Switching From Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Monotherapy With Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
NCT ID: NCT06691191
Last Updated: 2025-01-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-08
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Switching From Prasugrel to Ticagrelor
NCT02016170
Comparison of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy De-escalation by Dose Reduction Versus Switching in Patients Undergoing PCI: The Switching Antiplatelet-8 (SWAP-8) Study
NCT06821191
Tailoring P2Y12 Inhibiting Therapy in Patients Requiring Oral Anticoagulation After PCI
NCT04483583
Switching From Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
NCT02287909
Effects of Low-dose Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Stable Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
NCT06228456
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The ISAR-REACT (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) 5 trial showed that in ACS patients the incidence of major cardiovascular events was lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. Based on these findings, European guidelines now suggest that prasugrel should be considered in preference to ticagrelor for ACS patients who proceed to PCI. Moreover, PD studies showed that, compared with ticagrelor, prasugrel provides similar or even superior platelet inhibition \[16,17\]. However, this clinical PD data is in the context of using prasugrel in the context of a DAPT regimen (i.e., in adjunct to aspirin) and data on the use of prasugrel-based SAPT following PCI are limited.
Overall, these observations as well as the lack of head-to-head comparisons on the clinical and PD efficacy of ticagrelor-based and prasugrel-based SAPT underscore the importance of conducting dedicated investigations to compare these approaches. To determine if the PD profiles of ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based SAPT are comparable, we aim to conduct a non-inferiority study between the two strategies. Such investigation may provide insights into the safety and efficacy of these strategies and set the foundation for larger-scale investigations assessing clinical outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ticagrelor monotherapy
Ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy for 21±7 days
Ticagrelor 90 mg
After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.
Prasugrel monotherapy
Prasugrel 10 mg qd for 21±7 days
Prasugrel 10 mg
After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ticagrelor 90 mg
After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.
Prasugrel 10 mg
After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age between 18 and 75 years old
3. Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. PCI within 90 days.
3. History of stroke/TIA
4. Age \> 75 years old
5. Weight \< 60 kg
6. History of intracranial hemorrhage
7. On treatment with any oral anticoagulant or chronic low-molecular-weight heparin (at venous thrombosis treatment, not for prophylaxis)
8. Patients with known coagulation disorders
9. Known severe hepatic impairment
10. Hypersensitivity to prasugrel or ticagrelor
11. Pregnant and breastfeeding persons \[persons of childbearing age must use reliable birth control (i.e., oral contraceptives) while participating in the study\]. If the potential subject is a person of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test will be done. If the subject is pregnant, participation in this study will end.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francesco Franchi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Florida Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Francesco Franchi, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB202401578
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.