Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
1800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-17
2027-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Does the QR program improve perceived satisfaction with care among mental health service users?
* What are the implementation procedures of the program?
* What is its budgetary impact?
Researchers will compare the QR program intervention with usual practices.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Promoting the Role of General Practitioners in a Mental Health Care System Integrated With Primary Care in Adolescence, According to the World Health Organization Definition
NCT07186335
A Quality Rating Scale for Patients in Complex Situations
NCT03886285
Establish an Evaluation Scale for the Quality of Primary Care in Multi-professional Health Centres and Homes Integrating the Point of View of Patients in Complex Care Situations and Their Caregivers.
NCT05057520
Health Care Access for Asylum Seekers in Brittany : Description, Associated Factors and Levers of Improvement
NCT03754374
Valuation of Health State Using Virtual Reality
NCT02907034
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The World Health Organization's (WHO) QualityRights (QR) program offers assessments, called "observations", and recommendations to help mental health facilities, on a voluntary basis, improve their care practices towards better respect of the rights of service users. However, the program has never been evaluated in a French national context.
The WHO QR program, published in 2012 and regularly updated since, aims to improve the quality of care in mental health and related services and promote the rights of people with psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities.
The reference base for the tools that make up the program is the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), ratified by France in 2010. This international convention defines ambitious objectives in terms of respect for rights, some of which are particularly relevant to mental health services. However, the convention does not offer any concrete indications as to how these major international standards are to be applied.
The QR program provides a concrete response to this need, offering observation and training tools not only for mental health services, but more broadly for all those concerned by mental health issues. In particular, the observation methodology is designed to respond to a request for support in changing practices that comes directly from a facility.
The WHO Collaborating Centre in Lille is mandated by the WHO to roll out this program in France and other French-speaking countries. It is expected that the QualityRights approach will act as a lever for change in the organization of services, providing a multidisciplinary perspective on users' rights and recovery-oriented practices.
The primary research objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the QR program on the perceived satisfaction with care of mental health service users.
The secondary research objectives concern:
A. Evaluating the effectiveness of the QR program on:
1. Improving work-related quality of life among mental health professionals
2. Decreasing the number of involuntary admissions
3. Reducing the length of full-time hospital stays
4. Reducing the number of acts of seclusion and restraint
5. The distribution of clinical activity in favour of ambulatory activity
B. Evaluating the efficiency and the budgetary impact of the QR program.
C. Conducting an implementation study to understand the appropriation of the recommendations by professionals and management following the introduction of the QR program by exploring the representations linked to the QR program and respect for users' rights among mental health professionals.
This research involves an effectiveness study, supplemented by an implementation study based on a qualitative methodology, and an economic evaluation.
The effectiveness study is a cluster randomized trial designed to compare the effectiveness of the QR program intervention versus usual practices on user satisfaction. The cluster is defined at the level of the psychiatric sector (the public psychiatric care entity organizing the mental health care of a population within a pre-specified geographical and demographic area in France, to meet local needs). 10 psychiatric sectors are participating, randomized into two groups: the intervention group receiving the QR program and the control group maintaining their usual practices.
Data will be collected in both groups at baseline, and during follow-up at 1 and 2 years. The implementation study and the economic evaluation will be carried out in the intervention group after the effectiveness study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Sectors receiving the WHO QualityRights program
WHO QualityRights program
The WHO's QualityRights program involves an assessment, called observation, of mental health care services by an ephemeral multidisciplinary team, which provides feedback and recommendations for improving care practices. The observation team, trained in the QualityRights (QR) methodology, includes mental health professionals, researchers, legal experts, and management staff from mental health organizations. Each team always incorporates at least one expert by experience and one informal caregiver or family member. Participation in the program is voluntary and initiated at the request of healthcare facilities.
The observation is structured into three stages:
1. Site preparation
2. On-site observation
3. Restitution of observation report and follow-up
Usual practices
Sectors not receiving the WHO QualityRights program, and maintaining usual practices
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
WHO QualityRights program
The WHO's QualityRights program involves an assessment, called observation, of mental health care services by an ephemeral multidisciplinary team, which provides feedback and recommendations for improving care practices. The observation team, trained in the QualityRights (QR) methodology, includes mental health professionals, researchers, legal experts, and management staff from mental health organizations. Each team always incorporates at least one expert by experience and one informal caregiver or family member. Participation in the program is voluntary and initiated at the request of healthcare facilities.
The observation is structured into three stages:
1. Site preparation
2. On-site observation
3. Restitution of observation report and follow-up
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Persons having formulated a non-opposition to participate in the study
* Population a (users): Service users of the psychiatric sectors involved in the study hospitalized full-time since at least 3 days in an inpatient unit.
* Population b (professionals): Mental health professionals working in the sector since at least 3 months at the time of study participation
Exclusion Criteria
* Persons subject to a safeguard of justice measure
* Persons who do not speak or understand the French language
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
INSERM ECEVE 1123
UNKNOWN
L'Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
UNKNOWN
GCS-CCOMS
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Déborah Sebbane, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
GCS-CCOMS & ECEVE 1123 INSERM
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Public mental health establishment of Lille Metropole (59G09/G10)
Armentières, , France
Public mental health establishment of Lille Metropole (59G20)
Armentières, , France
Hospital Centre of Erstein
Erstein, , France
Psychotherapeutic Center of Nancy
Laxou, , France
Hospital Centre Drôme Vivarais
Montéléger, , France
Hospital Care Center of Nanterre
Nanterre, , France
Hospital Centre Sainte-Marie Nice
Nice, , France
Hospital Center of Plaisir (78G16)
Plaisir, , France
Hospital Center of Plaisir (78G18)
Plaisir, , France
Hospital Center of Candélie
Pont-du-Casse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PREPS-22-0042
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2024-A00092-45
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.