Investigation of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Lower Extremity Nerves in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Peripheral Polyneuropathy

NCT ID: NCT06778005

Last Updated: 2025-09-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate ultrasonographic measurements of the lower extremity nerves in patients diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy and to investigate the relationship with gait, static and dynamic balance performance.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasonographic findings of lower extremity nerves on quality of daily life, physical activity, gait and balance in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia and the body's inability to adequately utilize carbohydrates, fats, and proteins due to a reduction in insulin secretion or insulin action. It requires continuous medical care.

One of the most common complications associated with diabetes is diabetic neuropathy, which affects the autonomic, motor, and sensory nerves of the peripheral nervous system. The most frequent form of diabetic neuropathy is peripheral sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Clinical and electrophysiological findings typically begin in the distal lower extremities.

While nerve conduction studies remain the gold standard for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy, they are time-consuming, require a separate patient visit, and are too costly to recommend for routine screening. Various methods can be employed to assess the morphological changes in nerves associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. With advancing technology in recent years, ultrasonography (US) has emerged as an affordable, reproducible, and more comfortable technique. It can be utilized as an effective method to evaluate structural changes in nerves. Diabetic neuropathy is a significant contributor to the severe morbidity, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life in diabetic patients. Therefore, the early detection of nerve dysfunction through ultrasonography is essential for providing appropriate care to patients with diabetic neuropathy.

The study will be conducted as a cross-sectional and single-center research involving patients with peripheral polyneuropathy secondary to type 2 diabetes and healthy volunteers who present to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic at the Health Sciences University Sultan 2nd Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital.

As part of the study, demographic data collected from participants will include age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, smoking and alcohol usage, marital status, occupation, educational level, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c levels, vitamin B12, ALT, AST, creatinine levels, duration of diabetes, duration of diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy (DPP) complaints, current antidiabetic medications, presence of comorbidities, and neuropathic pain treatment and duration. Patients will be evaluated once, and the assessment will include ultrasonography, the Biodex balance system, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale, numeric pain scale, Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score, diapason vibration sensitivity test, 6-minute walk test, SF-12 quality of life scale, International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and motor and sensory examination.

The sample size for the study was calculated using G-Power version 3.1, based on ultrasonographic measurement data from a similar study conducted by Breiner et al. in 2016. The calculated sample size includes Group 1: 17 healthy participants of similar age and gender, and Group 2: 69 participants diagnosed with peripheral polyneuropathy and type 2 diabetes, amounting to a total of 86 participants. The study is planned to be conducted between December 2024 and May 2025.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Diabetic Polyneuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (Healthy volunteers)

Healthy volunteers without diabetes diagnosis will be included in group 1. (n=17)

Ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurements will be performed using a 7-12 MHz Sonosite M-Turbo device (Fujifilm, USA) with a linear probe by an operator trained in peripheral nervous system ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and echogenicity measurements of the bilateral tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves will be conducted using the ultrasound device. Tibial nerve assessment will be performed 3 cm proximal to the level of the medial malleolus. Common peroneal nerve assessment will be performed by identifying the nerve at the fibular head and tracking it proximally to image it at the level of the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve assessment will be conducted 10 cm proximal to the upper level of the lateral malleolus. All nerve measurements will be conducted twice in the transverse plane, and the obtained images will be recorded and uploaded into the ImageJ programming system.

Biodex Balance System

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Biodex is a computer-assisted device with a movement system capable of providing surface inclinations ranging from 360 degrees to 20 degrees. It allows movement in anterior/posterior and mediolateral planes. The device has 12 levels of difficulty, where level 12 represents the highest stability and level 1 represents the lowest stability. It can be used for balance training with different therapy protocols and includes standardized programming systems for evaluating both static and dynamic balance. It provides numerical data for key parameters such as balance, fall risk, and proprioception. In this study, patients will be assessed using the fall risk test and postural stability evaluation test protocols on the Biodex balance system. All participants will be trained and familiarized with the system before the test.

Postural Stability Test: The difficulty level will be set to 8. Fall Risk Test: The difficulty level will progressively decrease from 6 to 2.

Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale score will be used to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The DN4 scale consists of 10 questions, 7 of which inquire about symptoms, and 3 that assess the patient's clinical examination for neuropathy. The symptoms assessed include a burning sensation, pain from cold, electric shock sensations, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The sensory exams assess touch hypoesthesia, pin-prick hypoesthesia, and brush allodynia. Each "yes" response to a question receives 1 point. To calculate the total score, points obtained from the symptom inquiry and clinical examination are added together. The maximum total score is 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain

Numeric Rating Scale

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The numeric pain scale will be used to assess the intensity of neuropathic pain. The patient is asked to provide a value between 0 and 10 to indicate the intensity of their pain. Higher scores are associated with an increase in pain severity.

Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) will be used to assess the severity of Diabetic Peripheral Polyneuropathy (DPPN). The Turkish version of the Toronto clinical scoring system is a reliable and valid tool for assessing polyneuropathy in Turkish-speaking patients. The TCNS is preferred in clinical studies because of its ease of use, patient acceptability, ability to classify the severity of DPPN, and its representation of clinical changes related to the progression of DPPN. The scale consists of three sections: symptom scores, sensory test scores, and reflex scores.The first section includes scoring symptoms in the upper and lower extremities .The second section includes scoring the bilateral Achilles and patellar reflexes. The third section involves scoring the sensation in the toe. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (no neuropathy) to a maximum of 19 points.

Six-Minute Walk Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional capacity. The test area should be a corridor with a minimum length of 30 meters, flat, and firm surface. The corridor should be marked every 3 meters. Turnaround points are indicated with objects such as orange traffic cones. A line is drawn for the start and end of the test. Recommended materials for the test include a stopwatch, a device to count laps, cones to mark turning points, a chair placed within easy reach, oxygen support (to be given if necessary), and a blood pressure cuff. The patient should wear comfortable clothing and shoes suitable for walking. They can use any walking aids such as crutches or a walker. Medications or treatments should be taken as usual. The patient should have had a light meal before the test and should not have engaged in heavy physical activity within the 2 hours preceding the test. There should be no warm-up period before the test.

SF-12 Quality of Life Scale

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The SF-12 Quality of Life Scale will be calculated using an online calculator tool, providing two types of scores: physical and mental scores.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ)

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

The IPAQ scale was developed to address the general health problem of insufficient physical activity, which necessitates large population studies and allows for cross-country comparisons. Validity studies conducted across multiple countries have proven that this questionnaire is valid and reliable. This survey assesses individuals based on the types of physical activities they perform in their daily lives. The questions asked pertain to the time spent physically active over the past 7 days.

Tuning Fork Vibration Sense

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Vibration sense will be assessed using a traditional 128 Hz tuning fork. When the stem of a 128 Hz tuning fork is placed on the dorsal aspect of the interphalangeal joint of the hallux, a healthy person can feel the vibration as long as it continues (15-20 seconds). In conditions leading to peripheral nerve damage (such as polyneuropathy), vibration sense is impaired. The examiner holds the proximal end of the tuning fork with one hand, while the distal end is struck strongly against the palm of the examiner's other hand. The examiner should try to strike the tuning fork with consistent force for each assessment. After striking, the tuning fork is placed just proximal to the nail bed, on the dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx of the hallux.Before applying the tuning fork, the participant is instructed to verbally respond with "yes" if they can initially feel the vibration, and they should also indicate "now" when they stop feeling the vibration.

Timed Up and Go Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is designed to measure dynamic balance based on the time it takes for patients to stand up and walk, providing quantitative results. The patient starts the test by sitting on a standardized chair (46 cm high). During the test, the patient is instructed to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters away, turn around, and then return to sit back down on the chair. The duration of this process is measured. Lower values indicate better stability. A cutoff value of 13.5 seconds has been used to identify high fall risk in the TUG test.

Physical Examination

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Manual Muscle Test: Muscle strength is evaluated using the MRC (Medical Research Council) muscle strength scale.

Reflexes:Patellar reflex: The reflex hammer is struck on the patella, and extension of the leg is observed. Achilles reflex: With one hand, the patient's foot is lightly dorsiflexed, and the Achilles tendon is struck; plantar flexion is observed in the ankle.

Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy)

Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy will be included in group 2. (n=69)

Ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measurements will be performed using a 7-12 MHz Sonosite M-Turbo device (Fujifilm, USA) with a linear probe by an operator trained in peripheral nervous system ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and echogenicity measurements of the bilateral tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves will be conducted using the ultrasound device. Tibial nerve assessment will be performed 3 cm proximal to the level of the medial malleolus. Common peroneal nerve assessment will be performed by identifying the nerve at the fibular head and tracking it proximally to image it at the level of the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve assessment will be conducted 10 cm proximal to the upper level of the lateral malleolus. All nerve measurements will be conducted twice in the transverse plane, and the obtained images will be recorded and uploaded into the ImageJ programming system.

