The Impact of Methylene Blue on the Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT ID: NCT06747195
Last Updated: 2025-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
290 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-01-01
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methylene blue (MB) is a water-soluble thiazine dye used to treat various conditions and has been found to have a unique analgesic property through the temporary disruption of anal sensory nerve terminals in patients. Studies conducted in Singapore and China have shown that perianal intradermal injection of MB provides temporary pain relief after hemorrhoidectomy and lateral anal sphincterotomy. However, there is limited published information regarding the impact of MB on the quality of recovery in anorectal surgery. This study aims to evaluate the effect of intradermal MB combined with ropivacaine injection on the quality of recovery for patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.
Study population Patients with symptomatic third- and fourth-degree hemorrhoids who are undergoing hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia and are admitted to the hospitals (145 for each group) will be prospectively enrolled in this study. Before participating, all patients or their caregivers will provide written informed consent. The protocol for this study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University with the protocol number Kyll-202405-041-2.
Intervention A standardized spinal anesthesia technique will be utilized, and between 7-9 mg of ropivacaine (Shijiazhuang Siyao Co., Ltd, 10ml:100mg) will be intrathecally injected between the L3 through L5 intervertebral spaces. All patients will undergo hemorrhoidectomy by colorectal surgeons with senior professional titles according to standard techniques. The postoperative analgesia regimen, with or without MB (Jichuan Pharmaceutical Group Co., LTD., 2ml: 20mg), will be determined at the discretion of the colorectal surgeon.
Data collection Clinical data, including age, sex, acute complications and total hospitalization cost, will be collected from the enrolled patients. The QOR-15 score will be calculated for all patients. Over a 6-month follow-up period, complications and the Wexner score for postoperative fecal incontinence will be recorded through telephone interviews.
Outcome measures The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the quality of recovery using the QOR-15 questionnaire, a comprehensive measure of recovery after surgery that assesses five dimensions: physical comfort (5 items), physical independence (2 items), emotional state (4 items), psychological support (2 items), and pain (2 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point scale based on its frequency on the questionnaire (higher scores indicate greater frequency for positive items and less frequency for negative items). The total score ranges from 0 (poorest recovery quality) to 150 (best recovery quality). Patients will complete the QOR-15 questionnaire at three time points: the day before surgery, postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 2 (between 4 pm and 6 pm). The postoperative day 1 score is the primary outcome of interest.
Additional assessments included the following:
The study will collect data on the Visual Analogue Score of pain at multiple time points (postoperative day 1, postoperative day 2, postoperative day 3, postoperative day 7, postoperative day 14), total hospitalization costs, dosage of analgesics three days and fourteen days after surgery, pain leading to unscheduled hospital returns or stay, and various complications such as urinary retention, fecal incontinence, itch and perianal paresthesia, secondary bleeding, perianal infection, poor wound healing at different postoperative time points (postoperative day 1, postoperative day, 1 month postoperative, 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative). Additionally, the Wexner score for postoperative fecal incontinence will be recorded at 1 month and 3 months postoperative.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Methylene Blue Infiltrating Injection on Anal Pain After Milligan-Morgan Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
NCT06660680
A Study of HR18034 for Postoperative Analgesia in Subjects Undergoing Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT05769855
Efficacy of Ice Packing Application in Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Recovery
NCT07186348
A Trial of HR18034 for Postoperative Analgesia in Subjects Undergoing Hemorrhoidectomy.
NCT05376904
Study of Pain Control in Hemorrhoidectomy
NCT00890721
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
. Moreover, the QOR-15 has been validated in patients undergoing a wide range of surgical procedures, making it a versatile and reliable measure of postoperative recovery across different medical contexts.
