Orbital Atherectomy vs Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Nodules (ORBIT-SHOCK).

NCT ID: NCT06736665

Last Updated: 2024-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL).

The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL).

The aim of this pilot trial is to compare PCI outcomes and the incidence of adverse events between both techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary calcification in the form of calcified nodules (CN) is systematically associated with worse outcomes due to the difficulty in adequately dilation of the lesion and the inability to properly fracture the calcium nodule before stent implantation.

The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting CNs, identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL).

Primary endpoint: Compare both techniques in terms of achieving adequate stent expansion, measured by OCT.

Secondary endpoints: Evaluate procedural and strategy success rates, assess their impact on calcium nodule modification, and monitor the incidence of adverse clinical events at 12 months.

Patients will be monitored for 12 months after the procedure to assess the incidence of adverse events during follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD) Coronary Calcification Coronary Calcified Nodules Orbital Atherectomy Intravascular Lithotripsy Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Chronic Coronary Syndrome Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Coronary arterial disease Coronary calcification Coronary calcified nodules Orbital atherectomy Intravascular lithotripsy Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Chronic Coronary Syndrome Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) ORBIT-SHOCK ORBIT SHOCK

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Once the presence of a calcified nodular lesion is confirmed and the patient meets the inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria, the patient will be randomized to one of the two treatment techniques being evaluated in the study (OA vs. IVL) in a 1:1 ratio. A stratified randomization will be implemented based on the type of calcified nodule (eruptive or non-eruptive) to ensure equal proportions of each type between the two treatment groups.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Orbital atherectomy

The Diamondback-360 (OAS) (Abbott) device is used to perform this technique, consisting of a bidirectional, diamond-coated orbital crown that utilizes a combination of centrifugal force (creating elliptical orbits) and surface abrasion to modify the calcified plaque and increase distensibility. Additionally, the pulsatile impact of the crown at high speed can create microfractures in deep calcium. As a result, a single 1.25 mm crown can treat vessels ranging from 2.5 to 4 mm in diameter.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Orbital atherectomy

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Diamondback-360 (OAS) (Abbott) device is used to perform this technique, consisting of a bidirectional, diamond-coated orbital crown that utilizes a combination of centrifugal force (creating elliptical orbits) and surface abrasion to modify the calcified plaque and increase distensibility. Additionally, the pulsatile impact of the crown at high speed can create microfractures in deep calcium. As a result, a single 1.25 mm crown can treat vessels ranging from 2.5 to 4 mm in diameter.

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality that uses near-infrared light to provide high-definition, cross-sectional and three-dimensional images of the vessel microstructure.

These images provide additional information on the degree and characteristics of coronary artery disease compared to angiography which doesn't delineate the composition of the coronary artery. With automated, highly accurate measurements, OCT can guide stent selection, placement, and deployment.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

All patients will undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation after plaque modification using the technique assigned by randomization.

Intravascular lithotripsy

The Shockwave Medical Intravascular Lithotripsy System (Shockwave Medical) is a balloon that emits pulsatile sonic waves capable of fracturing intracoronary calcium. This therapy is administered by advancing a catheter and inflating the balloon at low pressure to deliver sonic pulses.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intravascular lithotripsy

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Shockwave Medical Intravascular Lithotripsy System (Shockwave Medical) is a balloon that emits pulsatile sonic waves capable of fracturing intracoronary calcium. This therapy is administered by advancing a catheter and inflating the balloon at low pressure to deliver sonic pulses.

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality that uses near-infrared light to provide high-definition, cross-sectional and three-dimensional images of the vessel microstructure.

These images provide additional information on the degree and characteristics of coronary artery disease compared to angiography which doesn't delineate the composition of the coronary artery. With automated, highly accurate measurements, OCT can guide stent selection, placement, and deployment.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

All patients will undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation after plaque modification using the technique assigned by randomization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Orbital atherectomy

The Diamondback-360 (OAS) (Abbott) device is used to perform this technique, consisting of a bidirectional, diamond-coated orbital crown that utilizes a combination of centrifugal force (creating elliptical orbits) and surface abrasion to modify the calcified plaque and increase distensibility. Additionally, the pulsatile impact of the crown at high speed can create microfractures in deep calcium. As a result, a single 1.25 mm crown can treat vessels ranging from 2.5 to 4 mm in diameter.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intravascular lithotripsy

The Shockwave Medical Intravascular Lithotripsy System (Shockwave Medical) is a balloon that emits pulsatile sonic waves capable of fracturing intracoronary calcium. This therapy is administered by advancing a catheter and inflating the balloon at low pressure to deliver sonic pulses.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality that uses near-infrared light to provide high-definition, cross-sectional and three-dimensional images of the vessel microstructure.

