Examining the Effect of Lateralization Imagery Training on EEG Brain Oscillations in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain

NCT ID: NCT06679335

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 34 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2024-12-16
• Study Completion Date: 2025-12-01

Brief Summary

In this study, it was planned to investigate the effectiveness of lateralization and imagery training in individuals with chronic neck pain. A total of 34 individuals, 17 with chronic neck pain and 17 healthy individuals between the ages of 18-65, will be included in the study. Individuals in each group will be treated with lateralization and imagery training for 4 weeks. Before treatment, individuals' cognitive states will be evaluated with neuropsychological tests (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Stroop test). Then, after completing the Motor Imagery Evaluation, Neck Pain Task Force Scale, Pain Severity, Kinesiophobia Evaluation, Neck Disability Evaluation, Proprioception Sense Test, Body Awareness Evaluation (Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire) and Evaluation of Compliance with the Treatment Program, EEG recording of the individuals will be performed. EEG recording will be performed and analyzed with Spontaneous EEG, Oddball Paradigm and Lateralization paradigm. After four weeks of treatment, all pre-treatment tests will be repeated and then the individuals will be taken again for EEG recording. Brain oscillations will be examined through EEG analysis before and after treatment, and the extent to which brain activities have changed and the possible effect of the treatment on brain activities will be investigated.

Detailed Description

Chronic neck pain is one of the debilitating conditions that can impair the ability to perform regular daily activities, reduce productivity, and negatively impact quality of life. Approximately two-thirds of people in developed countries experience neck pain. At any given time, approximately 14% to 16% of the adult population globally experiences neck pain, with an average lifetime prevalence of 48.5%. Chronic pain is categorized as pain that lasts more than three months.

It is very important to understand neuroplasticity to know how acute pain turns into chronic pain. Local inflammation of injured tissue increases the sensitivity of peripheral sensory neurons (nociceptors), resulting in recurrent abnormal afferent input to the central nervous system. Chronic pain causes abnormal cortical reorganization and abnormal neural circuit formation in subcortical structures through neuroplastic changes in the brain. Due to chronic pain; Deterioration in body schema perception, weaknesses in perceiving somatosensory differences, deterioration in movement quality and difficulties in performing complex movements occur. Cervical afferent input to the upper centers may change for these reasons, thus cervical proprioception may be impaired.

One of the main problems of patients with neck pain is that impairment of cervical proprioception leads to impairment of cervical sensorimotor control. A study revealed that the focus of studies should be on special programs that address different aspects of sensorimotor control disorders, such as training aimed at improving proprioception and muscle coordination.

Motor imagery (MI) approach is a method created to reduce pain and improve function, especially in chronic painful situations. It is known that imagination and active movement pass through and occur through similar neural pathways. In MI, it is seen that similar regions are activated during imagination in the same way that the regions that occur during real movement and are activated in the motor cortex. In this method, premotor cortex activation is achieved without primary motor cortex activation. Movement signals are produced in cortical areas before movement is performed.

Lateralization Imagery Training (LIE) is a form of implicit motor imagery that involves determining as accurately and quickly as possible whether an image of a body part belongs to the left or right side. It has been assumed that LIE performance differences reflect changes in central nervous system functioning, errors in judgment, and changes in bodily representations. It has been shown that LIE is a complex mental task that includes cognitive, sensory, motor and behavioral processes and can be associated with them. A study showed that there was a strong correlation between LIE and proprioception.

It has been shown that individuals with chronic pain have a decrease in their ability to distinguish right-left (extremity lateralization). Being able to distinguish right from left is related to one's ability to position one's body in space. With right-left discrimination training, the higher cortical functions of the right brain hemisphere, such as whole vision, visual skills and body schema perception, are reactivated and tried to be imparted to the individual.

In some patients with chronic pain, thinking about moving the painful extremity may cause overactivation of motor-related cerebral cortices, including the cingulate motor area (SMA) and primary motor cortex, which may aggravate the cognition associated with painful experiences. For these reasons, it is an issue that needs to be investigated what kind of changes occur in patients with chronic neck pain, especially in cognitive affect and cortex activities. Electroencephalography (EEG), a non-invasive technique, is one of the methods that measure activity in the cortex. To our knowledge, there is no study in the literature investigating the effects of lateralization imagery training on EEG brain oscillations, pain intensity, kinesiophobia and proprioception in individuals with chronic neck pain.