Methylene blue (MB) is a water-soluble thiazine dye that has been utilized to treat various medical conditions. It has been found to possess unique analgesic properties through the temporary disruption of anal sensory nerve terminals in patients. Research conducted in Singapore and China has shown that perianal intradermal injection of MB can offer temporary pain relief following procedures such as hemorrhoidectomy and lateral anal sphincterotomy. This suggests that MB may have potential applications in managing postoperative pain in certain surgical settings. Furthermore, additional studies have demonstrated that individuals suffering from severe anal pruritus (intractable anal pruritus) exhibited improved symptom scores following intradermal injection of methylene blue (MB). This suggests that MB may offer therapeutic benefits for individuals experiencing challenging symptoms of anal pruritus.
The use of methylene blue (MB) for post-hemorrhoidectomy analgesia is still a topic of debate due to certain drawbacks. For instance, there is a latency period of 4-6 hours for MB to exert its analgesic effect after subcutaneous injection, during which the patient may experience burning pain as MB destroys the nerve myelin sheath. Moreover, the use of MB in high concentrations may lead to adverse effects such as anal sensation incontinence and perianal necrosis. Given these potential risks, the study aims to evaluate the effect of intradermal MB combined with ropivacaine injection on Quality of Recovery (QOR) for hemorrhoidectomy patients. The primary hypothesis is that the QOR-15 on postoperative day 1 in patients receiving intradermal MB combined with ropivacaine injection for analgesia will be superior to that in patients receiving intravenous ketorolac for analgesia. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the efficacy and safety of this combined approach for post-hemorrhoidectomy analgesia.
Intervention In the study, a standardized spinal anesthesia technique will be used, and intrathecal injection of between 7-9 mg of ropivacaine (Shijiazhuang Siyao Co., Ltd, 10ml:100mg) will be administered between the L3 through L5 intervertebral spaces. All patients will undergo hemorrhoidectomy by colorectal surgeons with senior professional titles, following standard techniques. The postoperative analgesia regimen, with or without MB ( Jichuan Pharmaceutical Group Co., LTD., 2ml: 20mg), will be at the discretion of the colorectal surgeon. For patients receiving MB, a subcutaneous injection of 0.1% MB (1% MB 2 ml + 1% ropivacaine 5 ml + 0.9% saline 13 ml) will be administered with a skin test needle at the edge of the perianal incision in the MB Group. Patients in the ketorolac group will receive 30 mg of intravenous ketorolac ( Shandong New Times Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 1ml:30mg) at the beginning of the procedure. Additional intravenous doses of 30 mg ketorolac may be administered for in-patients, or discharged patients may receive a 10 mg ketorolac pill (Shandong New Times Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 10mg) orally if they experience moderate to severe postoperative pain (with a VAS score greater than 3). It is important to note that the maximum daily dose of ketorolac should not exceed 120 mg for intravenous use and 40 mg for oral use. This approach allows for the assessment of the efficacy of intravenous ketorolac for postoperative analgesia in comparison to the intradermal MB combined with ropivacaine injection.
Data collection The study will collect clinical data from enrolled patients, including age, sex, and acute complications such as urinary retention and secondary bleeding. Additionally, the duration of postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, and the QOR-15 score will be calculated for all patients. During a 6-month follow-up period, complications such as fecal incontinence, itch and perianal paresthesia, perianal infection, and poor wound healing will be recorded through telephone interviews. The Wexner score for postoperative fecal incontinence will also be documented. To ensure data accuracy, extensive training on the study protocol will be provided to all local principal investigators and study staff. Each case will be assigned a researcher who will verify the data against the original medical records to ensure completeness and accuracy. This rigorous approach aims to gather comprehensive and reliable data for the study.
Sample size Based on previous studies that have defined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the QOR-15 as 8, the current study has established the superiority margin for the difference in means between the groups at 8. Our preliminary data indicates that the standard deviation of QOR-15 was 11.2 in the ketorolac group and 8.6 in the MB group. The difference in the mean QOR-15 score between the two groups was 11.1. Based on these findings, the sample size calculation for the superiority test has shown that 260 patients (130 in each group) will be sufficient to demonstrate superiority with a margin of 8, a one-sided significance level of 2.5%, and a power (1-β) of 80%. However, to account for a potential 10% dropout rate, the study will aim to enroll 145 participants in each group.