These images provide additional information on the degree and characteristics of coronary artery disease compared to angiography which doesn't delineate the composition of the coronary artery. With automated, highly accurate measurements, OCT can guide stent selection, placement, and deployment.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation

All patients will undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation after plaque modification using the technique assigned by randomization.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Shockwave

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
2. Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease with calcified nodules identified by OCT in a native vessel, eligible for percutaneous coronary revascularization.
3. Clinical presentation of chronic coronary syndrome or acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation\*.
4. Distal vessel reference diameters ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.0 mm. \* Non-culprit lesions eligible for revascularization in a staged procedure following a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are considered for inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome with ST elevation.
2. Left main disease.
3. In-stent restenosis lesions.
4. Critical stenoses where it is not possible to advance the OCT catheter across the lesion after predilation with a balloon of up to 2 mm in diameter.
5. Lesion involving a bifurcation with a secondary branch diameter ≥2 mm.
6. Cardiogenic shock.
7. Patients requiring cardiac surgery or percutaneous valve intervention within three months before or after angioplasty.
8. Pregnancy.
9. Life expectancy of less than one year.
10. Contraindication for the use of appropriate antiplatelet therapy post-revascularization.
11. Coronary artery disease with an indication for surgical revascularization.
12. Advanced chronic kidney disease or anatomical characteristics that contraindicate the use of optical coherence tomography.
13. Inability to obtain informed consent.
14. Allergy to eggs or soy, contraindicating the use of OA.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Spanish Society of Cardiology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luis Manuel Domínguez Rodríguez

Interventional Cardiologist and Clinical Researcher

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario General de Alicante

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ángel Sánchez-Recalde, MD, PhD.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0034 676 59 95 32

Email: [email protected]

Luis Manuel Domínguez-Rodríguez, MD.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0034 639 82 56 65

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

José Valencia-Martín, MD, PhD.

Role: primary

Jeremías Bayón Lorenzo, MD, PhD.

Role: primary

Ángel Sánchez-Recalde, MD, PhD.

Role: primary

Luis Manuel Domínguez-Rodríguez, MD.

Role: backup

Javier Martín-Moreiras, MD, PhD.

Role: primary

Jesús Ignacio Amat-Santos, MD, PhD.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21670242 (View on PubMed)

Lansky AJ, Messe SR, Brickman AM, Dwyer M, van der Worp HB, Lazar RM, Pietras CG, Abrams KJ, McFadden E, Petersen NH, Browndyke J, Prendergast B, Ng VG, Cutlip DE, Kapadia S, Krucoff MW, Linke A, Moy CS, Schofer J, van Es GA, Virmani R, Popma J, Parides MK, Kodali S, Bilello M, Zivadinov R, Akar J, Furie KL, Gress D, Voros S, Moses J, Greer D, Forrest JK, Holmes D, Kappetein AP, Mack M, Baumbach A. Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: An Academic Research Consortium Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 14;69(6):679-691. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.045.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28183511 (View on PubMed)

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD; ESC Scientific Document Group. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30165617 (View on PubMed)

Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, Onuma Y, Morel MA, van Es GA, Zuckerman B, Fearon WF, Taggart D, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Cutlip D, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 14;39(23):2192-2207. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy223.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29897428 (View on PubMed)

Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Ali Z, Wijns W, Bezerra HG, Shite J, Genereux P, Nichols M, Jenkins P, Witzenbichler B, Mintz GS, Stone GW. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1704-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.024.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26585621 (View on PubMed)

Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, Banning AP, Budaj A, Buechel RR, Chiariello GA, Chieffo A, Christodorescu RM, Deaton C, Doenst T, Jones HW, Kunadian V, Mehilli J, Milojevic M, Piek JJ, Pugliese F, Rubboli A, Semb AG, Senior R, Ten Berg JM, Van Belle E, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Vidal-Perez R, Winther S; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3415-3537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 39210710 (View on PubMed)