Biodex Balance System

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Biodex is a computer-assisted device with a movement system capable of providing surface inclinations ranging from 360 degrees to 20 degrees. It allows movement in anterior/posterior and mediolateral planes. The device has 12 levels of difficulty, where level 12 represents the highest stability and level 1 represents the lowest stability. It can be used for balance training with different therapy protocols and includes standardized programming systems for evaluating both static and dynamic balance. It provides numerical data for key parameters such as balance, fall risk, and proprioception. In this study, patients will be assessed using the fall risk test and postural stability evaluation test protocols on the Biodex balance system. All participants will be trained and familiarized with the system before the test.

Postural Stability Test: The difficulty level will be set to 8. Fall Risk Test: The difficulty level will progressively decrease from 6 to 2.

Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale score will be used to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The DN4 scale consists of 10 questions, 7 of which inquire about symptoms, and 3 that assess the patient's clinical examination for neuropathy. The symptoms assessed include a burning sensation, pain from cold, electric shock sensations, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The sensory exams assess touch hypoesthesia, pin-prick hypoesthesia, and brush allodynia. Each "yes" response to a question receives 1 point. To calculate the total score, points obtained from the symptom inquiry and clinical examination are added together. The maximum total score is 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain

Numeric Rating Scale

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The numeric pain scale will be used to assess the intensity of neuropathic pain. The patient is asked to provide a value between 0 and 10 to indicate the intensity of their pain. Higher scores are associated with an increase in pain severity.

Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) will be used to assess the severity of Diabetic Peripheral Polyneuropathy (DPPN). The Turkish version of the Toronto clinical scoring system is a reliable and valid tool for assessing polyneuropathy in Turkish-speaking patients. The TCNS is preferred in clinical studies because of its ease of use, patient acceptability, ability to classify the severity of DPPN, and its representation of clinical changes related to the progression of DPPN. The scale consists of three sections: symptom scores, sensory test scores, and reflex scores.The first section includes scoring symptoms in the upper and lower extremities .The second section includes scoring the bilateral Achilles and patellar reflexes. The third section involves scoring the sensation in the toe. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (no neuropathy) to a maximum of 19 points.

Six-Minute Walk Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional capacity. The test area should be a corridor with a minimum length of 30 meters, flat, and firm surface. The corridor should be marked every 3 meters. Turnaround points are indicated with objects such as orange traffic cones. A line is drawn for the start and end of the test. Recommended materials for the test include a stopwatch, a device to count laps, cones to mark turning points, a chair placed within easy reach, oxygen support (to be given if necessary), and a blood pressure cuff. The patient should wear comfortable clothing and shoes suitable for walking. They can use any walking aids such as crutches or a walker. Medications or treatments should be taken as usual. The patient should have had a light meal before the test and should not have engaged in heavy physical activity within the 2 hours preceding the test. There should be no warm-up period before the test.

SF-12 Quality of Life Scale

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The SF-12 Quality of Life Scale will be calculated using an online calculator tool, providing two types of scores: physical and mental scores.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ)

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

The IPAQ scale was developed to address the general health problem of insufficient physical activity, which necessitates large population studies and allows for cross-country comparisons. Validity studies conducted across multiple countries have proven that this questionnaire is valid and reliable. This survey assesses individuals based on the types of physical activities they perform in their daily lives. The questions asked pertain to the time spent physically active over the past 7 days.

Tuning Fork Vibration Sense

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Vibration sense will be assessed using a traditional 128 Hz tuning fork. When the stem of a 128 Hz tuning fork is placed on the dorsal aspect of the interphalangeal joint of the hallux, a healthy person can feel the vibration as long as it continues (15-20 seconds). In conditions leading to peripheral nerve damage (such as polyneuropathy), vibration sense is impaired. The examiner holds the proximal end of the tuning fork with one hand, while the distal end is struck strongly against the palm of the examiner's other hand. The examiner should try to strike the tuning fork with consistent force for each assessment. After striking, the tuning fork is placed just proximal to the nail bed, on the dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx of the hallux.Before applying the tuning fork, the participant is instructed to verbally respond with "yes" if they can initially feel the vibration, and they should also indicate "now" when they stop feeling the vibration.

Timed Up and Go Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is designed to measure dynamic balance based on the time it takes for patients to stand up and walk, providing quantitative results. The patient starts the test by sitting on a standardized chair (46 cm high). During the test, the patient is instructed to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters away, turn around, and then return to sit back down on the chair. The duration of this process is measured. Lower values indicate better stability. A cutoff value of 13.5 seconds has been used to identify high fall risk in the TUG test.

Physical Examination

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Manual Muscle Test: Muscle strength is evaluated using the MRC (Medical Research Council) muscle strength scale.

