This Project At LMU Looks At How Using AI 2nd Opinion Report to Analyze Retinal Eye Scans Impact Doctors' Decisions About Treatment for Patients with a Specific Eye Disease (nAMD)
NCT ID: NCT06817915
Last Updated: 2025-02-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-30
2026-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will involve up to 1000 ophthalmologists with varying levels of expertise. These ophthalmologists will review SD-OCT scans and make treatment decisions before and after reviewing AI-generated reports. The primary objective is to compare these decisions and see how the AI reports influence them. Secondary objectives include assessing the accuracy and safety of the AI reports.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Artificial Intelligence-Aided Screening for Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-related Macular Degeneration in Family Medicine and Geriatric Medicine Outpatient Clinics
NCT07069647
Personalized Monitoring of Non-foveal, Non-vision Compromising Atrophic Age-related Macular Degeneration With Artificial Intelligence and Identification of Disease Progression
NCT06351657
Comparing Artificial Intelligence for Assisted Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy
NCT06423274
An Assistant Model for Anti-VEGF Therapy Decision
NCT07328776
Imaging of the Angiofibrotic Switch in Neovascular AMD
NCT03838679
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The core of the research involves assessing the impact of AI-generated 2nd opinion reports on ophthalmologists' treatment decisions for nAMD. Participants will review SD-OCT scans and make initial treatment decisions. Subsequently, they will review AI-generated reports for the same scans and have the opportunity to revise their decisions. This process aims to evaluate the influence of AI insights on clinical judgment.
The project will be conducted virtually, with participants enrolling online from various countries. Data collection will be facilitated through an electronic system, ensuring efficiency and security. Statistical analysis will primarily involve descriptive statistics to summarize the findings. The results of the study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AI 2nd opinion assisted assessment of SD-OCT scan
Ophthalmologists assess patient SD-OCT scans before and after reviewing AI-2nd opinion reports
AI assisted assessment of SD-OCT scans
AI 2nd opinion report on nAMD treatment planning
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AI assisted assessment of SD-OCT scans
AI 2nd opinion report on nAMD treatment planning
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Criteria to be included in one of the following six Ophthalmology user groups:
Group 1 Non-retina specialist Group: Ophthalmology, completed ophthalmology residence with no or another subspecialty other than retina (e.g., Glaucoma, refractive, etc) Group 2 Resident Group: \<5 years in residency in ophthalmology Group 3 Fellow Group: Retina specialist in training Group: in fellowship in vitreoretinal medicine, medical retina Group 4 Retina specialist Group: completed retina training, regular requalification Group 5 Junior reader Group: have already gained experience in the reporting clinical routine with the diagnostics in question and completed the initial certification process at an Image and Reading Center (acc. to centre's SOP) Group 6 Senior reader Group: specialist with several years of experience in the relevant field or have completed at least 3 years of residency training. Completed the certification process at the Image and Reading Center (acc. to centre's SOP)
Exclusion Criteria
* Does not have time to participate in the estimated project duration of 30 minutes.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Deepeye Medical GmbH
INDUSTRY
Technomics Research
INDUSTRY
M3 Macula Monitor Muenster
UNKNOWN
Johannes Schiefelbein
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johannes Schiefelbein
Co-Project Lead
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Director the Eye Clinic
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
LMU Klinikum Eye Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
LMU Klinikum
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Siegfried Priglinger, Prof Dr med
Role: backup
Johannes Schiefelbein
Role: backup
Ben Asani
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chopra R, Preston GC, Keenan TDL, Mulholland P, Patel PJ, Balaskas K, Hamilton RD, Keane PA. Intravitreal injections: past trends and future projections within a UK tertiary hospital. Eye (Lond). 2022 Jul;36(7):1373-1378. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01646-3. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2301LMUASSIST
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.