The xDAPT External Validation Study

NCT ID: NCT06736626

Last Updated: 2025-03-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is routinely recommended after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to prevent thrombotic complications. However, DAPT is also associated with an increased risk of bleeding, which may have a similar or even greater impact on prognosis compared to recurrent ischemic events.

To balance these risks, individualized risk stratification at the time of PCI is crucial for determining the optimal DAPT composition and duration, aiming to reduce thrombotic risk while minimizing bleeding complications. For this purpose, an artificial intelligence-based risk stratification tool (xDAPT, Abbott) was introduced and demonstrated strong clinical performance in its development study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06089304).

This analysis aims to evaluate the performance of xDAPT in a real-world cohort of patients who underwent PCI over the past decade at a large urban center (Mount Sinai Hospital, New York).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

While dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to prevent thrombotic complications, it is notably associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Recent evidence suggests that bleeding events occurring early after PCI have a prognostic impact comparable to or even greater than that of recurrent ischemic events. Currently, decisions regarding DAPT duration and composition after PCI are guided by several risk scores that classify patients as having a high bleeding and/or high ischemic risk based on predefined clinical or angiographic factors. However, the predictive performance of these scores is suboptimal, primarily due to the limitations of the analytical approaches used in their development, which typically rely on linear models incapable of capturing the complex interplay of multiple clinical variables.

Machine learning (ML) methods offer the potential to address these limitations by leveraging algorithms to analyze large datasets and identify high-dimensional, non-linear relationships among variables. The xDAPT (Abbott), is a recently developed ML-based tool consisting of two separate random forest survival models for predicting ischemic and bleeding risks, respectively (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06089304). Each model incorporates 11 clinical variables identified as the most relevant predictors for ischemic and bleeding events. The xDAPT model was developed and internally validated using a pooled dataset of 11 clinical trials on the XIENCE stent, including approximately 19,000 patients who underwent PCI with an everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE, Abbott) across 21 countries between 2008 and 2020. Within the test cohort of this dataset, both ischemic and bleeding risk models demonstrated good discriminatory ability, achieving a C-index of ≥0.65 for the prediction of their respective outcomes.

However, the generalizability of the xDAPT tool for routine clinical practice remains to be established, as it has not yet been validated in an independent real-world population of patients receiving PCI with various DES types. The present study aims to externally validate the ischemic and bleeding risk models of xDAPT using data from consecutive patients who underwent PCI at a large urban hospital (Mount Sinai, New York, US) between 2012 and 2022. Consistent with the internal validation analysis, the performance goal for the model will be defined as achieving a C-index of ≥0.65 at the lower 97.5% confidence interval of the bootstrap C-index distribution.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ischemic cohort

All patients sustaining an ischemic event (i.e., death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis) after hospital discharge and within 1 year of PCI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a catheter-based technique performed under fluoroscopic guidance to treat coronary artery disease and restore blood flow to the myocardium. During PCI, coronary vessel patency is generally achieved with drug-eluting stents (DES), which are metallic scaffolds coated with a polymer that carry and gradually release an antiproliferative drug. In the present study, all participants underwent PCI with implantation of DES, and received a subsequent course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), as clinically indicated.

Bleeding cohort

All patients sustaining a major bleeding event (i.e., requiring a blood transfusion or a repeat hospitalization) after hospital discharge and within 1 year of PCI.

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type DEVICE

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a catheter-based technique performed under fluoroscopic guidance to treat coronary artery disease and restore blood flow to the myocardium. During PCI, coronary vessel patency is generally achieved with drug-eluting stents (DES), which are metallic scaffolds coated with a polymer that carry and gradually release an antiproliferative drug. In the present study, all participants underwent PCI with implantation of DES, and received a subsequent course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), as clinically indicated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a catheter-based technique performed under fluoroscopic guidance to treat coronary artery disease and restore blood flow to the myocardium. During PCI, coronary vessel patency is generally achieved with drug-eluting stents (DES), which are metallic scaffolds coated with a polymer that carry and gradually release an antiproliferative drug. In the present study, all participants underwent PCI with implantation of DES, and received a subsequent course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), as clinically indicated.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with any DES implantation at Mount Sinai Hospital (New York, US) between January, 2012 and December, 2022.
* Age ≥18 years
* Ability to provide informed consent for the procedure and subsequent data collection

Exclusion Criteria

* PCI with bare-metal stents (BMS) or balloon angioplasty only
* Cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest as indication to PCI
* In-hospital mortality
* No available clinical follow-up
* Missing data from any of the variables included in the risk models
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roxana Mehran

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roxana Mehran

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY-24-01615

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bioflow-DAPT Study
NCT04137510 COMPLETED PHASE4
The SENTRY Clinical Study
NCT01975090 COMPLETED NA
COBRA SHIELD OCT Study
NCT02224235 TERMINATED NA