Ultrasonographic Patterns and Pathological Correlation in the Diagnosis of Subcutaneous Nodules
NCT ID: NCT06838988
Last Updated: 2025-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-24
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients who presented with subcutaneous nodules and was indicated for diagnostic skin biopsies were recruited. Prior to skin biopsies (not part of the study's intervention), ultrasonography(intervention) was used to examine the characteristics of the nodules. The ultrasonographic findings are then compared to the pathological results to explore the role of ultrasonography in differentiating each disease or group of diseases that presented with skin nodules.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Doppler Ultrasound in Characterization of Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
NCT03171857
Ultrasound in Diagnosing Patients With Skin Lesions
NCT03914846
Lung Ultrasound in Comparison With C.T in Covid-19
NCT05158803
Investigation of Ultrasound Elastographic Techniques in Soft Tissue Pathology
NCT02086357
Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathies
NCT01384357
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since 1997, Ackerman has proposed diagnostic guidelines for panniculitis based on histopathological findings, initially categorizing it according to the site of inflammation into septal panniculitis and lobular panniculitis. Further classification considers whether vasculitis is present. However, even with physical examination and histopathological analysis, accurately classifying panniculitis remains challenging. In 2007, Requena and colleagues highlighted limitations in biopsy, such as the selection of lesions with differing characteristics or lesions at different stages, resulting in varying histopathological features. Moreover, the depth or insufficient amount of tissue collected for biopsy may reduce diagnostic accuracy.
Since 1979, medical advancements have led to the increased use of ultrasound in dermatological diagnosis. Low-frequency ultrasound machines (2 MHz) were initially used to examine skin lesions, such as skin inflammation or subcutaneous nodules. In 1983, Miyauchi and colleagues began using higher-frequency ultrasound (10 MHz) to study ultrasound characteristics compared to histopathological results in patients presenting with subcutaneous or dermal nodules. Over time, the use of higher-frequency ultrasound became more common, as it provides better detail and convenience, being a simple, safe, and cost-effective procedure.
For panniculitis, research has shown that ultrasound can assist in diagnosis. In 2020, Romani and colleagues studied the correlation between ultrasound findings and histopathology in 62 cases of panniculitis. Septal panniculitis typically shows thickening of the septa with hypoechoic areas resembling a jigsaw pattern, difficult to compress, increased blood flow, and possible clotting in veins. Lobular panniculitis shows hyperechoic fat with irregular borders, without septal thickening or increased vascularity, and may show fat necrosis or extension into muscles and adjacent tissues. However, further research is needed for clear differentiation between types of panniculitis based on ultrasound features.
Subsequent studies have used ultrasound to describe various forms of panniculitis, including those caused by gout, erythema nodosum, lupus erythematosus, and subcutaneous T-cell lymphoma, among others.
In conclusion, diagnosing panniculitis in patients with subcutaneous nodules remains challenging and relies on a combination of physical examination, patient history, histopathology, and sometimes additional tests like immunohistochemistry, cultures, or PCR. These diagnostic procedures can lead to unnecessary testing and delays in diagnosis. Ultrasound data can assist in selecting appropriate laboratory tests, facilitate diagnosis and treatment monitoring, and aid in selecting biopsy sites. However, there is no comprehensive collection of ultrasound data for different conditions, which is why this study was conducted to gather this information and explore the correlation between ultrasound findings and histopathological features for more accurate diagnosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transcutaneous ultrasonography
This is a single group study with one intervention arm where every subjects received ultrasonographic evaluations of their skin lesions (subcutaneous nodules)
Transcutaneous ultrasound
The ultrasonographic characteristics of the subcutaneous nodules were evaluated using an ultrasound machine (Venue Go™, wide-band linear array ultrasound probe (hockey stick shape), frequency range between 6.7 MHz and 18.0 MHz, from GE HealthCare Illinois, United States).
The procedure for capturing images at the location of the lesion of interest is as follows:
* Brightness mode (B-mode): Record at least 4 images using a depth of 2 cm.
* Color Doppler mode: Record images along the vertical axis (1 image) and along the horizontal axis (1 image). The two axes mentioned above must be perpendicular to each other.
* Video recording: Capture at least 10 seconds of video in both Brightness mode and Color Doppler mode.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcutaneous ultrasound
The ultrasonographic characteristics of the subcutaneous nodules were evaluated using an ultrasound machine (Venue Go™, wide-band linear array ultrasound probe (hockey stick shape), frequency range between 6.7 MHz and 18.0 MHz, from GE HealthCare Illinois, United States).
