Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Prognostic and Diagnostic Biomarker Identification in Disorders of Consciousness
NCT ID: NCT06845800
Last Updated: 2025-08-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
28 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-21
2025-03-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Is it possible to identify biomarkers with high diagnostic relevance for distinguishing subcategories of patients with Disorders of Consciousness?
* Can biomarkers with potential medium- and long-term prognostic value be identified for each category of patients with Disorders of Consciousness?
Participants will undergo an EEG examination during near-nerve stimulation of the median nerve. Clinical and anamnestic data will also be recorded and collected at follow-up.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prognostication of Recovery in Early Disorders of Consciousness Study
NCT07074678
Window On the Brain
NCT06693492
Prognostication of Recovery in Early Disorders of Consciousness Study
NCT04692922
Biomarkers of Synaptic Damage in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT03217396
Multimodal Neuroprognostication in Disorders of Consciousness
NCT04534777
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In addition to clinical and standard neurophysiological evaluations, two types of SSEPs are acquired during continuous EEG recording through both Surface Cutaneous Stimulation (SCS) and Near-Nerve Stimulation (NNS) of the median nerve. EEG signals are collected using a 61-channel cap with a sampling rate of 512 Hz.
The electrical stimulation is applied over the median nerve proximally to the wrist, and the stimulation side is chosen contralaterally to the less affected hemisphere. Superficial bipolar electrodes are used for SCS, whereas a microneedle with 1 MΩ of impedance is inserted under the skin for NNS. The electrical pulse of 0.2 ms is delivered at a rate of 1 Hz in two sets of 50 repetitions. The stimulation amplitude is chosen as the minimum value able to generate a response only in sensory or sensory-motor fibers for NNS and SCS, respectively. The only sensory activation in NNS is preferred to minimize the influence of motor twitches on brain responses. For SCS, due to the difficulty of exclusively stimulating sensory fibers, the amplitude is set as the minimal value required to elicit both sensory and motor activation.
To monitor the stimulated fibers, the peripheral pathway of the median nerve is recorded. In particular, surface electrodes are positioned on the three fingers innervated by the median nerve for the acquisition of Sensory Nerve Action Potential (SNAP) and on the palm proximally to the motor twitch for the acquisition of Compound Motor Action Potential (CMAP). This information is essential in patients with DoC for different reasons:
i) Identifying the proximity to the median nerve, a crucial step due to the unresponsiveness and lack of cooperation of this population.ii) Identifying the type of active fibers.iii) Monitoring feedback to confirm the accurate placement of the microelectrode.
Whenever the minimum amplitude evokes a CMAP/SNAP, the related amplitude is selected for SCS/NNS. The device automatically extracts the mean values of amplitude and latency of CMAP/SNAP during the experimental session.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with Disorders of Consciousness admitted to the Intensive Rehabilitation Unit
Patients admitted with a Disorder of Consciousness to the Intensive Rehabilitation Unit (IRU) of Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi (Florence).
* Age ≥ 18 years, both sexes;
* Severe Acquired Brain Injury (ABI), regardless of etiology;
* Patients with a severe alteration of consciousness due to severe ABI of various etiologies, including Cardiac Arrest, Traumatic Brain Injury, Cerebral Ischemia, or Hemorrhage;
* Signed informed consent provided by a family member, caregiver, or legal guardian.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Severe acquired brain injury (regardless of etiology);
* Patients with severe alteration of consciousness state due to severe acquired brain injury of various etiologies (Cardiac Arrest, Traumatic Brain Injury, Cerebral Ischemia or Hemorrhage);
* Informed consent signature by family member/caregiver/legal guardian.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous neurological diseases;
* Previous acute brain injuries, psychiatric disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, neoplasms, severe systemic diseases;
* Modified Barthel Index pre-event \< 50;
* Unstable medical conditions.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna Pisa
UNKNOWN
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi
Florence, FI, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vallbo AB. Microneurography: how it started and how it works. J Neurophysiol. 2018 Sep 1;120(3):1415-1427. doi: 10.1152/jn.00933.2017. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
Mano T, Iwase S, Toma S. Microneurography as a tool in clinical neurophysiology to investigate peripheral neural traffic in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;117(11):2357-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
Hakiki B, Donnini I, Romoli AM, Draghi F, Maccanti D, Grippo A, Scarpino M, Maiorelli A, Sterpu R, Atzori T, Mannini A, Campagnini S, Bagnoli S, Ingannato A, Nacmias B, De Bellis F, Estraneo A, Carli V, Pasqualone E, Comanducci A, Navarro J, Carrozza MC, Macchi C, Cecchi F. Clinical, Neurophysiological, and Genetic Predictors of Recovery in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injuries (PRABI): A Study Protocol for a Longitudinal Observational Study. Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 28;13:711312. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.711312. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TUNEBEAM_MICRODOC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.