ESKetamine Low-dose vs Ketamine Low-dose for Severe Acute Pain in Emergency Units, Comparison of PsychodyslEptic Effects

NCT ID: NCT06853041

Last Updated: 2025-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-06

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Almost 30% of painful patients in emergency departments (ED) describe their pain as severe (i.e. a Verbal Numerical Rating Score VNRS ≥ 6 on a scale ranging from 0 to 10). The management of such severe pain needs to be rapid and safe, and for this purpose intravenous (IV) morphine titration is still the gold-standard. However, morphine titration takes up considerable caregiver time, as patients need to be monitored and treated progressively with small quantities of morphine every 5 minutes until analgesia. This is sometimes difficult to reconcile with a saturating flow of patients, and overcrowding in ED is proven to significantly delay time-to-analgesia, and even lead to deleterious under-treatment. Finally, the opioid crisis is a major concern, explaining why strategies are being advocated to develop other ways of managing severe acute pain in the ED and to limit the use of opioids.

Recent studies show that ketamine administered in small IV doses ("low-dose" ketamine LDK: 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg) possesses potent analgesic activity as well as interesting anti-hyperalgesic and anti-allodynic properties. Compared with morphine, LDK does not induce respiratory depression, but can sometimes induce disturbing psychodysleptic effects. These may include a sensation of unreality, fatigue, anxiety, dizziness or hallucinations. According to studies, 30-80% of LDK-treated patients experience psychodysleptic effects. However, two recent studies suggest that slow IV injections of LDK (over 10 minutes) may improve patient tolerance, although these slow infusions do not totally reduce this discomfort.

Pharmacologically, ketamine is a racemic mixture of 2 isomers: esketamine S(+), which is dextrorotatory, and arketamine R(-), which is levorotatory. In recent years, a new formulation containing only esketamine has been made available to hospitals in some northern European countries, and more recently in France. Esketamine appears to have twice the analgesic efficacy of racemic ketamine, and studies on healthy volunteers or in peri-operative settings suggest that it is also better tolerated psychologically than ketamine. For the moment, however, scientific data are lacking, and no comparative trial has yet been conducted in the ED setting. The investigators plan to conduct in their ED a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind study aiming to compare the tolerance and efficacy of esketamine versus racemic LDK in patients presenting with severe acute pain (VNRS ≥ 6/10).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

More than two-thirds of patients visiting emergency departments (ED) complain of acute pain, and of these, almost 30% describe their pain as severe (i.e. a Verbal Numerical Rating Score VNRS ≥ 6 on a scale ranging from 0 to 10). The management of such severe pain needs to be rapid, safe and adapted to the suspected underlying causative pathology. To achieve this, recommendations call for widespread use of intravenous (IV) morphine titration, which combines high analgesic efficacy with a good clinical safety profile (low risk of respiratory depression). However, the need to monitor patients and inject small quantities of morphine every 5 minutes until the patient is relieved takes up a considerable amount of caregiver time, which is sometimes difficult to reconcile with a saturating flow of patients. This growing problem of overcrowding in ED can lead to significant under-treatment and delays in analgesia. At the same time, the opioid crisis in the USA is beginning to affect other countries, which explains why certain strategies are being advocated to limit the use of opioids, and why researchers are attempting to develop other ways of managing severe acute pain in the ED. Recent studies show that ketamine administered in small IV doses ("low-dose" ketamine KLD: 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg) possesses potent analgesic activity comparable to that of IV morphine. These analgesic qualities have been known for decades, and ketamine's unique non-competitive antagonism of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic) receptor also results in interesting anti-hyperalgesic and anti-allodynic properties. Compared with morphine, KLD does not induce the risk of respiratory depression, but can induce psychodysleptic effects that can sometimes be troublesome. These may include a sensation of unreality, fatigue, anxiety, dizziness or hallucinations. According to studies, 30 to 80% of patients treated with KLD experience a psychodysleptic effect. However, two recent studies suggest that slow IV injections of KLD (\>10 min) may improve patient tolerance, although this slow injection may not significantly reduce this discomfort. Pharmacologically, ketamine is a racemic mixture of 2 isomers: esketamine S(+), which is dextrorotatory, and arketamine R(-), which is laevorotatory. In recent years, a new formulation containing only esketamine has been made available to hospitals in some northern European countries, and more recently in France. Esketamine appears to have twice the analgesic efficacy of racemic ketamine, and studies on healthy volunteers or in peri-operative settings suggest that it is also better tolerated psychologically than ketamine. For the moment, however, scientific data are lacking, and to our knowledge no comparative trial has yet been conducted in the ED setting. The prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind study the investigators plan to conduct in the ED will compare the tolerance and efficacy of esketamine versus racemic LDK in patients presenting with severe acute pain (VNRS ≥ 6/10).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

low-dose esketamine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Esketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

A single slow intravenous injection of low-dose esketamine (0.15 mg/kg) over 10 minutes using an infusion pump.

low-dose ketamine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

A single slow intravenous injection of low-dose ketamine (0,3 mg/kg) with an infusion pump, during 10 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Esketamine

A single slow intravenous injection of low-dose esketamine (0.15 mg/kg) over 10 minutes using an infusion pump.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ketamine

A single slow intravenous injection of low-dose ketamine (0,3 mg/kg) with an infusion pump, during 10 minutes

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients aged 18 or over,
* consulting our emergency department for a medical or traumatic pathology responsible for acute (less than 7 days old) and severe pain (greater than or equal to 6 on the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale, which has 11 levels from 0 = no pain to 10 = maximum imaginable pain).
* Free and informed consent given before the start of the trial.
* Patients affiliated to social security system.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to quantify pain score ;
* proven or suspected intoxication (drug or alcohol) leading to consciousness disorders (Glasgow score less than or equal to 15) ;
* person under legal protection or deprived of liberty ;
* pregnant or breast-feeding patients ;
* known allergy to ketamine or esketamine ;
* history of drug addiction or dependence ;
* insufficiently controlled hyperthyroidism ;
* history of cerebral of myocardial infarction ;
* known severe heart failure ;
* existence of intracranial hypertension, glaucoma or ocular trauma ;
* unstable vital signs (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg or \> 180, heart rate \< 50 per minute or \> 150, respiratory rate \< 10 per minute or \> 30) ;
* chronic treatment with aminophylline, theophylline or methylergometrine ;
* administration of morphine or another opioid within one hour of inclusion ;
* ongoing simultaneous participation in another study that could interfere with the treatment studied or the results of statistical analysis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de NICE

Nice, Alpes-maritimes, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fabien LEMOEL, PH

Role: CONTACT

+33 (4) 92 03 86 27

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fabien LEMOEL, PH

Role: primary

+33 (4) 92 03 86 27

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-PP-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.