Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-17
2026-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This will be a patient-preference clinical trial, with patients offered the choice to initiate maintenance TMS versus maintenance ECT after their index ECT sessions for treatment-resistant depression. There will be no randomization or placebo involved in this study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Electric Stimulation Therapy (TEST) for Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
NCT05172271
Low Dose Intravenous Ketamine in Treatment Resistant Depression Patients
NCT02935595
Evaluating the Efficacy of Magnetic Seizure Therapy in Treatment Resistant Depression.
NCT01748708
A Double-blind Sham Controlled Trial of rTMS in Treatment Resistant Major Depression
NCT00402220
Concurrent fMRI-guided rTMS and Cognitive Therapy for the Treatment of Major Depressive Episodes
NCT03289923
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who choose maintenance TMS will initiate maintenance TMS sessions on day one of the study and continue any currently prescribed pharmacotherapy. Participants will initiate TMS treatment within 1 week of last index ECT treatment. Participants will then follow a schedule of weekly for 4 sessions, every other week for 4 sessions, and monthly for 3 sessions for a total of 11 sessions in 6 months. Investigators will use the TMS paradigm called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), which was used in the SNT trial(Cole et al., 2022; Cole et al., 2020). At conclusion of the 6 month TMS portion of the study clinical judgement will be used to determine if the patient will return to maintenance ECT treatment. RBANS for assessment of cognition will be completed at the beginning, after 6 months, and at the conclusion of the study as well in both the standard of care and TMS portions of the study.
Those who choose maintenance ECT will transition to maintenance ECT treatments in the hospital as prescribed by their treating inpatient psychiatrists. On initial visit consent will be obtained and baseline cognitive and behavioral scales assessed as follows: Antidepressant treatment history form (ATHF), alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT-C), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), quick inventory of depressive symptomology (QIDS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS), standardized assessment of personality abbreviated scale (SAPAS). Patients will then be asked to return at 6 month and 12 month intervals to repeat HDRS, QIDS, RBANS, and CGI scales.
Research data will be collected primarily through self assessment scales including Antidepressant treatment history form (ATHF), alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT-C), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), quick inventory of depressive symptomology (QIDS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS), standardized assessment of personality abbreviated scale (SAPAS).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TMS
Patients who have achieved remission of treatment resistant depression through an initial course of ECT (8 to 12 sessions) at the University of Kentucky will be identified by the ECT attending physician as a candidate for this study. They will receive TMS in this arm of study for maintenance treatment of their depression and monitored with depressive scales.
Transmagnetic Stimulation
TMS will be given for the maintenance treatment of treatment resistant depression following successful course of ECT (8-12 treatments).
ECT
Patients who have achieved remission of treatment resistant depression through an initial course of ECT (8 to 12 sessions) at the University of Kentucky will be identified by the ECT attending physician as a candidate for this study. If they elect to continue with maintenance ECT treatments which is the current standard of care, their depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning will be monitored accordingly.
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Patients will remain in standard of care treatment and receive maintenance ECT treatments for treatment resistant depression
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transmagnetic Stimulation
TMS will be given for the maintenance treatment of treatment resistant depression following successful course of ECT (8-12 treatments).
Electroconvulsive Therapy
Patients will remain in standard of care treatment and receive maintenance ECT treatments for treatment resistant depression
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide informed consent
* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Deemed appropriate for maintenance TMS by their psychiatrist
* Right-handed
Exclusion Criteria
* Related neurological disorder, or any other medical condition that would preclude TMS treatment determined by the treatment team.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Austin Messner
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Austin Messner
Senior Medical Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gopalkumar Rakesh, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Kentucky
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rachid F. Safety and Efficacy of Theta-Burst Stimulation in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of the Literature. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Nov;205(11):823-839. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000742.
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Wilson S, Croarkin PE, Aaronson ST, Carpenter LL, Cochran M, Stultz DJ, Kozel FA. Systematic review of preservation TMS that includes continuation, maintenance, relapse-prevention, and rescue TMS. J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.040. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Magnezi R, Aminov E, Shmuel D, Dreifuss M, Dannon P. Comparison between neurostimulation techniques repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation vs electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of resistant depression: patient preference and cost-effectiveness. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Aug 4;10:1481-7. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S105654. eCollection 2016.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
95789
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.