Statistic The study will analyze categorical variables using Fisher's exact test. For continuous variables, comparisons will be made using independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on the appropriateness of the test for the data distribution. A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Comparisons of QOR-15, VAS, and Wexner scores between different time points will be performed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. All analysis will be conducted using R software version 3.6.3, Free Statistics software version 1.9, and SPSS version 26. Statistical significance will be set at P \< 0.05.
Outcome measures The main goal of this study is to assess the quality of recovery (QOR) using the QOR-15 questionnaire, which is a comprehensive measure of recovery after surgery. The QOR-15 evaluates five dimensions of recovery: physical comfort, physical independence, emotional state, psychological support, and pain. Each dimension consists of a different number of items, and each item is rated on an 11-point scale based on the frequency of the experience reported. A higher score indicates a higher frequency for positive items and a lower frequency for negative items. The total score ranges from 0 (indicating the poorest recovery quality) to 150 (indicating the best recovery quality).
In this study, patients completed the QOR-15 questionnaire at three different time points: the day before surgery, postoperative day 1, and postoperative day 2 between 4 pm and 6 pm. The QOR-15 score on postoperative day 1 is the primary outcome of interest, with the aim of evaluating the quality of recovery on the first day after surgery.
Additional assessments included the following:
This study will assess several outcome measures related to the postoperative period. These measures include: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain at multiple time points (postoperative day 1, postoperative day 2, postoperative day 3, postoperative day 7, and postoperative day14), duration of postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization costs, dosage of analgesics three days after surgery and fourteen days after surgery, pain leading to unscheduled hospital returns or stay, various complications at different time points (e.g., urinary retention, fecal incontinence, itch and perianal paresthesia, secondary bleeding, perianal infection, poor wound healing), these are specific postoperative complications that will be monitored at different time points (postoperative day 1, postoperative day 7, 1 month postoperative, 3 months postoperative, and 6 months postoperative). Wexner score for postoperative fecal incontinence at 1 month and 3 months postoperative. These outcome measures will provide a comprehensive evaluation of the postoperative recovery and potential complications following the surgical procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
the MB Group
a subcutaneous injection of 0.1% MB (1% MB 2 ml + 1% ropivacaine 5 ml + 0.9% saline 13 ml) will be administered with a skin test needle at the edge of the perianal incision
No interventions assigned to this group
the ketorolac group
Patients in the ketorolac group will receive 30 mg of intravenous ketorolac ( Shandong New Times Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, 1ml:30mg) at the beginning of the procedure.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged between 18 and 65 years; and
* ASA I or II.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with diabetes; or
* Alcohol or other addictive drug dependence; or
* Illiteracy, combined with mental system or severe mental illness that prevented completion of the assessment; or
* Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding; or
* Aspirin and analgesic drugs taken within 2 weeks before surgery; or
* Patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); or
* Concurrent additional anorectal diseases (e.g., perianal abscess, anal fistula, fissures, anal incontinence); or
* Patients who are participating in other clinical trials and have not reached the endpoint.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Weifang People's Hospital
OTHER
Heze Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
UNKNOWN
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Heze Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Heze, Shandong, China
Qilu hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, China
Weifang People's Hospital
Weifang, Shandong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
No. 1036, Danyang Road, Mudan District, Heze City Heze Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Role: primary
No. 44, Wenhuaxi Road, Lixia District,Jinan City Qilu hospital of Shandong University
Role: primary
No. 151, Guangwen Street, Kuiwen District, Weifang City
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Yoon S, Joo H, Oh YM, Lee J, Bahk JH, Lee HJ. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Kyll-202405(ZX)-041-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.