Surgery in Preventing Ovarian Cancer in Patients With Genetic Mutations
NCT ID: NCT02760849
Last Updated: 2026-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
374 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-02
2041-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TUBectomy With Delayed Oophorectomy in High Risk Women to Assess the Safety of Prevention
NCT04294927
Early Salpingectomy (Tubectomy) With Delayed Oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 Gene Mutation Carriers
NCT02321228
Risk-Reducing Surgeries for Hereditary Ovarian Cancer
NCT03294343
Radical Fimbriectomy for Young BRCA Mutation Carriers
NCT01608074
Fallopian Tube Removal as a Method of Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Descriptive Study
NCT01544049
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1\. To examine changes in female sexual function with the strategy of interval salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (ISDO) compared to the strategy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for patients who carry genetic mutations that predispose them to ovarian cancer.
Secondary Objectives:
1. To estimate the onset and severity of menopausal symptoms with ISDO compared to RRSO.
2. To estimate quality of life with ISDO compared to RRSO.
3. To examine participants' satisfaction level and cancer worry level with their choice of prophylactic procedures.
4. To estimate the impact of ISDO compared to RRSO on mental health, including depression, anxiety, and sleep quality.
5. To determine the compliance with delayed oophorectomy within the ISDO arm.
6. To estimate the number of fallopian tube, ovarian, primary peritoneal malignancies and other malignancies over the course of the study.
7. To identify common themes regarding influential factors in the decision to undergo risk reducing surgery in premenopausal women at genetic high-risk for ovarian can
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo ISDO.
ARM II: Patients undergo RRSO.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (ISDO)
Patients undergo ISDO.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Oophorectomy
Undergo ISDO
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Salpingectomy
Undergo ISDO
Arm II (RRSO)
Patients undergo RRSO.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Salpingo-Oophorectomy
Undergo RRSO
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Oophorectomy
Undergo ISDO
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Salpingectomy
Undergo ISDO
Salpingo-Oophorectomy
Undergo RRSO
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Premenopausal women with a documented deleterious mutation in one of the following ovarian cancer genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BARD1, MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2, or EPCAM. Menopause is defined as ≥ 12 months of amenorrhea. However, for those patients with ≥ 12 months of amenorrhea who may be pre-menopausal, levels of FSH, LH, and estradiol in the pre-menopausal range will be acceptable.
3. Willing to undergo two surgical procedures (if chooses the ISDO arm).
4. Presence of at least 1 fallopian tube and 1 ovary. Prior unilateral salpingectomy is allowed; prior bilateral salpingectomy is not allowed
5. Patients who have undergone a prior tubal ligation will be eligible.
6. Participants may have a personal history of non-ovarian malignancy, but must:
1. Be without evidence of disease at enrollment
2. Remain premenopausal
3. Have completed treatment (including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormonal therapy) \> 3 months prior to enrollment (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
7. Willingness to return to the enrolling site for the study surgical procedures, including pre-operative and post-operative care.
Patients in the ISDO arm must be willing to return to the enrolling site for yearly ovarian cancer assessment.
8. Patients must understand that they will be permanently sterilized
Exclusion Criteria
2. Current treatment with Tamoxifen or Aromatase Inhibitors.
3. Medical comorbidities making surgery unsafe as determined by the patient's surgeon.
4. Women who are pregnant or post-partum (within 3 months of delivery).
* Patients are deemed not pregnant by virtue of urine pregnancy test (UPT), transvaginal ultrasound, beta HCG, or best judgment of the investigator. Pregnancy testing is not required per protocol to determine study eligibility.
* Women who become pregnant on the ISDO arm via reproductive technology can remain on study. However, data collection will be suspended during pregnancy and 3 months post-partum.
5. Women with elevated levels of CA125 (\>50) or transvaginal ultrasound suggesting cancer, unless findings are consistent with endometriosis. CA125 and transvaginal ultrasounds must be the most recent, but no older than 1 year from the date of enrollment.
6. Inability to provide informed consent.
7. Inability to read or speak English.
30 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roni N Wilke, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone
New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
WISP University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-0814
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCI-2016-00778
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2015-0814
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.