Recovery Times of Half Dose Sugammadex and Neostigmine for Rocuronium-induced Neuromuscular Blockade

NCT ID: NCT06794450

Last Updated: 2025-01-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-05

Study Completion Date

2025-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In operating procedure with general anesthesia muscle relaxant is usually used to increase success rate of the operation and to give better outcome. The use of reversal drugs aims to reduce the risk of post-operative complications due to muscle relaxants. Neostigmine is commonly used as a reversal drug, but its indirect mechanism of action results in a long and unpredictable recovery time. Sugammadex directly bind and inactivate rocuronium, in which resulting in a faster and predictable recovery time. However, the high price limits the use of sugammadex.

This study aims to compare the effect of half dose sugammadex and neostigmine against the moderate neuromuscular blockade of rocuronium.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does half dose sugammadex gives faster recovery time? Researchers will compare sugammadex to neostigmine to see if sugammadex gives faster recovery time.

Participants will:

Be given sugammadex or neostigmine as a reversal drug after the operation done

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neuromuscular blocking agents are frequently utilized to facilitate tracheal intubation, minimize the risk of vocal cord injury, suppress patient movement, and ensure optimal ventilation. The administration of these agents, along with meticulous monitoring of neuromuscular blockade depth, plays a critical role in optimizing the success rates and minimizing complications associated with various surgical procedures, including laparotomy and laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

At the conclusion of surgery, when muscle relaxation is no longer required, neuromuscular blockade should be reversed promptly, safely, and reliably using appropriate reversal agents to minimize the risk of postoperative complications associated with residual neuromuscular blockade. A study reported that 64% of patients undergoing general anesthesia exhibited a neuromuscular recovery of less than 90% and experienced symptoms of re-curarization in the recovery room.

Various reversal agents are available to counteract the effects of neuromuscular blockade, utilizing either direct or indirect mechanisms of action. Cholinesterase inhibitors, such as neostigmine, are among the most commonly used agents. They act indirectly by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, thereby preventing the breakdown of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. However, this mechanism is reliant on the individual's acetylcholine production rate, which can limit neostigmine's effectiveness, contributing to its unpredictability, and increase the risk of re-curarization. In contrast, sugammadex is a specialized reversal agent designed specifically to counteract neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium. Unlike neostigmine, sugammadex employs a direct mechanism by encapsulating rocuronium molecules and forming an inactive complex. This approach enables a faster onset of action and provides a more consistent and predictable recovery profile.

The utilization of sugammadex in Indonesia remains relatively limited, despite the frequent use of rocuronium as a muscle relaxant. This limited use is largely attributed to the significantly higher cost of sugammadex compared to neostigmine. Nonetheless, research has demonstrated that even at doses lower than the recommended levels, sugammadex achieves faster recovery times compared to neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium. This trial looks forward to answering the recovery time of half-dose recommended sugammadex compared with neostigmine with usual dose.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuromuscular Blocking Agents Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade Recovery Time

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sugammadex

The subjects in this study were patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery with general anesthesia and muscle relaxant Rocuronium.

At the end of the surgery, thirty patients will be administered Sugammadex 1 mg/kg as a reversal agent. All patient will receive same anesthetic drug. Patients will be monitored with acceleromyography monitoring tools. Extubation was performed when the Train of Four monitor reached a Train of Four Ratio ≥ 90%.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sugammadex 1 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient in experimental arms will receive i.v. sugammadex 1 mg/kg at the end of operating procedure from the point at which a Train-of-Four Count (TOFC) of 2 is observed

Neostigmine

The subjects in this study were patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery with general anesthesia and muscle relaxant rocuronium.

At the end of the surgery, thirty patients will be administered Neostigmine 60 mcg/kg along with 0.4 mg of atropine sulfate per 1 mg of neostigmine as a reversal agent. All patient will receive same anesthetic drug. Patients will be monitored with acceleromyography monitoring tools. Extubation was performed when the Train of Four monitor reached a Train of Four Ratio ≥ 90%.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neostigmine + Atropine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient in active comparators arms will receive i.v. neostigmine 60 mcg/kg along with 0.4 mg of atropine sulfate per 1 mg of neostigmine at the end of operating procedure from the point at which a Train-of-Four Count (TOFC) of 2 is observed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sugammadex 1 mg/kg

Patient in experimental arms will receive i.v. sugammadex 1 mg/kg at the end of operating procedure from the point at which a Train-of-Four Count (TOFC) of 2 is observed

Intervention Type DRUG

Neostigmine + Atropine

Patient in active comparators arms will receive i.v. neostigmine 60 mcg/kg along with 0.4 mg of atropine sulfate per 1 mg of neostigmine at the end of operating procedure from the point at which a Train-of-Four Count (TOFC) of 2 is observed

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia
* Using muscle relaxant rocuronium
* Aged 18-59 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of 1 or 2.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of drug allergies to the agents used
* Renal dysfunction
* Musculoskeletal disorders
* Central nervous system disorders
* Difficult airways requiring intubation without the use of muscle relaxants.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitas Padjadjaran

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tini T Maskoen, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Faculty of Medicine Universitas Padjadjaran

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hasan Sadikin General Hospital

Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Indonesia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rivan P Rivan Putra Afewa, M.D., M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+6285316832464

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AN-202412.01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Laparotomy Study
NCT02140593 COMPLETED PHASE4