Holm NR, Andreasen LN, Neghabat O, Laanmets P, Kumsars I, Bennett J, Olsen NT, Odenstedt J, Hoffmann P, Dens J, Chowdhary S, O'Kane P, Bulow Rasmussen SH, Heigert M, Havndrup O, Van Kuijk JP, Biscaglia S, Mogensen LJH, Henareh L, Burzotta F, H Eek C, Mylotte D, Llinas MS, Koltowski L, Knaapen P, Calic S, Witt N, Santos-Pardo I, Watkins S, Lonborg J, Kristensen AT, Jensen LO, Calais F, Cockburn J, McNeice A, Kajander OA, Heestermans T, Kische S, Eftekhari A, Spratt JC, Christiansen EH; OCTOBER Trial Group. OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions. N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1477-1487. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307770. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37634149 (View on PubMed)

Ali ZA, Landmesser U, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Shlofmitz RA, Guagliumi G, Price MJ, Hill JM, Akasaka T, Prati F, Bezerra HG, Wijns W, Leistner D, Canova P, Alfonso F, Fabbiocchi F, Dogan O, McGreevy RJ, McNutt RW, Nie H, Buccola J, West NEJ, Stone GW; ILUMIEN IV Investigators. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1466-1476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37634188 (View on PubMed)

Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Kim SM, Yun KH, Cho JY, Kim CJ, Ahn HS, Nam CW, Yoon HJ, Park YH, Lee WS, Jeong JO, Song PS, Doh JH, Jo SH, Yoon CH, Kang MG, Koh JS, Lee KY, Lim YH, Cho YH, Cho JM, Jang WJ, Chun KJ, Hong D, Park TK, Yang JH, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Hahn JY; RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI Investigators. Intravascular Imaging-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023 May 4;388(18):1668-1679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36876735 (View on PubMed)

Shin D, Dakroub A, Singh M, Malik S, Sakai K, Maehara A, Shlofmitz E, Jeremias A, Shlofmitz RA, Ali ZA. Debulking Effect of Orbital Atherectomy for Calcified Nodule Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug;17(8):e014145. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014145. Epub 2024 Jul 1. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38946577 (View on PubMed)

Chiang CSM, Alan Chan KC, Lee M, Chan KT. Orbital-Tripsy: Novel Combination of Orbital-Atherectomy and Intravascular-Lithotripsy, in Calcified Coronaries After Failed Intravascular-Lithotripsy. JACC Case Rep. 2020 Dec 16;2(15):2437-2444. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.10.027. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34317190 (View on PubMed)

Rola P, Wlodarczak S, Barycki M, Furtan L, Jastrzebski A, Kedzierska M, Doroszko A, Lesiak M, Wlodarczak A. Safety and Efficacy of Orbital Atherectomy in the All-Comer Population: Mid-Term Results of the Lower Silesian Orbital Atherectomy Registry (LOAR). J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 8;12(18):5842. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185842.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37762782 (View on PubMed)

Okamoto N, Ueda H, Bhatheja S, Vengrenyuk Y, Aquino M, Rabiei S, Barman N, Kapur V, Hasan C, Mehran R, Baber U, Kini AS, Sharma SK. Procedural and one-year outcomes of patients treated with orbital and rotational atherectomy with mechanistic insights from optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention. 2019 Apr 20;14(17):1760-1767. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01060.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29957595 (View on PubMed)

Yamamoto MH, Maehara A, Karimi Galougahi K, Mintz GS, Parviz Y, Kim SS, Koyama K, Amemiya K, Kim SY, Ishida M, Losquadro M, Kirtane AJ, Haag E, Sosa FA, Stone GW, Moses JW, Ochiai M, Shlofmitz RA, Ali ZA. Mechanisms of Orbital Versus Rotational Atherectomy Plaque Modification in Severely Calcified Lesions Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2584-2586. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.031. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29268891 (View on PubMed)

Yamamoto MH, Maehara A, Kim SS, Koyama K, Kim SY, Ishida M, Fujino A, Haag ES, Alexandru D, Jeremias A, Sosa FA, Karimi Galougahi K, Kirtane AJ, Moses JW, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Shlofmitz RA. Effect of orbital atherectomy in calcified coronary artery lesions as assessed by optical coherence tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jun 1;93(7):1211-1218. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27902. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30328257 (View on PubMed)

