Intraoperatory Hemodynamic Monitoring in OLT

NCT ID: NCT06703008

Last Updated: 2024-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different hemodynamic monitoring techniques during orthotopic liver transplantation.

The main question it aims to answer is: if using a different hemodynamic monitoring might help reducing the intraoperative hypotension time. Participants will be randomized to one of two arms of hemodynamic monitoring:

* conventional monitoring with pulmonary artery catheter
* monitoring with transesophageal echocardiography Researchers will compare the two groups to see if there is any difference in the intraoperatory hypotension time and in secondary outcomes such as organ dysfunctions or mortality.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intraoperative hypotension is an independent risk factor for the development of complications and postoperative mortality. In non-cardiac surgery, in particular, the time spent under a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 55 correlates with an increase in myocardial ischemic damage, acute renal failure, and 30-day mortality.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a complex and risky procedure both from a surgical and an anesthesiological standpoint. Difficulties in hemodynamic management arise from the pathophysiological alterations in cirrhotic patients, high-impact surgical procedures (e.g., caval and portal clamping), high bleeding risk, and post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS).

In liver transplantation, the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains the "gold standard" for hemodynamic instability monitoring and is placed in over 90% of patients in the USA.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a semi-invasive ultrasound monitoring procedure. As recognized in a recent position paper by the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA), there has been a considerable increase in the use of TEE during OLT in recent years, despite the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) confirming its effectiveness. According to the SATA task force, the increased intraoperative use of TEE is imputable to the chance for a more thorough understanding of hemodynamic pathophysiology and the possibility of identifying new findings, otherwise not identifiable with PAC (cardiac tamponade, gas embolism, intracardiac thrombus, papillary muscle/chordae rupture, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, etc.). The overall complication rate of TEE in the articles analyzed by SATA was found to be 0.47% compared to 5-10% for PAC complications, thus supporting the safety of the procedure.

Currently, there is a lack of published RCTs comparing these monitoring methods to determine if there is an optimal intraoperative monitoring system during OLT.

The research hypothesis of this study is that TEE monitoring allows for better hemodynamic management during OLT, reducing the duration of hypotension and providing better guidance fo fluid-pharmacological therapy compared to standard monitoring (PAC).

The primary outcome is to compare the impact of two different hemodynamic monitoring systems (TEE and PAC) on intraoperative hemodynamic optimization during OLT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liver Transplantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PAC hemodynamic monitoring

Patients undergoing Liver Transplantation are monitored using the pulmonary artery catheter.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

TEE hemodynamic monitoring

Patients undergoing Liver Transplantation are monitored using Transesophageal echocardiography and blinded to the pulmonary artery catheter data (insertion of PAC for patient safety is still mandatory, unblinding is allowed if needed for management by the OR anesthesiologist in charge)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TEE hemodynamic monitoring

Intervention Type OTHER

Transesophageal echocardiography monitoring to guide administration of fluids, vasopressor and inotropes during liver transplantation in order to avoid hypotension.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TEE hemodynamic monitoring

Transesophageal echocardiography monitoring to guide administration of fluids, vasopressor and inotropes during liver transplantation in order to avoid hypotension.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Candidate for Liver Transplantation
* Acceptance of informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Bleeding esophageal varices
* Bleeding gastro-esophageal ulcer
* Gastro-esophageal anomalies (congenital, acquired or post-surgical)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amedeo Bianchini, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IRCSS AOU di Bologna

Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Amedeo Bianchini, MD

Role: CONTACT

051 2143101 ext. +39

Matteo Bianchin, MD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEIO21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.