Reflexes:Patellar reflex: The reflex hammer is struck on the patella, and extension of the leg is observed. Achilles reflex: With one hand, the patient's foot is lightly dorsiflexed, and the Achilles tendon is struck; plantar flexion is observed in the ankle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasonography

Measurements will be performed using a 7-12 MHz Sonosite M-Turbo device (Fujifilm, USA) with a linear probe by an operator trained in peripheral nervous system ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and echogenicity measurements of the bilateral tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves will be conducted using the ultrasound device. Tibial nerve assessment will be performed 3 cm proximal to the level of the medial malleolus. Common peroneal nerve assessment will be performed by identifying the nerve at the fibular head and tracking it proximally to image it at the level of the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve assessment will be conducted 10 cm proximal to the upper level of the lateral malleolus. All nerve measurements will be conducted twice in the transverse plane, and the obtained images will be recorded and uploaded into the ImageJ programming system.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Biodex Balance System

The Biodex is a computer-assisted device with a movement system capable of providing surface inclinations ranging from 360 degrees to 20 degrees. It allows movement in anterior/posterior and mediolateral planes. The device has 12 levels of difficulty, where level 12 represents the highest stability and level 1 represents the lowest stability. It can be used for balance training with different therapy protocols and includes standardized programming systems for evaluating both static and dynamic balance. It provides numerical data for key parameters such as balance, fall risk, and proprioception. In this study, patients will be assessed using the fall risk test and postural stability evaluation test protocols on the Biodex balance system. All participants will be trained and familiarized with the system before the test.

Postural Stability Test: The difficulty level will be set to 8. Fall Risk Test: The difficulty level will progressively decrease from 6 to 2.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale

The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale score will be used to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The DN4 scale consists of 10 questions, 7 of which inquire about symptoms, and 3 that assess the patient's clinical examination for neuropathy. The symptoms assessed include a burning sensation, pain from cold, electric shock sensations, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The sensory exams assess touch hypoesthesia, pin-prick hypoesthesia, and brush allodynia. Each "yes" response to a question receives 1 point. To calculate the total score, points obtained from the symptom inquiry and clinical examination are added together. The maximum total score is 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Numeric Rating Scale

The numeric pain scale will be used to assess the intensity of neuropathic pain. The patient is asked to provide a value between 0 and 10 to indicate the intensity of their pain. Higher scores are associated with an increase in pain severity.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score

The Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) will be used to assess the severity of Diabetic Peripheral Polyneuropathy (DPPN). The Turkish version of the Toronto clinical scoring system is a reliable and valid tool for assessing polyneuropathy in Turkish-speaking patients. The TCNS is preferred in clinical studies because of its ease of use, patient acceptability, ability to classify the severity of DPPN, and its representation of clinical changes related to the progression of DPPN. The scale consists of three sections: symptom scores, sensory test scores, and reflex scores.The first section includes scoring symptoms in the upper and lower extremities .The second section includes scoring the bilateral Achilles and patellar reflexes. The third section involves scoring the sensation in the toe. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (no neuropathy) to a maximum of 19 points.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Six-Minute Walk Test

Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional capacity. The test area should be a corridor with a minimum length of 30 meters, flat, and firm surface. The corridor should be marked every 3 meters. Turnaround points are indicated with objects such as orange traffic cones. A line is drawn for the start and end of the test. Recommended materials for the test include a stopwatch, a device to count laps, cones to mark turning points, a chair placed within easy reach, oxygen support (to be given if necessary), and a blood pressure cuff. The patient should wear comfortable clothing and shoes suitable for walking. They can use any walking aids such as crutches or a walker. Medications or treatments should be taken as usual. The patient should have had a light meal before the test and should not have engaged in heavy physical activity within the 2 hours preceding the test. There should be no warm-up period before the test.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

SF-12 Quality of Life Scale

The SF-12 Quality of Life Scale will be calculated using an online calculator tool, providing two types of scores: physical and mental scores.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ)

The IPAQ scale was developed to address the general health problem of insufficient physical activity, which necessitates large population studies and allows for cross-country comparisons. Validity studies conducted across multiple countries have proven that this questionnaire is valid and reliable. This survey assesses individuals based on the types of physical activities they perform in their daily lives. The questions asked pertain to the time spent physically active over the past 7 days.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Tuning Fork Vibration Sense

