Telemedicine for Nonspecific Neck Pain

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-10

Study Completion Date

2025-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brief Summary

Neck pain is a common global health issue, often classified as nonspecific neck pain when no specific cause is identified. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of telemedicine (which involves providing home exercises and recommendations through pre-recorded exercise videos and remote follow-up) versus conventional care (which involves providing home exercises and recommendations through informational brochures and in-person follow-ups) for patients with nonspecific neck pain. Participants will be randomly assigned to either group. The primary outcomes are pain intensity (VAS) and neck function (NDI), with secondary outcomes including exercise adherence, patient satisfaction, and time and distance spent for in-patient follow-ups.

The study hypothesizes that telemedicine will result in greater pain reduction, improved neck function, and higher patient satisfaction due to the convenience and accessibility of video-based exercises. If proven effective, telemedicine could reduce hospital crowding, minimize infection risks, save time and money, and reduce environmental impacts, making it a valuable tool in non-serious pathologies and during events like pandemics.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Feasibility and Impact of a Tele-rehabilitation Program in Patients With Chronic and Non-specific Neck Pain

NCT04841642

Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain

COMPLETED NA

Effectiveness of A Telehealth Postural Awareness Program Combined With Exercise In People With Neck Pain

NCT05509491

Neck Pain

COMPLETED NA

The Effect of Telerehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

NCT04752488

Chronic Neck Pain

COMPLETED NA

Muscle Energy Techniques and Self-Stretching in Nonspecific Neck Pain

NCT06199063

Nonspecific Neck Pain Exercise

COMPLETED NA

Effectiveness of a Self-rehabilitation Program

NCT02549274

Cervicalgia

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neck pain is a very common public health problem worldwide. It is defined as pain perceived between the upper nuchal line and the spinous process of the first thoracic vertebra. This pain can sometimes be reflected to the head, trunk and upper extremities. Nonspecific neck pain refers to neck pain for which no specific cause or underlying disease can be identified. It is generally used to refer to neck pain that cannot be attributed to conditions such as infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory disorder or radicular symptoms. Although many interventions have been recommended for neck pain in the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) clinical practice guideline, the only interventions recommended based on strong evidence are coordination, strengthening, endurance exercises, cervical mobilization/manipulation and patient education. Other interventions are based on weak or moderate evidence. In neck pain syndromes, exercise therapy is primarily recommended for neck pain without signs of major structural pathology. In fact, exercise therapy has surpassed physical therapy modalities compared to the past. While exercise, mobilization, and manipulation treatments for non-specific neck pain have the greatest support in the literature, there is little evidence for the effectiveness of thermal treatments and electrical therapies, with no evidence of more than a temporary benefit.

This study aims to compare the telemedicine method, in which asynchronous exercise videos (tele-exercise) and educational videos containing recommendations (tele-education) are sent to patients' phones, and patients are followed up by physicians via remote video calls (tele-consultation), with the conventional follow-up method, in which patients are given a brochure containing the same exercises and recommendations, and patients are followed up by physicians via face-to-face meetings in the hospital.

Participants will consist of patients diagnosed with non-specific neck pain for at least 3 months. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A (Telemedicine Group) and Group B (Conventional Follow-up Group). The study content will be explained to the patients on the first day at the hospital and they will be asked to sign a voluntary consent form. Patients in Group A will receive a pre-recorded neck exercise video and an educational video sent to their phones by the physician. These patients will exercise at home three times a day for 3 months. They were told to mark the exercise diary provided to them when they do their exercises for 2 weeks. They will have remote check-ups via video call on the 15th day, 30th day and 3rd month to monitor pain intensity and provide support. Patients in Group B will receive an exercise brochure and an educational brochure provided by the physician in person at the clinic. These patients will also be advised to exercise at home three times a day for 3 months. For 2 weeks period they were told to mark the exercise diary provided to them when they do their exercises. They will have clinical check-ups on the 15th day, 30th day and 3rd month to monitor pain intensity and provide support. The primary outcome measures are pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and neck function assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary outcome measures are adherence to the exercise program monitored through an exercise diary, patient satisfaction assessed on a Likert scale from 0 to 5, and distance in kilometers and time in hours or minutes (spent on the road to hospital) for Group B.

VAS and NDI will be measured initially for both groups through face-to-face assessments, and total distance and time spent on transportation will be calculated for Group B. In 15th day, VAS will be administered through video interviews (Group A) and face-to-face assessments (Group B). In addition, completed exercise diaries will be collected via WhatsApp (Group A) or clinic visits (Group B). In 30th day, VAS and in 3rd month VAS, NDI and patient satisfaction will be assessed through video interviews (Group A) and face-to-face assessments (Group B).

