CONTinuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Dosing of ceftaZidime/AVIbactam in Critically Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT06811727

Last Updated: 2025-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-01

Study Completion Date

2027-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is an essential treatment option for managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative (G-) bacteria, including Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48 and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients frequently exhibit altered pharmacokinetics (PK) of CZA, potentially compromising optimal PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target attainment with standard dosing regimens. This study compares the efficacy of continuous infusion (CI) versus conventional intermittent dosing (ID) of CZA in critically ill ICU patients with severe infections caused by K. pneumoniae OXA-48 or P. aeruginosa.

This single-centre, randomized, open-label trial will be conducted at a tertiary care hospital within the University Hospital Centre in Zagreb, Croatia, with a 1:1 allocation ratio. One hundred forty critically ill ICU patients requiring CZA treatment will be randomized to receive either ID (2 g/0.5 g every 8 hours over 2 hours) or an equivalent dose in CI (6 g/1.5 g continuously over 24 hours).

The primary outcome is the microbiological success rate. Secondary outcomes include clinical success rate, time to symptom improvement, length of ICU and hospital stay, 28-day all-cause mortality, pathogen recurrence rate, time to weaning from mechanical ventilation, cumulative vasoactive-inotropic score, adverse events, and the ratio of ceftazidime plasma concentration to the pathogen's minimum inhibitory concentration (C/MIC).

This trial seeks to provide evidence on the optimal administration strategy for CZA in critically ill ICU patients with severe infections due to MDR G- pathogens.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Patients will not be informed of their group assignment to maintain study integrity. We opted for this study design, which is not fully blinded, for several practical and clinical reasons. First, the dosing regimen of the drug is complex. According to the SmPC, ceftazidime/avibactam is administered as a prolonged infusion over 2 hours every 8 hours. In a placebo-controlled design, all patients would require an additional infusion, either placebo or the active drug, following the initial 2-hour infusion. By not including a placebo, the control group will follow the SmPC dosing regimen (2-hour infusions every 8 hours), while the intervention group will receive the drug as a continuous infusion over 24 hours. Second, the study involves administration in cardiac and cardiac surgery intensive care units, where patients are at a more significant risk of volume overload. The study was designed without a placebo-controlled arm to minimise unnecessary fluid administration.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuos ceftazidime/avibactam infusion

Continuous infusion will include a loading dose of 2 g/0.5 g administered over 2 hours, followed by continuous infusion of 6 g/1.5 g over 24 hours, equivalent to 0.25 g of ceftazidime per hour. The drug reconstitution and dilution process are shown in Figure 2. The final volume of a solution of CZA will be 50 mL, which gives the concentration of ceftazidime 40 mg/mL, with a 4:1 concentration ratio for avibactam (10 mg/mL). The solution will be administered via an infusion syringe with an infusion rate of 6.25 mL/h. Dose adjustments will be applied according to renal function, calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuos ceftazidime/avibactam infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous infusion will include a loading dose of 2 g/0.5 g administered over 2 hours, followed by continuous infusion of 6 g/1.5 g over 24 hours, equivalent to 0.25 g of ceftazidime per hour. The drug reconstitution and dilution process are shown in Figure 2. The final volume of solution of CZA will be 50 mL, which gives concentration of ceftazidime of 40 mg/mL, with 4:1 concentration ratio for avibactam (10 mg/mL). The solution will be administered via an infusion syringe, with an infusion rate of 6.25 mL/h. Dose adjustments will be applied according to renal function, calculated using Cockroft-Gault formula

Intermitent dosing as per SMPC

Intermittent dosing, as outlined in the SmPC, consists of 2 g/0.5 g administered by prolonged infusion over 2 hours every 8 hours. Dose adjustments will be applied according to renal function, calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intermitent dosing as per SMPC

Intervention Type DRUG

Intermittent dosing, as outlined in the SmPC, consists of 2 g/0.5 g administered by prolonged infusion over 2 hours every 8 hours. Dose adjustments will be applied according to renal function, calculated using Cockroft-Gault formula.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuos ceftazidime/avibactam infusion

Continuous infusion will include a loading dose of 2 g/0.5 g administered over 2 hours, followed by continuous infusion of 6 g/1.5 g over 24 hours, equivalent to 0.25 g of ceftazidime per hour. The drug reconstitution and dilution process are shown in Figure 2. The final volume of solution of CZA will be 50 mL, which gives concentration of ceftazidime of 40 mg/mL, with 4:1 concentration ratio for avibactam (10 mg/mL). The solution will be administered via an infusion syringe, with an infusion rate of 6.25 mL/h. Dose adjustments will be applied according to renal function, calculated using Cockroft-Gault formula

Intervention Type DRUG

Intermitent dosing as per SMPC

Intermittent dosing, as outlined in the SmPC, consists of 2 g/0.5 g administered by prolonged infusion over 2 hours every 8 hours. Dose adjustments will be applied according to renal function, calculated using Cockroft-Gault formula.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. General

1. Age above or equal to 18 years of age.
2. Able to provide informed consent personally or by his/her next of kin, as requested by the Ethics Committee.
2. Disease-specific

1. Critically ill patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit (medical or surgical).
2. Diagnosed with severe infections.
3. At least one microbiological sample positive for Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48 or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
4. Requiring a prescription for ceftazidime/avibactam, by clinical judgement