Okamoto N, Egami Y, Nohara H, Kawanami S, Sugae H, Kawamura A, Ukita K, Matsuhiro Y, Nakamura H, Yasumoto K, Tsuda M, Matsunaga-Lee Y, Yano M, Nishino M, Tanouchi J. Direct Comparison of Rotational vs Orbital Atherectomy for Calcified Lesions Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Sep 11;16(17):2125-2136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.06.016.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37704299 (View on PubMed)

Faria D, Vinhas H, Bispo J, Guedes J, Marto S, Palmeiro H, Franco P, Mimoso J. Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a non-surgical center in Portugal. Rev Port Cardiol. 2024 Dec;43(12):659-665. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 Jul 8. English, Portuguese.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38986811 (View on PubMed)

Florek K, Bartoszewska E, Biegala S, Klimek O, Malcharczyk B, Kubler P. Rotational Atherectomy, Orbital Atherectomy, and Intravascular Lithotripsy Comparison for Calcified Coronary Lesions. J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 23;12(23):7246. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237246.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38068298 (View on PubMed)

Chambers JW, Feldman RL, Himmelstein SI, Bhatheja R, Villa AE, Strickman NE, Shlofmitz RA, Dulas DD, Arab D, Khanna PK, Lee AC, Ghali MG, Shah RR, Davis TP, Kim CY, Tai Z, Patel KC, Puma JA, Makam P, Bertolet BD, Nseir GY. Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orbital atherectomy system in treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions (ORBIT II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):510-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.158.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24852804 (View on PubMed)

Parikh K, Chandra P, Choksi N, Khanna P, Chambers J. Safety and feasibility of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions: the ORBIT I trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1134-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24700. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23460596 (View on PubMed)

Ali ZA, Kereiakes D, Hill J, Saito S, Di Mario C, Honton B, Gonzalo N, Riley R, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Stone GW, Shlofmitz R. Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Nodules. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May 8;16(9):1122-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.02.015. Epub 2023 Apr 5. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37029020 (View on PubMed)

Akasaka T, Kubo T. OCT-derived coronary calcified nodules as a predictor of high-risk patients. EuroIntervention. 2020 Aug 28;16(5):361-363. doi: 10.4244/EIJV16I5A65. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32855116 (View on PubMed)

Prati F, Gatto L, Fabbiocchi F, Vergallo R, Paoletti G, Ruscica G, Marco V, Romagnoli E, Boi A, Fineschi M, Calligaris G, Tamburino C, Crea F, Ozaki Y, Alfonso F, Arbustini E. Clinical outcomes of calcified nodules detected by optical coherence tomography: a sub-analysis of the CLIMA study. EuroIntervention. 2020 Aug 28;16(5):380-386. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01120.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32310133 (View on PubMed)

Ali ZA, Kereiakes DJ, Hill JM, Saito S, Di Mario C, Honton B, Gonzalo N, Riley RF, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Shin D, Stone GW, Shlofmitz RA. Impact of Calcium Eccentricity on the Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy: Pooled Analysis From the Disrupt CAD Studies. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Oct;16(10):e012898. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012898. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37847770 (View on PubMed)

McInerney A, Travieso A, Jeronimo Baza A, Alfonso F, Del Val D, Cerrato E, Garcia de Lara J, Pinar E, Perez de Prado A, Jimenez Quevedo P, Tirado-Conte G, Nombela-Franco L, Brugaletta S, Cepas-Guillen P, Sabate M, Cubero Gallego H, Vaquerizo B, Jurado A, Varbella F, Jimenez M, Garcia Escobar A, de la Torre JM, Amat Santos I, Jimenez Diaz VA, Escaned J, Gonzalo N. Impact of coronary calcium morphology on intravascular lithotripsy. EuroIntervention. 2024 May 20;20(10):e656-e668. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00605.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38776142 (View on PubMed)

Brott BC. The Calcified Nodule Paradox. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May 8;16(9):1036-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.04.001. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37164600 (View on PubMed)

Sato T, Matsumura M, Yamamoto K, Shlofmitz E, Moses JW, Khalique OK, Thomas SV, Tsoulios A, Cohen DJ, Mintz GS, Shlofmitz RA, Jeremias A, Ali ZA, Maehara A. Impact of Eruptive vs Noneruptive Calcified Nodule Morphology on Acute and Long-Term Outcomes After Stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May 8;16(9):1024-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.009.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 37164599 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ORBIT-SHOCK

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id