Vibration sense will be assessed using a traditional 128 Hz tuning fork. When the stem of a 128 Hz tuning fork is placed on the dorsal aspect of the interphalangeal joint of the hallux, a healthy person can feel the vibration as long as it continues (15-20 seconds). In conditions leading to peripheral nerve damage (such as polyneuropathy), vibration sense is impaired. The examiner holds the proximal end of the tuning fork with one hand, while the distal end is struck strongly against the palm of the examiner's other hand. The examiner should try to strike the tuning fork with consistent force for each assessment. After striking, the tuning fork is placed just proximal to the nail bed, on the dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx of the hallux.Before applying the tuning fork, the participant is instructed to verbally respond with "yes" if they can initially feel the vibration, and they should also indicate "now" when they stop feeling the vibration.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Timed Up and Go Test

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is designed to measure dynamic balance based on the time it takes for patients to stand up and walk, providing quantitative results. The patient starts the test by sitting on a standardized chair (46 cm high). During the test, the patient is instructed to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters away, turn around, and then return to sit back down on the chair. The duration of this process is measured. Lower values indicate better stability. A cutoff value of 13.5 seconds has been used to identify high fall risk in the TUG test.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Physical Examination

Manual Muscle Test: Muscle strength is evaluated using the MRC (Medical Research Council) muscle strength scale.

Reflexes:Patellar reflex: The reflex hammer is struck on the patella, and extension of the leg is observed. Achilles reflex: With one hand, the patient's foot is lightly dorsiflexed, and the Achilles tendon is struck; plantar flexion is observed in the ankle.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being between the ages of 18-65
* Being literate
* Signed a voluntary consent form agreeing to participate in the study


* Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes based on at least one of the following diagnostic criteria: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl, 2-hour plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl in an oral glucose tolerance test, HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, or diabetes symptoms (excessive thirst, eating, urination, and weight loss) + random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl. (14)
* Diagnosed with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy through EMG evaluation in addition to Type 2 Diabetes.
* Being between the ages of 18-65
* Being literate
* Signed a voluntary consent form agreeing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals under 18 years old and over 65 years old
* Diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes
* Use of medications that can cause polyneuropathy
* Other causes of neuropathic pain (lumbar radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, -hereditary, inflammatory, entrapment neuropathies)
* Undergoing lower extremity surgery (spine/hip/knee/foot) in the last 6 months
* Having peripheral artery disease
* B12 vitamin deficiency
* Active foot ulcer
* History of lower extremity amputation
* Severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency (stage 3-4)
* History of myocardial infarction within the last 1 month
* History of unstable angina
* Active systemic inflammatory diseases and active malignancy
* Presence of vestibular disorders
* Presence of cognitive impairment
* Osteoarthritis in the lower extremity
* Pregnancy
* Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emre Ata, Ass. Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

Feyza Nur Yücel, Specialist

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

Semiha Özgüç, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Üsküdar, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Üsküdar, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Semiha Özgüç

Role: CONTACT

5426311029

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

semiha özgüç acar, doctor

Role: primary

5426311029

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bril V, Tomioka S, Buchanan RA, Perkins BA; mTCNS Study Group. Reliability and validity of the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Diabet Med. 2009 Mar;26(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02667.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19317818 (View on PubMed)

Arnold BL, Schmitz RJ. Examination of balance measures produced by the biodex stability system. J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):323-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16558529 (View on PubMed)

Arumugam T, Razali SN, Vethakkan SR, Rozalli FI, Shahrizaila N. Relationship between ultrasonographic nerve morphology and severity of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Eur J Neurol. 2016 Feb;23(2):354-60. doi: 10.1111/ene.12836. Epub 2015 Oct 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26498575 (View on PubMed)

Fisse AL, Katsanos AH, Gold R, Krogias C, Pitarokoili K. Cross-sectional area reference values for peripheral nerve ultrasound in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis-Part II: Lower extremity nerves. Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jul;28(7):2313-2318. doi: 10.1111/ene.14850. Epub 2021 May 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33794049 (View on PubMed)

Sundaram TK. Myo-inositol catabolism in Salmonella typhimiurium: enzyme repression dependent on growth history of organism. J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Nov;73(2):209-19. doi: 10.1099/00221287-73-2-209. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 4567227 (View on PubMed)

Breiner A, Qrimli M, Ebadi H, Alabdali M, Lovblom LE, Abraham A, Albulahi H, Perkins BA, Bril V. Peripheral nerve high-resolution ultrasound in diabetes. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Feb;55(2):171-178. doi: 10.1002/mus.25223. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27312883 (View on PubMed)

Harreiter J, Roden M. [Diabetes mellitus: definition, classification, diagnosis, screening and prevention (Update 2023)]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Jan;135(Suppl 1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02122-y. Epub 2023 Apr 20. German.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37101021 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14/2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.