Assessing Remote Confirmation of Type 1 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT06821360

Last Updated: 2025-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-03

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this research is to assess the practicalities and potential benefits of collecting home finger prick samples from all patients within a hospital type 1 diabetes service to test how much insulin each patient is producing. To do this we will send detailed study information, sample collection kits and reply-paid return packs to 1500 randomly selected patients, treated as type 1 diabetes, in a hospital clinic (3000 patients in the whole clinic). We will ask participants to consent to take part (either online or by completing a paper consent form returned with their pack) before collecting a finger prick blood sample. We will ask participants to collect the sample between 1 and 5 hours after a meal and to check and record their blood glucose level at the same time. Participants will then return the sample and glucose result, using the pre-paid pack provided, to the hospital clinic laboratory for a test called C-peptide (a measure of how much of their own insulin they are producing). The sample collection process should take no longer than 10 minutes.

We will record the percentage of patients returning samples within 4 weeks of initial contact and determine the number of cases with high C-peptide suggestive of non-type 1 diabetes. If this study shows remote C-peptide testing is a practical and acceptable to patients, it could allow this remote service to be offered to all type 1 diabetes clinics in every hospital in the United Kingdom. An estimated 350,000 people in the United Kingdom have type 1 diabetes. Reclassifying an estimated 1 in 15 people would mean approximately 23,000 people nationally could benefit from being identified as potentially able to stop insulin treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background It can be hard to diagnose type 1 diabetes in adults because the symptoms can overlap with type 2 diabetes and misclassification of type 2 and type 1 diabetes can occur. This matters as type 2 diabetes cases misclassified as having type 1 diabetes potentially receive a lifetime of unnecessary insulin treatment without access to the effective treatment strategies for type 2 diabetes. Whether someone needs treating as type 1 diabetes can be confirmed by measuring their insulin levels using a test called C-peptide. This should be measured when diabetes is longstanding (over 3 years diabetes duration) as, at diagnosis levels of insulin secretion can overlap in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. A study in Scotland measured C-peptide in a clinic of patients with long standing treatment as type 1 diabetes showing around 1 in 15 of cases did not have type 1 diabetes.

As a result, in Scotland all those with longstanding type 1 diabetes now have C-peptide measured and this is likely to be recommended across the UK. For newly diagnosed cases this will occur prospectively as part of patients' ongoing type 1 diabetes care. However, for existing cases, each hospital will need to test C-peptide, on a blood sample collected from a vein, in all patients in their type 1 diabetes clinic. In addition to the burden on clinical staff to collect the samples, this C-peptide test is not measured in many UK laboratories so co-ordinating this testing on all patients within a clinic will be extremely challenging.

We have recently validated a method of testing C-peptide on capillary blood (finger prick) samples. Importantly these can be collected by a patient at their home and can be posted back to any UK laboratory where C-peptide measurement is available. Using this approach means that clinic visits for blood collection are not required and testing can be co-ordinated from a central location, making organising testing in a whole clinic much more straightforward.

Study Aims \& Participation The aim of this research is to assess the practicalities \& potential benefits of collecting home finger prick samples from all patients within a hospital type 1 diabetes service to test how much insulin each patient is producing. To do this we will send detailed study information, sample collection kits and reply-paid return packs to 1500 randomly selected patients from a type 1 diabetes clinic (3000 patients in the whole clinic). We will ask participants to consent to take part (either online or by completing a paper consent form returned with their pack) before collecting a finger prick blood sample. We will ask participants to collect the sample between 1 and 5 hours after a meal and to check and record their blood glucose level at the same time. Participants would then return the sample and glucose result, using the pre-paid pack provided to the hospital clinic laboratory for a test called C-peptide (a measure of how much of their own insulin a person is producing). The sample collection process should take no longer than 10 minutes.

We will record the percentage of patients returning samples within 4 weeks of initial contact and determine the number of cases with high C-peptide suggestive of non-type 1 diabetes. If this study shows remote C-peptide testing is practical, and acceptable to patients, it could lead to remote testing being offered at all type 1 diabetes clinics in every hospital in the United Kingdom. Diabetes UK estimates around 350,000 people in the United Kingdom have type 1 diabetes. Reclassifying 1 in 15 people would mean approximately 23,000 people nationally could benefit from being identified as potentially able to stop insulin treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Main Cohort

Adults treated as Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and under the clinical care of the specialist diabetes team(s) at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. Diabetes duration \>3 years at the time of study participation. Aged \> 18 at the time of study participation.

C-peptide test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Participants collect a single home finger-prick sample and post to the clinical laboratory for C-peptide analysis (a measure of endogenous insulin production).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

C-peptide test

Participants collect a single home finger-prick sample and post to the clinical laboratory for C-peptide analysis (a measure of endogenous insulin production).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a Type 1 diabetes follow up code OR rapid progression to insulin (within 3 years of diagnosis) to capture miscoded cases.
* Under the clinical care of the diabetes team(s) at the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
* Duration of diabetes \>3 years
* Aged 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients considered by their clinical care team to be unsuitable/inappropriate to be invited to take part in this research (e.g. severe sight impairment, reduced capacity to consent)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicholas Thomas, PhD MRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Exeter and Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility

Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2410662

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

338864

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fr1da Insulin Intervention
NCT02620072 COMPLETED PHASE2