The procedure for capturing images at the location of the lesion of interest is as follows:
* Brightness mode (B-mode): Record at least 4 images using a depth of 2 cm.
* Color Doppler mode: Record images along the vertical axis (1 image) and along the horizontal axis (1 image). The two axes mentioned above must be perpendicular to each other.
* Video recording: Capture at least 10 seconds of video in both Brightness mode and Color Doppler mode.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indicated for pathological examination for disease diagnosis.
* Patients with subcutaneous nodules located in areas where a tissue sample can be taken down to the fat layer.
* Patients who agree to participate in the project by signing the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with diseases that significantly alter the structure of the skin or subcutaneous tissue, such as scleroderma or severe edema.
* A history of previous treatments in the area of the subcutaneous mass (e.g., surgery, radiation therapy, or high-dose steroid treatment) that may interfere with ultrasound results.
* Patients with lesions on the head or mucous membranes of the body.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
* Presence of wounds or open sores in the area to be examined with ultrasound.
* A history of coagulopathy (blood clotting disorders).
* Patients with metal implants in the area of interest that may interfere with ultrasound imaging.
* Participants who refuse or withdraw from the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Suthinee Rutnin
Suthinee Rutnin, MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ramathibodi Hospital
Bangkok, Ratchathewi, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kang BS, Choi SH, Cha HJ, Jung YK, Lee JH, Jeong AK, Shin SH, Kwon WJ. Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma: US and CT findings in three patients. Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Jun;36 Suppl 1:S67-71. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0173-6. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
Nazzaro G, Maronese CA, Passoni E. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of erythema nodosum. Skin Res Technol. 2022 Mar;28(2):361-364. doi: 10.1111/srt.13112. Epub 2021 Nov 23. No abstract available.
Delgado-Jimenez Y, Fraga J, Garcia-Diez A. Infective panniculitis. Dermatol Clin. 2008 Oct;26(4):471-80, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2008.05.005.
Gaviria JL, Ortega VG, Gaona J, Motta A, Medina Barragan OJ. Unusual Dermatological Manifestations of Gout: Review of Literature and a Case Report. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Aug 10;3(7):e445. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000420. eCollection 2015 Jul.
Maldonado Cid P, Rubio Flores C, Prats Caelles I, Leis Dosil VM, Alfageme Roldan F, Richi Alberti P, Santonja Garriga C, Diaz Diaz RM. High-frequency ultrasound features in a case of gouty panniculitis. Dermatol Online J. 2017 Jun 15;23(6):13030/qt33j2z14m.
Romani J, Giavedoni P, Roe E, Vidal D, Luelmo J, Wortsman X. Inter- and Intra-rater Agreement of Dermatologic Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Lobular and Septal Panniculitis. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Jan;39(1):107-112. doi: 10.1002/jum.15080. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Catalano O, Wortsman X. Dermatology Ultrasound. Imaging Technique, Tips and Tricks, High-Resolution Anatomy. Ultrasound Q. 2020 Dec;36(4):321-327. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000520.
Wortsman X, Alfageme F, Roustan G, Arias-Santiago S, Martorell A, Catalano O, Scotto di Santolo M, Zarchi K, Bouer M, Gonzalez C, Bard R, Mandava A, Gaitini D. Guidelines for Performing Dermatologic Ultrasound Examinations by the DERMUS Group. J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Mar;35(3):577-80. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.06046. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
Nessi R, Betti R, Bencini PL, Crosti C, Blanc M, Uslenghi C. Ultrasonography of nodular and infiltrative lesions of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990 Feb;18(2):103-9. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870180207.
Mandava A, Ravuri PR, Konathan R. High-resolution ultrasound imaging of cutaneous lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013 Jul;23(3):269-77. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.120272.
Gropper CA, Stiller MJ, Shupack JL, Driller J, Rorke M, Lizzi F. Diagnostic high-resolution ultrasound in dermatology. Int J Dermatol. 1993 Apr;32(4):243-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb04261.x. No abstract available.
Requena L. Normal subcutaneous fat, necrosis of adipocytes and classification of the panniculitides. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007 Jun;26(2):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2007.02.001.
Requena L, Sanchez Yus E. Panniculitis. Part II. Mostly lobular panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Sep;45(3):325-61; quiz 362-4. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2001.114735.
Requena L, Yus ES. Panniculitis. Part I. Mostly septal panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Aug;45(2):163-83; quiz 184-6. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2001.114736.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MURA2025/83
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.