Clinical Evaluation of VeriSee AMD in Screening for Age-Related Macular Degeneration
NCT ID: NCT05593913
Last Updated: 2024-01-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
986 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-17
2022-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations of AI-Assisted Diagnostic Software (VeriSee) for Ophthalmic Disease Screening
NCT06843499
Artificial Intelligence-Aided Screening for Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-related Macular Degeneration in Family Medicine and Geriatric Medicine Outpatient Clinics
NCT07069647
A Single-center, Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of Artificial Intelligence Medical Assisted Diagnostic Software (VeriSee DR) for Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
NCT04160988
Telemedicine in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
NCT04863391
Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) - Usability Study
NCT00963339
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Potential subjects with images of color fundus photography will be selected for eligibility, and then the ophthalmologist further confirms the images with legible quality. Three independent ophthalmologists (or evaluators) having more than 6 years of experience in retina will evaluate AMD from the color fundus photography images with different sequences of images independently. These three evaluators are different from the ophthalmologist who is responsible for deciding subject's eligibility. The evaluators determine the severity of AMD based on the four-level scale which is the AMD Severity Scale stated in Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Report No. 6. Before the study, the training section is necessary to ensure the consensus of the AMD severity grading among three evaluators. The severity determined by the majority of the grade the three evaluators gave is considered the gold/reference standard in this study. Therefore, level 1 and level 2 are classified as non-mtl3AMD, while level 3 and advanced AMD (level 4) are classified as mtl3AMD. The clinical performance displayed as sensitivity and specificity will be determined by comparing the AMD results between VeriSee AMD and the gold standard.
VeriSee AMD is intended to screen AMD from the images taken by color fundus photography, which can assist the physicians to assess whether further examination for retinopathy by the ophthalmologist is needed. The screening result of AMD will be non-mtl3AMD or mtl3AMD for the physicians' reference and does not intend to diagnose AMD, detect concomitant diseases, or treat AMD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject with image taken by color fundus photography that meet the following requirement:
1. The resolution of image is 271x271 pixels or higher;
2. The angle view of image is 45 or 50 degree.
* Subject's image includes macula as judged by the ophthalmologist.
Exclusion Criteria
* The macula or other part in the image of color fundus photography is unclear to determine the disease condition as judged by the ophthalmologist.
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Acer Medical Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AHCI21001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.