Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2024-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Repeatability of Blood Glucose Responses to Resistance Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes
NCT05168488
The Effect of Hyperglycaemia on Local Energy Stores in the Working Muscle in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00325559
Reproducibility of Glucose Fluctuations by Standardized Exercise for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes - a Method Study Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
NCT02942069
The Effect of Rapid and Slow Glucose Fall on the Subsequent Glucose Production in People With Type 1 Diabetes
NCT04098549
Effects of Low Intensity Aerobic Exercise on the Microvascular Endothelial Function of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
NCT02441504
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Physical activity (PA) is one of the most effective non-pharmacological methods to prevent diabetes mellitus and treat cardiometabolic conditions associated with this condition. A multicenter study highlighted that regular PA in patients with T1D improves glycemic control. PA influences glucose levels, offering a means to prevent or avoid the worsening of diabetic complications. Regular PA leads to skeletal muscle adaptations that increase muscle sensitivity to glucose uptake, reducing the need for insulin. Despite the benefits of physical activity on cardiometabolic components and quality of life for patients with T1D, over 50% of these patients do not meet the recommended levels of PA.
Among the most popular forms of PA are aerobic and resistance training (RT). Aerobic training is inversely related to the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in T1D, but this latter type of training, especially of medium-low intensity (for long periods), can lead to hypoglycemia, especially if insulin doses and carbohydrate intake are not adjusted to training needs. In contrast, intense RT, generally causes an increase in blood sugar levels due to the release of catecholamines. On the other hand, the benefits of RT in the management and control of T1D are well known. RT of either moderate or high intensity, can offer multiple benefits to people with T1D which include increased muscle strength, improved lipid profile, decreased insulin dosage, and reduced blood glucose levels. A systematic review and meta-analysis found that RT is associated with a significant reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), an indicator of long-term glycemic control, compared to control groups. RT can also improve insulin sensitivity in individuals with T1D and reduce the risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia following aerobic exercise.
Another type of training that has traditionally been used to improve range of movement (ROM) is stretching. Stretching, compared to other forms of exercise, can be performed in a more static setting, and it may be adopted as a suitable alternative for both rehabilitative environments and specific conditions that prevent autonomous exercise. Recent evidence has shifted from the traditional focus of stretching on improving flexibility to broader systemic effects. In this regard, it has been observed that stretching-based interventions can significantly reduce blood glucose levels and HbA1c, regardless of the type of stretching. The review highlighted that the effects were more evident in patients with T2D. Despite the insights provided by this latter review article, there are no known effects of stretching interventions on glucose management and insulin sensitivity in patients with T1D. Since hypoglycemia is the primary barrier to exercise in this population, event that does not occur in T2D patients, it is crucial to evaluate exercise-specific responses in individuals with T1D. Therefore, our study aims to determine if a 6-week whole body static stretching (SS) intervention can be used as an exercise intervention to manage glycemia and improve insulin sensitivity in a sample of active people with T1D.
Data concerning blood glucose levels (mg/dl), daily CHO consumption and UI/die will be extracted from the continuous glucose monitor of each participant. CGM systems allow people with T1D to monitor in real-time changes in blood glucose. All participants have to be experienced in carbohydrate counting. However, to increase consistency a mobile phone app will be recommended (Yazio for Ios and Android) that extracted the grams of CHO by providing the amount and type of food ingested. UI/die will also be calculated as a sum of basal and bolus insulin units injected per day. The insulin sensitivity index (IS) will then be calculated as the CHO-to-UI/die ratio, which was calculated as the total grams of CHO consumed during one day to the total UI/die.
Participants will be assigned to two groups: a CC and an experimental group. The CC will maintaine their usual exercise routine, while the experimental group will include to their usual exercise routine, during non-training days, a 6-week SS exercise protocol. The protocol will consist in 2 sessions per week, each comprising 8 exercises targeting all major muscle groups: 1) Hamstrings, 2) Knee Extensors, 3) Dorsal muscles, 4) Pectoralis muscles, 5) Elbow Flexors (biceps), 6) Elbow Extensors (triceps), 7) Adductors, and one day 8a) Spine Extensors while the second 8b) Spine Flexors. Each exercise 4 sets of 30 seconds of SS and 30 seconds of rest. Before each session, blood glucose levels will be monitored to ensure stability. In cases participants will show signs of impending hypoglycemia, sessions will be interrupted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CC
The participants continue with their own activities for the study period
No interventions assigned to this group
SS
The participants undergo a static stretching protocol twice a week for six weeks. The protocol consists in 2 sessions per week, each comprising 8 exercises targeting all major muscle groups: 1) Hamstrings, 2) Knee Extensors, 3) Dorsal muscles, 4) Pectoralis muscles, 5) Elbow Flexors (biceps), 6) Elbow Extensors (triceps), 7) Adductors, and one day 8a) Spine Extensors while the second 8b) Spine Flexors. Each exercise involved 4 sets of 30 seconds of SS and 30 seconds of rest.
Static Stretching
The protocol consisted in 2 sessions per week, each comprising 8 exercises of static stretching targeting all major muscle groups: 1) Hamstrings, 2) Knee Extensors, 3) Dorsal muscles, 4) Pectoralis muscles, 5) Elbow Flexors (biceps), 6) Elbow Extensors (triceps), 7) Adductors, and one day 8a) Spine Extensors while the second 8b) Spine Flexors. Each exercise involved 4 sets of 30 seconds of SS and 30 seconds of rest.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Static Stretching
The protocol consisted in 2 sessions per week, each comprising 8 exercises of static stretching targeting all major muscle groups: 1) Hamstrings, 2) Knee Extensors, 3) Dorsal muscles, 4) Pectoralis muscles, 5) Elbow Flexors (biceps), 6) Elbow Extensors (triceps), 7) Adductors, and one day 8a) Spine Extensors while the second 8b) Spine Flexors. Each exercise involved 4 sets of 30 seconds of SS and 30 seconds of rest.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. exercise regularly 2 to 3 times per week
3. perform exercise activities other than stretching
4. absence of other diabetes-related diseases or comorbidities that prevent them from safely exercising
5. HbA1c level ≤ 7%
6. BMI ≤ 29.9 kg/m²
7. use a CGM reader to monitor glucose levels and daily CHO intake (g) and insulin administration (IU/die).
Exclusion Criteria
2. exercise less or more than 2 to 3 times per week
3. perform stretching exercises during the study period
4. presence of other diabetes-related diseases or comorbidities that prevent them from safely exercising
5. HbA1c level greater than 7%
6. BMI greater than 29.9 kg/m²
7. not using a CGM reader to monitor glucose levels and daily CHO intake (g) and insulin administration (IU/die).
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Palermo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ewan Thomas
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Palermo
Palermo, IT, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
260-2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.