Surgery in Preventing Ovarian Cancer in Patients With Genetic Mutations

NCT ID: NCT02760849

Last Updated: 2026-01-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

374 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-02

Study Completion Date

2041-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase II trial studies how well surgery works in preventing ovarian cancer in patients with genetic mutations at risk of ovarian cancer. Risk reducing salpingo oophorectomy (RRSO) is surgery to remove the fallopian tubes and ovaries at the same time. Interval salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (ISDO) is surgery to remove the fallopian tubes. It is not known whether ISDO works better than RRSO at lowering risk of ovarian cancer and improving the sexual function and psychosocial well-being in patients with genetic mutation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Objectives:

1\. To examine changes in female sexual function with the strategy of interval salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (ISDO) compared to the strategy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for patients who carry genetic mutations that predispose them to ovarian cancer.

Secondary Objectives:

1. To estimate the onset and severity of menopausal symptoms with ISDO compared to RRSO.
2. To estimate quality of life with ISDO compared to RRSO.
3. To examine participants' satisfaction level and cancer worry level with their choice of prophylactic procedures.
4. To estimate the impact of ISDO compared to RRSO on mental health, including depression, anxiety, and sleep quality.
5. To determine the compliance with delayed oophorectomy within the ISDO arm.
6. To estimate the number of fallopian tube, ovarian, primary peritoneal malignancies and other malignancies over the course of the study.
7. To identify common themes regarding influential factors in the decision to undergo risk reducing surgery in premenopausal women at genetic high-risk for ovarian can

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo ISDO.

ARM II: Patients undergo RRSO.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Deleterious BARD1 Gene Mutation Deleterious BRCA1 Gene Mutation Deleterious BRCA2 Gene Mutation Deleterious BRIP1 Gene Mutation Deleterious EPCAM Gene Mutation Deleterious MLH1 Gene Mutation Deleterious MSH2 Gene Mutation Deleterious MSH6 Gene Mutation Deleterious PALB2 Gene Mutation Deleterious PMS2 Gene Mutation Deleterious RAD51C Gene Mutation Deleterious RAD51D Gene Mutation Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Premenopausal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (ISDO)

Patients undergo ISDO.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Oophorectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo ISDO

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Salpingectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo ISDO

Arm II (RRSO)

Patients undergo RRSO.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Correlative studies

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Salpingo-Oophorectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo RRSO

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Oophorectomy

Undergo ISDO

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Salpingectomy

Undergo ISDO

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Salpingo-Oophorectomy

Undergo RRSO

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Female Castration Ovariectomy Quality of Life Assessment Tubal Excision

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Women must be ≥ 30 and ≤ 50 years of age.
2. Premenopausal women with a documented deleterious mutation in one of the following ovarian cancer genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BARD1, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2, or EPCAM. Menopause is defined as ≥ 12 months of amenorrhea. However, for those patients with ≥ 12 months of amenorrhea who may be pre-menopausal, levels of FSH, LH, and estradiol in the pre-menopausal range will be acceptable.
3. Willing to undergo two surgical procedures (if chooses the ISDO arm).
4. Presence of at least 1 fallopian tube and 1 ovary. Prior unilateral salpingectomy is allowed; prior bilateral salpingectomy is not allowed
5. Patients who have undergone a prior tubal ligation will be eligible.
6. Participants may have a personal history of non-ovarian malignancy, but must:

1. Be without evidence of disease at enrollment
2. Remain premenopausal
3. Have completed treatment (including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonal therapy) \> 3 months prior to enrollment (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
7. Willingness to return to the enrolling site for the study surgical procedures, including pre-operative and post-operative care.

Patients in the ISDO arm must be willing to return to the enrolling site for yearly ovarian cancer assessment.
8. Patients must understand that they will be permanently sterilized

Exclusion Criteria

1. Women with a personal history of ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.
2. Current treatment with Tamoxifen or Aromatase Inhibitors.
3. Medical comorbidities making surgery unsafe as determined by the patient's surgeon.
4. Women who are pregnant or post-partum (within 3 months of delivery).

* Patients are deemed not pregnant by virtue of urine pregnancy test (UPT), transvaginal ultrasound, beta HCG, or best judgment of the investigator. Pregnancy testing is not required per protocol to determine study eligibility.
* Women who become pregnant on the ISDO arm via reproductive technology can remain on study. However, data collection will be suspended during pregnancy and 3 months post-partum.
5. Women with elevated levels of CA125 (\>50) or transvaginal ultrasound suggesting cancer, unless findings are consistent with endometriosis. CA125 and transvaginal ultrasounds must be the most recent, but no older than 1 year from the date of enrollment.
6. Inability to provide informed consent.
7. Inability to read or speak English.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roni N Wilke, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mdanderson.org

WISP University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-0814

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCI-2016-00778

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015-0814

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optical Biopsy and Fallopian Tube
NCT02365779 COMPLETED NA