallowing): reduce complications associated with neonatal dysbiosis (e.g. reduce ulcerative colitis (NEC)).

3.1 Primary objective Mechanistic proof of concept To compare the NIM of the babies of the participants after PPROM with or without probiotics compared with the NIM of the babies of the participants without PRPOM (meconium and at 7 days of life).

Secondary objectives Primary secondary objectives (Group A or B versus C)

1. To compare the VM of participants after PPROM with or without probiotics with the VM of participants without PPROM at the end of pregnancy (early latency phase).
2. Compare the VM of participants after PPROM with or without probiotics with the VM of participants without PPROM in early labor (end of latency phase).
3. To test the possibility of transmission analysis of VP in the NIM (meconium and at 7 d of life) with groups B and C: PPROM-control and control without PPROM.

Secondary clinical objectives

1. Explore recruitment (rate, reasons for acceptance and refusal, characteristics of mothers recruited), treatment adherence \>80% and attrition rate \<5%.
2. Test tools for sample collection, participant information and consent form.

Population:

Pregnant women aged 18 and over, giving birth at one the three centers participating in the study CHUM, CHUSJ or CHUQ (Quebec). These women will be divided into 3 groups:

* Group A: PPROM-VP Pregnant women admitted for PPROM with VP intake
* Group B: PPROM-control Pregnant women admitted for PPROM without VP intake
* Group C: term-control without PPROM Pregnant women with expected full-term deliveries, without VP intake

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pregnancy Prematurity PPROM

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Vaginal Probiotics 1x/day until delivery
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Probiotics group

Pregnant women admitted to one of the center participating in the essay for PPROM accepting vaginal probiotics intake and sample collection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vaginal probiotics

Intervention Type OTHER

Probiotics from Canadian company Lallemand Health Solutions are stored at room temperature and administered vaginally.

Control group - PPROM

Pregnant women admitted to one of the study's centers for PPROM without vaginal probiotics intake

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Control group- Full Term

Pregnant women with expected full-term deliveries, without vaginal probiotics intake

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vaginal probiotics

Probiotics from Canadian company Lallemand Health Solutions are stored at room temperature and administered vaginally.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Groups A and B:

Women ≥ 18 years of age, mono-fetal pregnancy, hospitalized for PPROM between 32 0/7 d and 36 0/7 d weeks of ammenorhea with LP \< 7 days in one of the participating centers, with expectant management, who have consented to participate, agree to collect samples and speak French or English

Group C:

Women ≥ 18 years, mono-fetal pregnancy, expected delivery in one of the participating centers and speaking French or English

Exclusion Criteria

* Groups A and B:
* Presence of active labor,
* Situations contraindicating expectant management (e.g. infection),
* Significant malformation, chromosomal abnormality or fetal death,
* Signs of fetal distress,
* vaginal probiotics intake 15 days before study entry.

For Group A only:

* Allergies to soy and/or milk;
* Weakened immune system (e.g. AIDS, prolonged treatment with corticosteroids),
* Not to have been treated with the following antibiotics during pregnancy: nalidixic acid (Negram) and/or cefoxitin (Mefoxin) and/or sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim).

Group C:

* History of obstetric complications (prematurity \<37 weeks, diagnosed pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes treated with insulin),
* Known obstetrical or fetal complications of the current pregnancy, such as threat of preterm delivery (premature rupture of membranes or preterm labor), chorioamnionitis, placenta previa, active vaginal bleeding, cervical cerclage, fetal distress or malformation, corticosteroid therapy,
* Risk factors for obstetrical complications during pregnancy, such as gestational diabetes, type I/II diabetes and high blood pressure (systole ≥ 140 and diastole ≥ 90),
* Antibiotics taken 15 days prior to inclusion,
* Taking probiotics 15 days prior to inclusion,
* Tested positive for Streptococcus group B during previous pregnancies (as this will require antibiotics at delivery),
* Presence of symptoms such as fever, nausea, vomiting, bloody diarrhea or severe abdominal pain.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lallemand Health Solutions

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHUM Clinical research Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MP-02-2025-12298

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Probiotics After Discharge
NCT02695784 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Multistrain Probiotics Against Bacterial Vaginosis
NCT06888518 TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1