Intrathecal Morphine Injection Versus Continuous Wound Infiltration After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

NCT ID: NCT06761989

Last Updated: 2025-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-15

Study Completion Date

2027-01-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective randomized open-label noninferiority trial that compares intrathecal morphine injection and continuous wound infiltration after open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Open pancreaticoduodenectomy causes severe postoperative pain due to the relatively large incision and tissue damage compared to other abdominal surgeries. Current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines recommend continuous wound infiltration for pancreaticoduodenectomy as an effective analgesic modality along with thoracic epidural analgesia. However, continuous wound infiltration is effective for somatic pain in the abdominal wall but not for visceral pain from the incision of internal organs. It also requires the placement of a catheter for several days after surgery, which can be inconvenient for patients.

Intrathecal morphine injection has been recommended as an effective analgesic method for abdominal surgery because they provide potent, long-lasting analgesia with a single injection and can provide equivalent analgesia with a much smaller dose compared to intravenous or oral morphine. Several previous studies have reported on the analgesic efficacy of a single intrathecal morphine injection including pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, no studies have compared a single intrathecal morphine injection with continuous wound infiltration for pancreaticoduodenectomy. To date, studies comparing the two methods of analgesia have only been reported in cesarean section and donor hepatectomy, and these studies either found no significant difference between the two methods of analgesia or reported that intrathecal morphine injection provided better analgesia in early postoperative period.

Therefore, the investigators will examine the effect of single intrathecal morphine injection for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy to improve postoperative pain management and to explore its potential as one of the effective analgesic methods in ERAS protocol. To this end, the investigators will test non-inferiority between intrathecal morphine injection and continuous wound infiltration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Management Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Stratify patients who receive preoperative chemotherapy and those who do not in a 1:3 ratio, so that 26 and 78 patients are assigned to each stratum out of a total of 104 patients. Then, within each stratum, block randomization is performed, with blocks of size 4 containing two intrathecal morphine and two wound infiltration groups, and blocks of size 6 containing three intrathecal morphine and three wound infiltration groups.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intrathecal morphine injection

A single dose of intrathecal morphine is administered prior to induction of general anesthesia. Other postoperative pain management follows the institution's protocol including intravenous patient controlled analgesia.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intrathecal morphine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

A single dose of intrathecal morphine is administered prior to induction of general anesthesia. The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position on the bed and a 25 guage quincke spinal needle is inserted intrathecally at the L4/5 median or paramedian approach to administer 0.2 mg of morphine.

Continuous wound infiltration

A catheter is inserted at preperitoneal space at the end of surgery and ropivacaine is continuously infused until postoperative day 3. Other postoperative pain management follows the institution's protocol including intravenous patient controlled analgesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuous wound infiltration

Intervention Type DEVICE

Prior to closure of the abdominal wall, a catheter is placed in the preperitoneal space lateral to the surgical incision through the tunneler. The catheter is connected to a prepared infusion pump (275 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, 4 ml/hr/catheter), and the remaining catheter protruding from the abdomen is secured with a catheterization dressing. The preperitoneal catheter is removed in the afternoon of postoperative day 3.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intrathecal morphine injection

A single dose of intrathecal morphine is administered prior to induction of general anesthesia. The patient is placed in the lateral decubitus position on the bed and a 25 guage quincke spinal needle is inserted intrathecally at the L4/5 median or paramedian approach to administer 0.2 mg of morphine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Continuous wound infiltration

Prior to closure of the abdominal wall, a catheter is placed in the preperitoneal space lateral to the surgical incision through the tunneler. The catheter is connected to a prepared infusion pump (275 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, 4 ml/hr/catheter), and the remaining catheter protruding from the abdomen is secured with a catheterization dressing. The preperitoneal catheter is removed in the afternoon of postoperative day 3.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults 19 years of age or older
* Scheduled for elective open pancreaticoduodenectomy or pylorus preseriving pancreaticoduodenectomy
* Disease of periampullary lesions
* Perfromance status assessed with ECOG score is 0 or 1 at the time of enrollment
* Able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study, understand the procedures of this study, and complete patient-reported questionnaires
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III

Exclusion Criteria

* Hypersensitivity to medications used for pain control (fentanyl, ropivacaine, morphine, acetaminophen, NSAIDs)
* Cognitive impairment that affects using patient-controlled analgesia device or answering patient-reported questionnaires
* Infection or anatomical abnormalities of the abdominal wall and skin that preclude catheterization for continuous wound infiltration
* Contraindicated for intrathecal injection due to any coagulation disorder or continued use of anticoagulants
* Have a major medical or psychiatric illness that would affect response to treatment
* History of chronic pain, or chronic use of analgesics or psychiatric medications
* Have severe liver or kidney disease
* Anyone who are not appropriate for the study in the opinion of the investigators
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hojin Lee, MD, PhD

Associated Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ho-jin Lee, M.D., PhD.

Role: CONTACT

+82-2-2072-0039

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hojin Lee, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-2-2072-2467

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-2411-020-1585

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Medicine for Wound Care Procedures
NCT00701909 COMPLETED PHASE3