Participants will be unaware of the procedures used in the other group and the outcome assessor will be blinded to group assignments during the statistical analysis to prevent bias. Adherence will be monitored through exercise diaries and qualitative feedback will be collected through surveys or interviews to understand patient experiences and compliance difficulties. Sample size will be determined based on power analysis.

The primary hypothesis (H1) is that Group A will show greater improvement in pain reduction and neck function than Group B due to the more accurate implementation of video exercises and advice than visual exercises and advice. The secondary hypothesis (H2) is that Group A will show higher adherence and satisfaction due to the ease of video-based exercises and the lack of a hospital visit.

This study will be the first scientific study to compare the telemedicine method with the conventional method. If the telemedicine method shows an effectiveness this method can be widely used in the future, this will provide great convenience for both clinicians and patients, reduce the density in hospital polyclinics and reduce the risk of contamination in healthcare areas. Telemedicine applications that can be performed remotely in diseases that do not involve serious pathology provide significant advantages to both individuals and health insurance systems in terms of time (time spent on the road, waiting time in the hospital, etc.) and financial expenses (transportation and healthcare expenses, etc.). In addition, these methods reduce air pollution by reducing traffic density and gasoline consumption, thus minimizing environmental impacts. The spread of telemedicine applications also stands out as an effective medical option in unexpected quarantine conditions such as pandemics.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain Exercise Telemedicine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized controlled clinical study

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Participants will be unaware of the procedures used in the other group. Additionally, the outcome assessor will be blinded to group assignments during the statistical analysis to prevent bias.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Telemedicine Group

Patients will receive pre-recorded neck exercise and educational videos sent to their phones by the physician. They will follow the exercise routine at home three times a day for 2 weeks, based on the provided videos. They will mark the exercise diary given to them when they do their exercises. They will be advised to continue exercise program for 3 months. Additionally, the physician will conduct video calls to monitor their pain levels and offer support at the 15th day, 30th day and the 3rd month of the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Home exercise and recommendations for nonspecific neck pain

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention involves neck exercises and recommendations for nonspecific neck pain. Patients will perform the exercises at home three times a day for 2 weeks and record their progress in an exercise diary. They will be monitored by a physician for pain levels and receive additional support at the 15th day, 30th day and 3rd months.

Conventional Follow-up Group

Patients will receive an exercise brochure and a brochure with educational recommendations given by a physician face-to-face in the clinic. These patients will follow the exercise routine at home three times a day for 2 weeks, based on the provided brochures. They will mark the exercise diary given to them when they do their exercises. They will also be advised to continue exercises for 3 months. They will be come to clinic check-ups to monitor pain intensity and provide support at the 15th day, 30th day and the 3rd month of the study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Home exercise and recommendations for nonspecific neck pain

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention involves neck exercises and recommendations for nonspecific neck pain. Patients will perform the exercises at home three times a day for 2 weeks and record their progress in an exercise diary. They will be monitored by a physician for pain levels and receive additional support at the 15th day, 30th day and 3rd months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Home exercise and recommendations for nonspecific neck pain

The intervention involves neck exercises and recommendations for nonspecific neck pain. Patients will perform the exercises at home three times a day for 2 weeks and record their progress in an exercise diary. They will be monitored by a physician for pain levels and receive additional support at the 15th day, 30th day and 3rd months.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Non-specific neck pain for at least 3 months (neck pain without a specific underlying cause such as infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory disorder or radicular symptoms)
* Clinical and/or radiological presence of one of the following diagnoses: cervicalgia, cervical flattening, cervical arthrosis, cervical discopathy
* Able to understand and apply the given exercises; literate and therefore able to read and interpret the given brochure; familiar with smartphones, tablets and computers, able to use them easily, able to open and watch sent videos, have internet access

Exclusion Criteria

* Having a cognitive disorder
* Red flag findings indicating serious pathology, recent trauma to the neck region, fracture, lysis, listhesis, spinal mass and malignancy, syringomyelia, presence of canal stenosis
* Having undergone surgery in the cervical region
* Having received injections to the neck and back region in the last 3 months
* Having received physical therapy or home exercise recommendations in the same hospital or in another center in the last 3 months
* Not having their own smartphone or smart tablet and/or uninterrupted internet access
* Having a visual impairment
* Having an upper extremity amputation
* Having advanced cancer, receiving cancer treatment
* Having complicated diabetes

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes