Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-06
2027-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The initial anatomical outcome of surgery depends on the accurate execution of the corneal sutures. Very recently, a robot with microsurgical capabilities was developed by the MMI company (Symani® surgical system, now available from the Reims University Hospital). This robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissues and microsurgical needles with an amplitude of movement greater than that of the human hand. It is operated by a surgeon via a wireless controller and foot pedal. It could thus be used to perform the usual sutures of a transfixing keratoplasty.
To our knowledge, no study to date has evaluated the contribution of a microsurgical robot to transfixing keratoplasty in humans. The Symani® microsurgical robot recently received CE marking for microsurgery. The investigators were able to carry out a series of ex vivo keratoplasties using the robot to suture non-conforming human corneas (destined for destruction), thus proving the feasibility of the procedure.
On the basis of this proof of concept, our project aims to evaluate the performance of robot-assisted transfixing keratoplasty in patients requiring corneal transplantation. Robotic assistance for human eye surgery, particularly corneal transplants, has never been evaluated. The use of a robot to perform corneal sutures during transfixing keratoplasty could equal or even surpass the performance of this crucial surgical step, which is conventionally performed manually. Ultimately, visual results could be equivalent or even better than those obtained after conventional surgery. At the same time, the use of the robot will be evaluated in terms of surgical cost, in order to obtain a quantified financial evaluation of robot-assisted keratoplasty.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Techniques in Achieving Corneal Graft
NCT01610973
Intacs for Keratoconus
NCT00347230
Corneal De-epithelization Associated With a Therapeutic Photokeratectomy in Patients With Evolutive Keratoconus
NCT02857881
Corneal Tissue Inlay for Keratoconus
NCT02649738
Long-term Result of Placing Intracorneal Rings in Keratoconus Using Laser
NCT05596838
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Suturing is therefore an essential part of transfixing keratoplasty. They determine the congruence of the tissue edges and the distribution of tension applied to the sutures, thus modulating the curvature (astigmatism) of the graft. This curvature will determine the optical properties of the eye, and hence its acuity and the patient's visual recovery. A topical immunomodulatory local treatment (corticosteroids and/or ciclosporin eye drops) is administered for several years; no systemic treatment is used. Sutures are usually removed 6 months to 1 year after surgery. Current indications are major declines in visual acuity - generally below 4/10 with the best possible correction - associated with i) severe keratoconus, the most frequent indication, ii) failed anterior grafts, iii) full-thickness central corneal scars, and iv) hereditary stromal dystrophies.
Robot-assisted surgery has developed considerably over the last twenty years, with procedures now routinely performed in macro- and endoscopic surgery (mainly urology, obstetrics and visceral surgery). Very recently, engineering advances in precision motion control and mechanical miniaturization have enabled the development of robots dedicated to microsurgery. The Symani® Surgical System (Medical MicroInstrument, Pisa, Italy) has been used and evaluated in animals and humans over the past two years for vessel and nerve microsurgery. The Symani® robot is equipped with forceps and a needle holder capable of handling fragile tissue, as well as microsurgical needles and wires (8/0 to 12/0). The Symani® robot has recently been CE-marked for microsurgery \[appendix 1\]. To date, there is only one study - ex vivo and in animals - on the feasibility of its use in ocular surgery. On the basis of the robot's capabilities and its CE mark, the investigators have carried out preliminary experiments, enabling us to envisage robot-assisted keratoplasty in humans.
On the basis of our preliminary results, the investigators hypothesize that it is possible to use the Symani® robot's assistance to perform the major surgical stage of transfixing keratoplasty, i.e. the sutures between the graft and the recipient cornea, in humans.
Objectives :
* Main:
1. Evaluate the feasibility, and intraoperative intercurrent events of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty,
2. Identify possible early and late postoperative intercurrent events/adverse events related to robot use.
* Secondary :
i) Evaluate the impact of robotic assistance during transfixing keratoplasty on postoperative corneal anatomical outcome (graft curvature).
ii) Assess the impact of robotic assistance on refraction and visual outcome in the medium term: 3 months iii) Evaluate the mean degree of astigmatism post robotic-assisted grafting, so as to be able to calculate the number of subjects required for a subsequent study of the superiority of robotic-assisted surgery over usual conventional surgery.
iiii) Evaluate the additional cost of robotic-assisted surgery. iv) Evaluate the quality of life before and 3 months after the intervention Type of study: pilot feasibility study, monocentric, interventional. Population: Ten consecutive adult patients requiring transfixing keratoplasty who agreed to participate by signing an informed consent form.
Investigation plan : The study will be offered to patients scheduled for penetrating keratoplasty. Clinical follow-up will be conducted at Day 1, Day 7, Day 30. Final clinical and paraclinical check-up at Day 90 and end of participation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robot-assisted keratoplasty group
patients undergoing robot-assisted corneal transplantation
Robot-assisted keratoplasty
Feasibility pilot interventional study. Monocentric, one arm. Microsurgical robot will be used to perform penetrating keratoplasty. During the procedure, the corneal sutures will be performed using symani surgical system, that is a microsurgical robot controlled by a surgeon
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robot-assisted keratoplasty
Feasibility pilot interventional study. Monocentric, one arm. Microsurgical robot will be used to perform penetrating keratoplasty. During the procedure, the corneal sutures will be performed using symani surgical system, that is a microsurgical robot controlled by a surgeon
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Affiliated to a social security scheme
* Agreeing to take part in the study (information and signature of consent form).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with an ocular pathology other than their corneal pathology.
* Mentally incapable of adhering to the principles of the study.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CHU de Reims
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chu Reims
Reims, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PS25009*
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.