Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Blood of TB Patients and Their Contacts in Uganda
NCT ID: NCT06751706
Last Updated: 2025-06-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-09-30
2026-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There is currently no gold standard test for LTBI. Existing diagnostic - the tuberculin skin test (TST) and Interferon-γ Release Assays (IGRA) - diagnose Mtb infection by detecting memory T cell responses to Mtb antigens. Their value is limited by very low positive predictive value (PPV) for progression to active TB (1.5% for TST, 2.7% for IGRA), inability to detect antimicrobial resistance in latently infected individuals and lack of response to administration of preventive therapy. Development of a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for LTBI could overcome these limitations by allowing targeting of preventive therapy at latently infected individuals with the highest risk of progression to active TB, with antimicrobial selection guided by genetic antimicrobial resistance profiling and capacity for test of cure on treatment completion.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patients With Tuberculosis, Mycobacteriosis or Latent Tuberculosis
NCT06764576
Immunocompetent Versus Immunocompromised Tuberculosis (TB) Patients
NCT06709157
Evaluation of a Novel Microbiological Diagnostic Test for Latent Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection
NCT06728930
Real-time Tuberculosis Medication Adherence Intervention in Rural Southwestern Uganda
NCT03800888
Impact of Systematic Early Tuberculosis Detection Using Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in Children With Severe Pneumonia in High Tuberculosis Burden Countries (TB-Speed Pneumonia)
NCT03831906
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These exciting results demonstrate the potential for development of a NAAT for detection and genomic drug-resistance testing of LTBI in peripheral blood. However, questions remain regarding whether detection of Mtb DNA in the blood of symptomatic individuals associates with the ability to visualize or culture bacilli in blood, which has been done in patients with active TB. Moreover, our existing method for detection of Mtb DNA in CD34+ PBMC using dPCR is not currently suitable for field use, as samples require lengthy laboratory processing. The GeneXpert platform, which can give results in less than 2 hours, has previously been used to detect Mtb DNA in whole blood of HIV-infected patients with active TB. Sensitivity of the Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay (Xpert Ultra, which has a limit of detection \[LOD\] of 15.6 colony-forming units \[CFU\]/ml versus 112.6 CFU/ml for the original Xpert® MTB/RIF \[assay) is sufficient to detect Mtb DNA in the range demonstrated in blood of latently infected TB contacts in Ethiopia and Uganda (20 to 1000 copies of rpoB in the majority of Mtb DNA-positive individuals). However, detection of Mtb in blood of latently infected individuals has not previously been attempted using this platform. Finally, the investigators wish to expand knowledge by comparing detection of Mtb DNA in recent vs. historical TB contacts, and by including patients with active TB as a positive control group.
The investigators therefore propose to conduct a study to compare the sensitivity of different methodologies for detection of Mtb and genomic drug resistance in peripheral blood of TB patients and recently vs. remotely exposed asymptomatic TB contacts in Kampala, Uganda.
Study objectives Primary objective
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) can be detected in the blood of recent TB contacts, recruited in Kampala, Uganda, using any of the following methods:
* Digital PCR
* GeneXpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Cepheid)
* Fluorescence microscopy
* Blood culture
* Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing
Secondary objectives
Secondary objectives of this study are:
1. To determine whether Mtb persists in the blood of remotely exposed (historical) TB contacts, recruited in the same setting, and using the same methods.
2. To determine whether Mtb can be detected in the blood of patients with newly-diagnosed active TB, recruited in the same setting, and using the same methods.
3. To establish whether detection of Mtb in blood using the methods above associates with any of the following biomarkers of host immune response:
* QFT-Plus
* Blood RNA signatures for incipient tuberculosis
* Antibody profiles
4. To determine whether Mtb strains isolated from the sputum/blood of index cases with pulmonary TB are genetically identical to those detected in the blood of their recent contacts.
Primary endpoint Proportion of TB patients and their contacts in whom Mtb DNA can be detected in peripheral blood using digital PCR.
Secondary endpoints
1. Proportion of TB patients and their contacts in whom Mtb DNA can be detected in peripheral blood using the following methods:
* GeneXpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Cepheid)
* Fluorescence microscopy
* Blood culture
* Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing
2. Proportion of TB patients and their contacts with positive results for either of the following assays:
* QFT-Plus
* Blood RNA signatures for incipient tuberculosis
* Antibody profiles
3. Genetic sequences of Mtb strains isolated from the sputum/blood of index cases with pulmonary TB and blood of these participants and their asymptomatic household contacts.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A: TB patients
New diagnosis of smear-positive or Xpert-confirmed pulmonary TB
No interventions assigned to this group
Group B: Recent TB contacts
Household contact with an index case of smear-positive pulmonary TB recruited to Group A.
No interventions assigned to this group
Group C: Historical TB contacts
Participant in previous TB household contact study
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years
* New diagnosis of smear-positive or Xpert-confirmed pulmonary TB
* At least one asymptomatic adult household contact likely to fulfil TB contact eligibility criteria below
* Able and willing to give written informed consent to participate
* Age ≥18 years
* Household contact with an index case of smear-positive pulmonary TB in Group A above.
* Able and willing to give written informed consent to participate
* Age ≥18 years
* Participant in previous TB household contact study
Exclusion Criteria
* Confirmed or suspected pregnancy (female participants)
* Existing medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator may adversely affect the participant's safety or ability to participate in the study.
Recent TB contacts (Group B):
* Clinical or radiological features of active TB
* Current or previous anti-TB treatment
* Confirmed or suspected pregnancy (female participants)
* Existing medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator may adversely affect the participant's safety or ability to participate in the study.
Historical TB contacts (Group C):
* Clinical or radiological features of active TB
* Current or previous anti-TB treatment
* Confirmed or suspected pregnancy (female participants)
* Existing medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator may adversely affect the participant's safety or ability to participate in the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Makerere University
OTHER
Queen Mary University of London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adrian Martineau, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queen Mary University London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Infectious diseases institute, Makarere University
Kampala, , Uganda
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IDI-REC-2023-80
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.