Switching From Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Monotherapy With Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors

NCT ID: NCT06691191

Last Updated: 2025-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-08

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ticagrelor currently represents the most tested and commonly used P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following percutaneous coronary intervention. The purpose of this study is to conduct a head-to-head comparison on the pharmacodynamic efficacy of ticagrelor-based and prasugrel-based single antiplatelet therapy. To determine if the PD profiles of ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based SAPT are comparable, we aim to conduct a non-inferiority study between the two strategies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A strategy of P2Y12 monotherapy after 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is associated with a substantial reduction in bleeding events without an increase in atherothrombotic events, including in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, different P2Y12 inhibitors vary in safety and efficacy profiles in the setting of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). In the TICO (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome) trial, DAPT discontinuation at 3 months with transition to ticagrelor monotherapy was superior to standard 12-month DAPT for 1-year net adverse cardiac events in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Similarly, the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial showed that in high-risk patients who have completed an initial 3-month course of DAPT following PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced clinically meaningful bleeding events without increasing ischemic risk as compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin. In contrast, in STOPDAPT-2 ACS (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2 Study for the Patients With ACS), discontinuation of DAPT at 1 to 2 months after ACS PCI with transition to clopidogrel monotherapy was not noninferior to 12-month DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for 1-year net adverse cardiac events, due to a numerical increase in atherothrombotic events despite reduction in bleeding events. These data suggest that potent P2Y12 inhibitors should be preferred over clopidogrel in the setting of early SAPT after PCI in high-risk patients.

The ISAR-REACT (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) 5 trial showed that in ACS patients the incidence of major cardiovascular events was lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. Based on these findings, European guidelines now suggest that prasugrel should be considered in preference to ticagrelor for ACS patients who proceed to PCI. Moreover, PD studies showed that, compared with ticagrelor, prasugrel provides similar or even superior platelet inhibition \[16,17\]. However, this clinical PD data is in the context of using prasugrel in the context of a DAPT regimen (i.e., in adjunct to aspirin) and data on the use of prasugrel-based SAPT following PCI are limited.

Overall, these observations as well as the lack of head-to-head comparisons on the clinical and PD efficacy of ticagrelor-based and prasugrel-based SAPT underscore the importance of conducting dedicated investigations to compare these approaches. To determine if the PD profiles of ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based SAPT are comparable, we aim to conduct a non-inferiority study between the two strategies. Such investigation may provide insights into the safety and efficacy of these strategies and set the foundation for larger-scale investigations assessing clinical outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The proposed investigation will be a prospective, randomized, parallel-design, open-label study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ticagrelor monotherapy

Ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy for 21±7 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ticagrelor 90 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.

Prasugrel monotherapy

Prasugrel 10 mg qd for 21±7 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prasugrel 10 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ticagrelor 90 mg

After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Prasugrel 10 mg

After providing written informed consent, patients on DAPT meeting study entry criteria will stop aspirin and be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion using a computer-based randomization system to either: a) ticagrelor 90 mg bid monotherapy or b) prasugrel 10 mg qd monotherapy. Patients will continue the randomized treatment for 21±7 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Brilinta Effient

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients on DAPT with aspirin plus prasugrel 10 mg or ticagrelor 90 mg bid as per standard of care at least 90 days after PCI.
2. Age between 18 and 75 years old
3. Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior history of stent thrombosis
2. PCI within 90 days.
3. History of stroke/TIA
4. Age \> 75 years old
5. Weight \< 60 kg
6. History of intracranial hemorrhage
7. On treatment with any oral anticoagulant or chronic low-molecular-weight heparin (at venous thrombosis treatment, not for prophylaxis)
8. Patients with known coagulation disorders
9. Known severe hepatic impairment
10. Hypersensitivity to prasugrel or ticagrelor
11. Pregnant and breastfeeding persons \[persons of childbearing age must use reliable birth control (i.e., oral contraceptives) while participating in the study\]. If the potential subject is a person of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test will be done. If the subject is pregnant, participation in this study will end.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francesco Franchi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Florida Jacksonville

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Francesco Franchi, MD

Role: CONTACT

9042445515

Andrea Burton

Role: CONTACT

(904) 244-5617

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Francesco Franchi, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB202401578

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.