Exclusion Criteria

1. General

1. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to ceftazidime/avibactam, excipients, or any other cephalosporin antibacterial agent. Severe hypersensitivity (e.g. anaphylactic reaction, severe skin reaction) to any other β-lactam antibacterial agent (e.g. penicillins, monobactams or carbapenems).
2. Withdrawal of informed consent.
3. Age above 85 years of age.
4. Female who is pregnant or breast-feeding.
5. Participation (i.e. signed informed consent) in any other interventional clinical trial of an approved or non-approved antibacterial agent within 30 days before screening.
6. Any disorder which, in the investigator's opinion, might jeopardize the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol.
2. Laboratory values

1\. Severe neutropenia before or during ceftazidime/avibactam administration.
3. Medical conditions

1. Death within 48 hours following randomization.
2. Concomitant acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
3. Presence or history of malignant neoplasms or in situ carcinomas.
4. Duration of ceftazidime/avibactam administration is shorter than 72 hours.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UHC Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daniel Lovrić

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mirna Momčilović

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ivan Šitum, MD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ivan Šitum, MD

subinvestigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ivan Šitum, MD

Role: CONTACT

0915143620

Daniel Lovrić, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

385914488350

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17695343 (View on PubMed)

Servais H, Tulkens PM. Stability and compatibility of ceftazidime administered by continuous infusion to intensive care patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Sep;45(9):2643-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2643-2647.2001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11502544 (View on PubMed)

Gatti M, Pea F. Continuous versus intermittent infusion of antibiotics in Gram-negative multidrug-resistant infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 1;34(6):737-747. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000755.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34261906 (View on PubMed)

Adembri C, Novelli A, Nobili S. Some Suggestions from PK/PD Principles to Contain Resistance in the Clinical Setting-Focus on ICU Patients and Gram-Negative Strains. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 6;9(10):676. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9100676.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33036190 (View on PubMed)

Lorente L, Jimenez A, Palmero S, Jimenez JJ, Iribarren JL, Santana M, Martin MM, Mora ML. Comparison of clinical cure rates in adults with ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with intravenous ceftazidime administered by continuous or intermittent infusion: a retrospective, nonrandomized, open-label, historical chart review. Clin Ther. 2007 Nov;29(11):2433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18158083 (View on PubMed)

Gomez CM, Cordingly JJ, Palazzo MG. Altered pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in critically ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jul;43(7):1798-802. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.7.1798.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10390248 (View on PubMed)

Muller AE, Punt N, Mouton JW. Optimal exposures of ceftazidime predict the probability of microbiological and clinical outcome in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Apr;68(4):900-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks468. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23190766 (View on PubMed)

Ali A, Imran M, Sial S, Khan A. Effective antibiotic dosing in the presence of resistant strains. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275762. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36215219 (View on PubMed)

Ghazi IM, El Nekidy WS. Editorial: Advances in antimicrobial therapy and combating resistance. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 16;14:1170289. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1170289. eCollection 2023. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37007043 (View on PubMed)

Batchelder JI, Hare PJ, Mok WWK. Resistance-resistant antibacterial treatment strategies. Front Antibiot. 2023;2:1093156. doi: 10.3389/frabi.2023.1093156. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36845830 (View on PubMed)

Poole K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to the max. Front Microbiol. 2011 Apr 5;2:65. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00065. eCollection 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21747788 (View on PubMed)

Bonomo RA, Burd EM, Conly J, Limbago BM, Poirel L, Segre JA, Westblade LF. Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: A Global Scourge. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 3;66(8):1290-1297. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix893.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29165604 (View on PubMed)

Chen T, Xu H, Chen Y, Ji J, Ying C, Liu Z, Xu H, Zhou K, Xiao Y, Shen P. Identification and Characterization of OXA-232-Producing Sequence Type 231 Multidrug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains Causing Bloodstream Infections in China. Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Mar 22;11(2):e0260722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02607-22. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36946763 (View on PubMed)

Garcia-Gonzalez N, Fuster B, Tormo N, Salvador C, Gimeno C, Gonzalez-Candelas F. Genomic analysis of the initial dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clones in a tertiary hospital. Microb Genom. 2023 Jun;9(6):mgen001032. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001032.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37272914 (View on PubMed)

Ceron S, Salem-Bango Z, Contreras DA, Ranson EL, Yang S. Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with Concurrent Production of NDM and OXA-48-like Carbapenemases in Southern California, 2016-2022. Microorganisms. 2023 Jun 30;11(7):1717. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071717.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37512889 (View on PubMed)

European Medicines Agency (EMA). Summary of Product Characteristics - Zavicefta 2 g/ 0.5 g powder for concentrate for solution for infusion. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/zavicefta-epar-product-information_en.pdf. (accessed 9.11.2024.)

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Momcilovic M, Situm I, Erceg A, Siroglavic M, Lovric M, Nizic Nodilo L, Hafner A, Lovric J, Turcic P, Fabijanovic D, Marinic A, Nedeljkovic V, Pasalic M, Percin L, Sipus D, Milicic D, Lovric D. Continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of ceftazidime/avibactam in critically ill patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48 or Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a single-center randomized open-label trial (ZAVICONT). Rationale and design. Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 7;16:1618987. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1618987. eCollection 2025.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40852616 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZAVICONT01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Therapeutic Options for CRAB
NCT06440304 RECRUITING PHASE4