Is Methenamine Prophylaxis for Urinary Tract Infection After Midurethral Sling as Effective as Antibiotic Prophylaxis?

NCT ID: NCT06810687

Last Updated: 2025-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

190 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-30

Study Completion Date

2028-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects at least 40% of women in the United States. Synthetic polypropylene mid-urethral slings (MUS) are the gold standard treatment for SUI. Post-operative urinary tract infections (UTI) are one of the most common complications after MUS placement. Some studies have demonstrated that MUS placement can increase the risk of UTI up to 21-34%.

Post-operative UTI can lead to significant healthcare and patient burden. This additional burden further contributes to an estimated annual cost of $1.6 billion for UTI management in the United States. With increased antibiotic usage, there is simultaneous increase in bacterial resistance leading to treatment refractory UTI.

The investigators prescribe post-operative antibiotics prophylactically for 3 days after MUS placement with or without concurrent pelvic reconstructive surgery based on prior literature recommending post-operative prophylaxis. There is a greater emphasis on limiting antibiotic use given the trend of development of bacterial resistance. There are studies supporting alternatives such as methenamine for recurrent UTI prophylaxis treatment, but there are limited studies evaluating methenamine for UTI prophylaxis after MUS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Synthetic polypropylene mid-urethral slings (MUS) are the gold standard for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The most common post-operative complications are urinary tract infection (UTI), bladder injury, bleeding, and mesh erosion. Amongst these complications, post-operative urinary tract infections are the most common complication with incidences up to 21-34%. With high incidences in post-operative UTI, previous studies have shown evidence for the use of prophylactic antibiotics after MUS placement. Previous studies have demonstrated prophylactic antibiotics after MUS placement decreased the incidence of post-operative UTI in the treated groups. While the use of post-operative prophylactic antibiotics may decrease the risk of post-operative UTI, it is essential to consider the broader implication of such antibiotic use.

Along with increased antibiotic use, there is an increase in multidrug resistant uropathogens. This has led to an increased emphasis on antibiotic stewardship to optimize patient care by minimizing the risk of developing antibiotic resistant organisms, preserving effectiveness of currently used antibiotics, and promoting appropriate prescribing practices. There are no studies evaluating post-operative UTI prophylaxis after MUS with methenamine.

Methenamine is a urinary antiseptic that acts when methenamine is converted to ammonia and formaldehyde, which denatures bacterial proteins and nucleic acids. There is no evidence of bacterial resistance to methenamine. Methenamine has been shown to be non-inferior to antibiotic prophylaxis in the setting of recurrent UTI. Methenamine has most commonly been used as long-term UTI prophylaxis treatment, but there are studies demonstrating benefit from short-term methenamine use for prophylaxis.

The investigator's aim is to evaluate whether methenamine is non-inferior to antibiotic prophylaxis after MUS procedure in preventing post-operative UTI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Methenamine prophylaxis

Methenamine will be prescribed for urinary tract infection prophylaxis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Methenamine Hippurate 1g BD

Intervention Type DRUG

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis chosen per physician preference

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Intervention Type OTHER

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Methenamine Hippurate 1g BD

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Intervention Type DRUG

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Female
2. Age ≥ 18
3. Patients undergoing mid-urethral sling procedure

Exclusion Criteria

1. Medication intolerance or allergy to study medications
2. Renal impairment with GFR \<30
3. Breast feeding
4. Pregnancy
5. Recurrent urinary tract infections
6. Active urinary tract infection
7. Immunosuppressive disease
8. Interstitial cystitis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Atlantic Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shaun Adair

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Atlantic Health

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rena Ow, MD

Role: CONTACT

9739717267

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rena Ow, MD

Role: primary

9739717267

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2248168-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intravesical LGG VS Saline Bladder Wash RCT
NCT05230511 RECRUITING PHASE2
Vitamin C and Hiprex in rUTI
NCT06710899 NOT_YET_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Gentamicin Bladder Instillation Trial
NCT01884467 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Safety and Efficacy of MEE-HU Medicus
NCT05023395 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2