Trial Readiness and Endpoint Assessment in Pediatric Myotonic Dystrophy Extension
NCT ID: NCT06747884
Last Updated: 2025-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-06-06
2030-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial Readiness and Endpoint Assessment in Congenital and Childhood Myotonic Dystrophy
NCT06276244
Estab Biomarkers and Clinical Endpoints in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (END-DM1)
NCT03981575
Trial Readiness and Endpoint Assessment in Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy
NCT03059264
Six Month Study of Gentamicin in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy With Stop Codons
NCT00451074
DMCRN-02-001: Assessing Pediatric Endpoints in DM1
NCT05224778
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, there is an ongoing therapeutic trial in adults with DM1 using an antisense oligonucleotide to target the destruction of the CTG repeat. The ability to conduct this trial in children is directly limited by the lack of available data regarding appropriate clinical endpoints and biomarkers. Although the underlying mechanism is the same in adult DM1 and CDM, there are specific challenges to directly transferring outcome measures into the CDM population. First, our cross-sectional data demonstrates age-related improvement in several functional outcome measures, such as the 6-minute walk. Second, in the adult DM1 clinical trial, RNA splicing changes in the tibialis anterior muscle are a primary endpoint because they correlate with functional measures. However, our pilot data with described splicing changes does not clearly correlate with the adult clinical phenotype.
This study is designed to establish valid and reliable clinical outcome assessments for children with congenital and childhood myotonic dystrophy, and to develop biomarkers for the condition.
This study will enroll up to 200 children with CDM and ChDM at participating sites. No treatment will be administered as part of this study. Patients will receive standard of care as determined by their treating physician. Study visits will occur at Baseline, Month 12, and Month 24.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Congenital myotonic dystrophy (CDM)
Children with congenital myotonic dystrophy. No intervention will be administered to either group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Childhood Myotonic Dystrophy
Children with childhood myotonic dystrophy. No intervention will be administered to either group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A diagnosis of CDM, defined as: children having symptoms of myotonic dystrophy in the newborn period (\<30 days), such as hypotonia, feeding or respiratory difficulty, requiring hospitalization to a ward or to the neonatal intensive care unit for more than 72 hours; and a genetic test confirming an expanded trinucleotide (CTG) repeat in the DMPK gene in the child or mother. An expanded CTG repeat size in the child is considered greater than 200 repeats or E1-E4 classification (E1= 200-500, E2=500-1,000, E3=1,000-1,500, E4\>1,500).
* Written, voluntary informed consent must be obtained before any study related procedures are conducted.
* Age 3-17 years, 11 months at enrollment. Upper age limit not applicable for participants who previously participated in TREAT-01-001 (TREAT-CDM) study.
* A diagnosis of ChDM, defined as: children having cognitive deficits, muscle weakness, myotonia that developed after age 1 and prior to age 10 and a genetic test confirming an expanded trinucleotide (CTG) repeat in the DMPK gene in the child or mother. An expanded CTG repeat size in the child is considered greater than 200 repeats or E1-E4 classification (E1= 200-500, E2=500-1,000, E3=1,000-1,500, E4\>1,500).
* Written, voluntary informed consent must be obtained before any study related procedures are conducted.
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant trauma within the past month
* Internal metal or devices (exclusion for DEXA component)
* Use of anticoagulants, such as warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (e.g., dabigatran) due to the increased risk of bleeding with biopsy
* Platelet count \<50,000
* History of a bleeding disorder
* Participation in a clinical trial involving an investigational product
* History of adverse reaction to lidocaine (if participating in muscle biopsy)
3 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
SUNY Research Foundation
OTHER
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Roseman University of Health Sciences
OTHER
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
University of Glasgow
OTHER
University of Kansas Medical Center
OTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicholas Johnson, MD, MSCI, FAAN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Virginia Commonwealth University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bodfish JW, Symons FJ, Parker DE, Lewis MH. Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000 Jun;30(3):237-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1005596502855.
Ehlers S, Gillberg C, Wing L. A screening questionnaire for Asperger syndrome and other high-functioning autism spectrum disorders in school age children. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999 Apr;29(2):129-41. doi: 10.1023/a:1023040610384.
Huckabee ML, McIntosh T, Fuller L, Curry M, Thomas P, Walshe M, McCague E, Battel I, Nogueira D, Frank U, van den Engel-Hoek L, Sella-Weiss O. The Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (TOMASS): reliability, validity and international normative data. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):144-156. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12332. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Porter K, Smart S, Hennessey N, Cocks N. Chewing skills in two and three year old children: Gender and age comparisons on an adapted version of the test of mastication and swallowing (TOMASS-C). Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Feb;26(1):38-44. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2152867. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
Frank U, van den Engel-Hoek L, Nogueira D, Schindler A, Adams S, Curry M, Huckabee ML. International standardisation of the test of masticating and swallowing solids in children. J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Feb;46(2):161-169. doi: 10.1111/joor.12728. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
Patel R, Connaghan K, Franco D, Edsall E, Forgit D, Olsen L, Ramage L, Tyler E, Russell S. "The caterpillar": a novel reading passage for assessment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Feb;22(1):1-9. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0134). Epub 2012 Jul 30.
Berggren KN, Hung M, Dixon MM, Bounsanga J, Crockett B, Foye MD, Gu Y, Campbell C, Butterfield RJ, Johnson NE. Orofacial strength, dysarthria, and dysphagia in congenital myotonic dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2018 Sep;58(3):413-417. doi: 10.1002/mus.26176.
