Dural Venous Sinus Stent in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
NCT ID: NCT06833424
Last Updated: 2025-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-01
2026-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcome of Cerebral Venous Sinuses Stenting on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
NCT05308823
Current Treatment Methods of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
NCT06353412
The Effects of MAP and EtCO2 on Venous Sinus Pressures
NCT03867461
Intracranial Venous Stenting Evaluation in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in the Early Phase
NCT06919744
Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: a Cohort Study
NCT05203887
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The first line of treatment for IIH consists of weight loss and/or medical therapy including diuretics such as acetazolamide. When medical treatment fails, surgical options include cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion via ventriculoperitoneal (VP) or lumboperitoneal (LP) shunting or optic nerve sheath fenestration. Recently, another etiology of cerebral venous hypertension has garnered increasing attention as a putative cause of IIH, cerebral venous Dural sinus stenosis. In medically refractory IIH patients with a physiologic pressure gradient across venous stenosis, cerebral venous stenting has emerged as an alternative treatment to traditional surgical approaches.
Transverse sinus stenosis can be seen in 2 morphologic forms: an extrinsic smooth gradually narrowing tapered stenosis and intrinsic discrete obstructions, presumably due to arachnoid granulations or fibrous septae. While intrinsic transverse sinus stenosis might cause IIH by completely occluding the transverse sinus, the extrinsic compression resolves with CSF drainage. might be secondary to intracranial hypertension. Venous sinus stenting (VSS) reduces intracranial venous pressures and improves idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) symptoms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dural Venous sinus stent
40 Patients Diagnosed with idiopathic intracranial hypertension according to modified Dandy Criteria subjected to Dural venous sinus stenting
Dural venous sinus stenting
40 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension according to Modified Dandy Criteria will subjected to Dural venous stenting
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dural venous sinus stenting
40 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension according to Modified Dandy Criteria will subjected to Dural venous stenting
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Signs and symptoms of increased intracranial pressure: Headaches, nausea, vomiting, visual changes, and papilledema.
2. No localizing or focal neurologic signs: Except for possible unilateral or bilateral VI nerve paresis.
3. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure: Without cytologic or chemical abnormalities.
4. No etiology for increased intracranial pressure: On neuroimaging findings.
* Age: 18-60 years
Exclusion Criteria
2. severe allergic reaction to iodine contrast or chronic Kidney disease.
3. contraindication to general anesthesia or antiplatelet anticoagulants, Hemorrhagic Diathesis
4. patients with secondary causes of intracranial hypertension: Dural arteriovenous fistula or other arteriovenous lesion affecting cortical venous flow.
5. pregnancy.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Zayed Saber
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hilvert AM, Gauhar F, Longo M, Grimaudo H, Dugan J, Mummareddy N, Chitale R, Froehler MT, Fusco MR. Venous sinus stenting versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting: comparing clinical outcomes for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Nov 22;16(12):1264-1267. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022174.
McGonigal A, Bone I, Teasdale E. Resolution of transverse sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension after L-P shunt. Neurology. 2004 Feb 10;62(3):514-5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.62.3.514. No abstract available.
Subramaniam RM, Tress BM, King JO, Eizenberg N, Mitchell PJ. Transverse sinus septum: a new aetiology of idiopathic intracranial hypertension? Australas Radiol. 2004 Jun;48(2):114-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01269.x.
Aguilar-Perez M, Martinez-Moreno R, Kurre W, Wendl C, Bazner H, Ganslandt O, Unsold R, Henkes H. Endovascular treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results in 51 patients. Neuroradiology. 2017 Mar;59(3):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1783-5. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
Saindane AM, Bruce BB, Riggeal BD, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Association of MRI findings and visual outcome in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Aug;201(2):412-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9638.
Degnan AJ, Levy LM. Pseudotumor cerebri: brief review of clinical syndrome and imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Dec;32(11):1986-93. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2404. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
Brodsky MC, Vaphiades M. Magnetic resonance imaging in pseudotumor cerebri. Ophthalmology. 1998 Sep;105(9):1686-93. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)99039-X.
Kilgore KP, Lee MS, Leavitt JA, Mokri B, Hodge DO, Frank RD, Chen JJ. Re-evaluating the Incidence of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in an Era of Increasing Obesity. Ophthalmology. 2017 May;124(5):697-700. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
Starke RM, Wang T, Ding D, Durst CR, Crowley RW, Chalouhi N, Hasan DM, Dumont AS, Jabbour P, Liu KC. Endovascular Treatment of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Complications, Neurological Outcomes, and Radiographic Results. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:140408. doi: 10.1155/2015/140408. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2002 Nov 26;59(10):1492-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000029570.69134.1b.
Radhakrishnan K, Ahlskog JE, Garrity JA, Kurland LT. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994 Feb;69(2):169-80. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61045-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
intracranial hypertension
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.