MiniLap Vs Standard Laparoscopy in Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA-Mutated Patients

NCT ID: NCT06831747

Last Updated: 2025-02-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-08

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study hypothesis is that surgical treatment performed with MiniLap results in reduced postoperative pain in a population of patients undergoing prophylactic laparoscopic adnexal surgery. The primary objectives are to assess differences in operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications in patients undergoing bilateral laparoscopic adnexectomy performed with standard laparoscopy versus MiniLap. The secondary objectives of this study are to compare postoperative pain and patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcomes.

Patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations undergoing prophylactic surgery will be assigned to either MiniLap or standard laparoscopic treatment based on randomization. Subsequently, the necessary study data will be collected using the hospital's electronic management system and medical records.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

BRCA Mutation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A: Standard laparoscopy

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed with standard laparoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy - S-LPS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In standard laparoscopy (S-LPS), the initial laparoscopic access was performed at the umbilical level using open laparoscopy (Hasson technique). The subsequent accesses were carried out in the right and left iliac fossa. In the S-LPS, these accesses are performed using a 5mm trocars. Finally, a 5mm ancillary trocar was placed in the suprapubic region to use instruments such as bipolar forceps, irrigators, and scissors. The subsequent surgical steps were identical for both techniques.

B: MiniLap

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed with MiniLap

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy - PSS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the MiniLap® Percutaneous Surgical System (PSS), the initial laparoscopic access was performed at the umbilical level using open laparoscopy (Hasson technique). The subsequent two accesses were carried out in the right and left iliac fossa. These latter accesses are directly performed using MiniLap® with a 2.4mm incision. Finally, a 5mm ancillary trocar was placed in the suprapubic region to use instruments such as bipolar forceps, irrigators, and scissors. The subsequent surgical steps were identical for both techniques.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy - S-LPS

In standard laparoscopy (S-LPS), the initial laparoscopic access was performed at the umbilical level using open laparoscopy (Hasson technique). The subsequent accesses were carried out in the right and left iliac fossa. In the S-LPS, these accesses are performed using a 5mm trocars. Finally, a 5mm ancillary trocar was placed in the suprapubic region to use instruments such as bipolar forceps, irrigators, and scissors. The subsequent surgical steps were identical for both techniques.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy - PSS

In the MiniLap® Percutaneous Surgical System (PSS), the initial laparoscopic access was performed at the umbilical level using open laparoscopy (Hasson technique). The subsequent two accesses were carried out in the right and left iliac fossa. These latter accesses are directly performed using MiniLap® with a 2.4mm incision. Finally, a 5mm ancillary trocar was placed in the suprapubic region to use instruments such as bipolar forceps, irrigators, and scissors. The subsequent surgical steps were identical for both techniques.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing prophylactic bilateral adnexectomy via laparoscopic surgery.
* Patients with a germline mutation in the BRCA1/2 gene.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who underwent additional surgery during the adnexectomy procedure.
* Patients in whom an intraoperative frozen section is required.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefano Restaino

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University Hospital of Udine

Udine, Udine, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Stefano Restaino

Role: CONTACT

+390432559653

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Stefano Restaino

Role: primary

+390432559653

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0022677

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Radical Fimbriectomy for Young BRCA Mutation Carriers
NCT01608074 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA