Cryopreservation of Ovarian Tissue: Reimplantation Rate and Effects on Ovarian Function
NCT ID: NCT06835088
Last Updated: 2025-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-12
2031-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The prevalence of POI in the general population is about 1%. In recent years, the incidence of iatrogenic POI in cancer women is increasing: 4% of patients of fertile age are diagnosed with neoplasms and gonadal treatments that can sterilize them, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Preserving fertility is a key objective for many cancer patients.
Before gonadotoxic treatments, patients in the post-pubertal age with future desire for pregnancy may opt for two main methods of preservation of fertility (FP): egg cryopreservation (OC) after ovarian stimulation and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue (OTC). An important limitation of the latter technique is the reduced number of patients who return to use the cryopreserved material, leading to a negative impact on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the procedure. The best way to maximise the effectiveness of the procedure in clinical and economic terms would be to increase the number of patients who continue the cryopreservation path by completing it with subsequent reimplantation. It would also be useful to improve the follow-up of these patients by evaluating their ovarian function over time, before and after the removal and reimplantation, through the study of bone metabolism, cardiovascular risk and psychological function in these women.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ovarian Needle Puncture for Follicle Activation in IVF Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve
NCT04608695
Establishing of an Early Warming System of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
NCT03518944
Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation in Females Undergoing Procedures That Will Potentially Lead To Loss of Ovarian Function
NCT01993732
Ovarian Tissue Allo-transplantation
NCT06673004
Effects of Intraovarian Platelet Rich Plasma in Women With Poor Ovarian Response and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
NCT04237909
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Before gonadotoxic treatments, patients in the post-pubertal age with future desire for pregnancy may opt for two main methods of preservation of fertility (FP): egg cryopreservation (OC) after ovarian stimulation and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue (OTC). The OC has been proven to be a reproducible, safe and effective technique for several years. However, it has some important limitations: OC may delay the start of treatment for cancer; in some specific types of cancer, ovarian stimulation should be avoided; the technique cannot be performed in prepubertal patients.
In these cases, OTC, a technique which has emerged from its experimental phase, now safe and with an increasing number of successes, is considered as the unique option for FP. Also, unlike OC, OTC allows the induction of puberty in prepubertal patients, restoration of ovarian hormonal function for 3-7 years, until the graft is active, and may be renewed by subsequent reimplantation of orthotopic or heterotropic tissue.
An important limitation of this technique is the reduced number of patients who return to use the cryopreserved material, which has a negative impact on the evaluation of the effectiveness of the procedure. Several causes in the period between ovarian sampling and transplantation may justify this low rate, including: i) loss of desire for pregnancy; ii) recurrence of cancer; iii) death of the patient; iv) financial reasons; ) fear of cancer recurrence due to contamination of ovarian sampling; vi) occurrence of spontaneous pregnancies; vii) absence of current partner.
The best way to maximise the effectiveness of the procedure in clinical and economic terms would be to increase the number of patients who continue the cryopreservation path by completing it with subsequent reimplantation. It would also be useful to improve the follow-up of these patients by evaluating their ovarian function over time, before and after the removal and reimplantation, through the study of bone metabolism, cardiovascular risk and psychological function in these women.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Suffering from diseases that require gonadotropic treatments
* Have been subjected to sampling and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue at the Operative Unit of Gynecology and Pathophysiology of Human Reproduction of the Sant'Orsola Polyclinic in Bologna
* Informed Consent Acquisition
Exclusion Criteria
13 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Renato Seracchioli, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRIO-2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.