Gavazzi F, Adang L, Waldman A, Jan AK, Liu G, Lorch SA, DeMauro SB, Shults J, Pierce SR, Ballance E, Kornafel T, Harrington A, Glanzman AM, Vanderver A. Reliability of the Telemedicine Application of the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 in Patients With Leukodystrophy. Pediatr Neurol. 2021 Dec;125:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.09.012. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
McDonald CM, Marden JR, Shieh PB, Wong BL, Lane H, Zhang A, Nguyen H, Frean M, Trifillis P, Koladicz K, Signorovitch J. Disease progression rates in ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy by steroid type, patient age and functional status. J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Apr;12(4):e220190. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0190. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Eriksson BM, Ekstrom AB, Peny-Dahlstrand M. Daily activity performance in congenital and childhood forms of myotonic dystrophy type 1: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Jun;62(6):723-728. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14395. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
Johnson NE, Ekstrom AB, Campbell C, Hung M, Adams HR, Chen W, Luebbe E, Hilbert J, Moxley RT 3rd, Heatwole CR. Parent-reported multi-national study of the impact of congenital and childhood onset myotonic dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Jul;58(7):698-705. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12948. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
Johnson NE, Butterfield R, Berggren K, Hung M, Chen W, DiBella D, Dixon M, Hayes H, Pucillo E, Bounsanga J, Heatwole C, Campbell C. Disease burden and functional outcomes in congenital myotonic dystrophy: A cross-sectional study. Neurology. 2016 Jul 12;87(2):160-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002845. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
Timchenko L. Correction of RNA-Binding Protein CUGBP1 and GSK3beta Signaling as Therapeutic Approach for Congenital and Adult Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 21;21(1):94. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010094.
Charlet-B N, Savkur RS, Singh G, Philips AV, Grice EA, Cooper TA. Loss of the muscle-specific chloride channel in type 1 myotonic dystrophy due to misregulated alternative splicing. Mol Cell. 2002 Jul;10(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00572-5.
Wagner SD, Struck AJ, Gupta R, Farnsworth DR, Mahady AE, Eichinger K, Thornton CA, Wang ET, Berglund JA. Dose-Dependent Regulation of Alternative Splicing by MBNL Proteins Reveals Biomarkers for Myotonic Dystrophy. PLoS Genet. 2016 Sep 28;12(9):e1006316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006316. eCollection 2016 Sep.
Osborne RJ, Lin X, Welle S, Sobczak K, O'Rourke JR, Swanson MS, Thornton CA. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional impact of toxic RNA in myotonic dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2009 Apr 15;18(8):1471-81. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp058. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
Wheeler TM. Myotonic dystrophy: therapeutic strategies for the future. Neurotherapeutics. 2008 Oct;5(4):592-600. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.08.001.
Mankodi A, Teng-Umnuay P, Krym M, Henderson D, Swanson M, Thornton CA. Ribonuclear inclusions in skeletal muscle in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2. Ann Neurol. 2003 Dec;54(6):760-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.10763.
Mankodi A, Takahashi MP, Jiang H, Beck CL, Bowers WJ, Moxley RT, Cannon SC, Thornton CA. Expanded CUG repeats trigger aberrant splicing of ClC-1 chloride channel pre-mRNA and hyperexcitability of skeletal muscle in myotonic dystrophy. Mol Cell. 2002 Jul;10(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00563-4.
Campbell C, Sherlock R, Jacob P, Blayney M. Congenital myotonic dystrophy: assisted ventilation duration and outcome. Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):811-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.811.
Johnson NE, Luebbe E, Eastwood E, Chin N, Moxley RT 3rd, Heatwole CR. The impact of congenital and childhood myotonic dystrophy on quality of life: a qualitative study of associated symptoms. J Child Neurol. 2014 Jul;29(7):983-6. doi: 10.1177/0883073813484804. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Campbell C, Levin S, Siu VM, Venance S, Jacob P. Congenital myotonic dystrophy: Canadian population-based surveillance study. J Pediatr. 2013 Jul;163(1):120-5.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.12.070. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
Johnson NE, Butterfield RJ, Mayne K, Newcomb T, Imburgia C, Dunn D, Duval B, Feldkamp ML, Weiss RB. Population-Based Prevalence of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Using Genetic Analysis of Statewide Blood Screening Program. Neurology. 2021 Feb 16;96(7):e1045-e1053. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011425. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Mahadevan M, Tsilfidis C, Sabourin L, Shutler G, Amemiya C, Jansen G, Neville C, Narang M, Barcelo J, O'Hoy K, et al. Myotonic dystrophy mutation: an unstable CTG repeat in the 3' untranslated region of the gene. Science. 1992 Mar 6;255(5049):1253-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1546325.
Brook JD, McCurrach ME, Harley HG, Buckler AJ, Church D, Aburatani H, Hunter K, Stanton VP, Thirion JP, Hudson T, et al. Molecular basis of myotonic dystrophy: expansion of a trinucleotide (CTG) repeat at the 3' end of a transcript encoding a protein kinase family member. Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):799-808. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90154-5.
Fu YH, Pizzuti A, Fenwick RG Jr, King J, Rajnarayan S, Dunne PW, Dubel J, Nasser GA, Ashizawa T, de Jong P, et al. An unstable triplet repeat in a gene related to myotonic muscular dystrophy. Science. 1992 Mar 6;255(5049):1256-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1546326.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TREAT-01-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.