Graston Versus Active Release Technique in Females With Non Specific Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT06877767
Last Updated: 2025-03-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-02
2025-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Soft Ball Tissue Release Exercises on Low Back Pain Secondary to Tight Hip Muscles.
NCT04815941
Effects of Graston Technique in Patients With Non Specific Low Back Pain
NCT04815915
Myofascial Release and Joint Mobilization Therapy in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
NCT04860726
Effects of Self-myofascial Release on Hamstring Flexibility in Patients With Non Specific Low Back Pain
NCT06109116
Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Myofascial Release in Patients With Chronic Non¬Specific Low Back Pain
NCT06796881
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to determine the comparative effects of ART and Graston Technique specifically with each other on Hamstring flexibility, pain and disability in females with nonspecific low back pain. Therefore, this study will put into effect so that Graston Technique and ART can be compared against each other to see if one is more effective for restoration of full soft tissue function and relieving pain. This study will provide significant information that will aid in the creation of therapeutic interventions to improve pain, range of motion and functional limitations in females with non-specific low back pain. Graston Technique (GT) is a soft tissue mobilization treatment method using a tool that generates mechanical micro-traumatic damage to the treated area. In ART the goal is to remove the soft tissue adhesions by decreasing tissue tension. The muscle is taken from a shortened position to a lengthened position while a contact hand is holding tissue tension longitudinally along the soft tissue fibers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A: graston technique
Group A: baseline physical therapy treatment along with graston technique
Graston Technique
Following the conventional treatment, this technique will be carried out through Graston tool called "GT-1" The special Graston Emollient or lubricant will be applied to the hamstrings of the subject then the tool used to find adhesions and break them up for 2.5 minutes per leg. First, the subject will lay prone and bent the knee joint to around 30° to 60°.The Graston instrument will be rubbed on each subject 30 times for 60 seconds from the gluteal line to the popliteal fossa. This treatment technique will be applied twice a week
Group B: active release technique
Group B: baseline physical therapy treatment along with active release technique
Active Release Technique
Following the conventional treatment, subject received single session of ART on each side. There are 3 steps to perform ART. Step 1:Subject lies supine on the plinth and gentle tension was applied to the hamstring muscle along the entire length while stretching the leg in different positions to better work the muscle. Step 2: Gentle tension will be applied at the origin and insertion of the hamstring muscle. Step 3: The therapist will place tension on the bellies of hamstrings longitudinally at a specific tension \& ask the patient to extend his knee as per ART protocol.• This is done for 2.5 minutes on each leg. • This treatment technique will be applied twice a week.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Graston Technique
Following the conventional treatment, this technique will be carried out through Graston tool called "GT-1" The special Graston Emollient or lubricant will be applied to the hamstrings of the subject then the tool used to find adhesions and break them up for 2.5 minutes per leg. First, the subject will lay prone and bent the knee joint to around 30° to 60°.The Graston instrument will be rubbed on each subject 30 times for 60 seconds from the gluteal line to the popliteal fossa. This treatment technique will be applied twice a week
Active Release Technique
Following the conventional treatment, subject received single session of ART on each side. There are 3 steps to perform ART. Step 1:Subject lies supine on the plinth and gentle tension was applied to the hamstring muscle along the entire length while stretching the leg in different positions to better work the muscle. Step 2: Gentle tension will be applied at the origin and insertion of the hamstring muscle. Step 3: The therapist will place tension on the bellies of hamstrings longitudinally at a specific tension \& ask the patient to extend his knee as per ART protocol.• This is done for 2.5 minutes on each leg. • This treatment technique will be applied twice a week.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age group between 25 and 50 years
* History of NSLBP for at least 3 months
* Popliteal angle Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score of 3-7/10
* The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 20-60
* Patients agree to sign written consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any history of injury in the lower extremity in the past three months.
* Constant or persistent severe pain, inflammatory conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis)
* participants must not be taking any treatment of a musculoskeletal nature.
* Any previous surgery around the knee and hip
* hamstrings injury and strains
* Pregnant females
* Allergy to hot pack
25 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ghulam Fatima, PHD*
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital
Sialkot, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allam NM, Eladl HM, Elruwaili LT, Elruwaili LF, Elbenya TJ, Elanzi EM, Elquobisi FF, Elgadoa HM, Elghaleb MA, Elsaeid MS, Elquarenes RA, Elrashed SM, Elmobarak SS, Elkholi SM, Eid MM, Alanazi AM, Nambi G, Abdelbasset WK. Correlation between hamstring muscle tightness and incidence of low back pain in female students at Jouf University, Saudi Arabia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Nov;26(21):7779-7787. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202211_30127.
Sassonker K, Magnezi R, Moran D. Comparing right and left hamstring flexibility and its association to nonspecific lowr back pain among women of different age groups. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Oct;36:404-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
Hori M, Hasegawa H, Takasaki H. Comparisons of hamstring flexibility between individuals with and without low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021 May;37(5):559-582. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1639868. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Nazary-Moghadam S, Yahya-Zadeh A, Zare MA, Ali Mohammadi M, Marouzi P, Zeinalzadeh A. Comparison of utilizing modified hold-relax, muscle energy technique, and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on hamstring muscle length in healthy athletes: Randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jul;35:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.04.079. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
Moon JH, Jung JH, Won YS, Cho HY. Immediate effects of Graston Technique on hamstring muscle extensibility and pain intensity in patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Feb;29(2):224-227. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.224. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/RCR & AHS/24/0148
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.