In the light of this information, the primary purpose of the study is to a) examine whether brain activity changes at the cortex level by measuring the electrical activities in the brain during lateralization imagery training (LIE) with EEG, and b) determine whether LIE affects the severity of neck pain and disability in individuals with chronic neck pain. The aim is to examine its effects on sensory acuity, proprioception, kinesiophobia and body awareness.

The secondary aim of this study is; To evaluate the relationship between pain intensity/disability and sensory acuity, proprioception, kinesiophobia and body awareness in individuals with chronic neck pain.

The hypotheses developed to achieve these goals are; Hypothesis 1. Lateralization imagery training has an effect on brain activities in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Hypothesis 2. Lateralization imagery training has an effect on pain intensity in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Hypothesis 3. Lateralization imagery training has an effect on disability in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Hypothesis 4. Lateralization imagery training has an effect on sensory acuity (two-point discrimination) in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Hypothesis 5. Lateralization imagery training has an effect on proprioception in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Hypothesis 6. Lateralization imagery training has an effect on kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Hypothesis 5. Lateralization imagery training has an effect on body awareness in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Hypothesis 7. There is a relationship between the severity of neck pain and disability and sensory acuity, proprioception, kinesiophobia and body awareness in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Material and Method: Asymptomatic individuals with chronic neck pain will be included in the study. Individuals with chronic neck pain and asymptomatic individuals will be divided into two groups: study and control, in a randomized controlled manner. Both groups will receive 3-week lateralization imagery training; Lateralization imagery training will be given every day for the first 2 weeks, and in the 2nd and 3rd weeks, imagery training will be given 3 days a week in addition to LIE. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be applied, including 14 sessions of lateralization and 6 sessions of visualization training.

The sample size was calculated using the G*Power 3.1.9.2 analysis program. A total sample size of 34 individuals, at least 17 for both groups, was estimated with 80% power, 0.08 alpha level and 0.8 effect size.

Working Group - Neck Pain Group

Individuals with chronic neck pain can see Specialist at FSM Medical Center. Dr. Emel Deniz Şahin will be included in the working group according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. First, initial evaluations and all tests of the included individual will be performed by the physiotherapist. Secondly, individuals will be directed to the laboratory where EEG recording will be performed. Travel expenses of individuals will be covered by the physiotherapist.

Within the scope of our study, 3 weeks of training will be provided; Lateralization imagery training will be given every day for the first 2 weeks, and imagery training will be given 3 days a week in the 2nd and 3rd weeks. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be applied, including 14 sessions of lateralization and 6 sessions of visualization training.

It will be done in 4 stages:

Stage 1: Information about the demographic and physical characteristics of the participants will be obtained. NPT, motor imagery assessment will be performed to determine compliance with inclusion criteria. Then, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, body awareness, disability evaluation, sensory acuity, proprioception sensory tests will be applied to the individual.

Stage 2: Individuals' spontaneous EEG recording will be performed, followed by the Oddball Paradigm and then the Lateralization Imagination Paradigm recording.

Stage 3: Individuals will be given 3 weeks of training. Lateralization imagery training will be given every day for the first 2 weeks, imagery training will begin in addition to LIE in the 2nd week, and will continue in the 3rd week. Imagery training will be 6 sessions in total, 3 days a week. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be applied, including 14 sessions of lateralization and 6 sessions of visualization training. After LIE and imagery training is completed, individuals will be evaluated for pain, kinesiophobia, neck disability index, and Montreal cognitive evaluation. Two-point discrimination sensory test, muscle activation, and proprioceptive sensory tests will be repeated.

Stage 4: After the three-week LIE and imagery training and tests are completed, spontaneous EEG recording, Oddball Paradigm, and then Lateralization Imagination Paradigm will be repeated.

Healthy Group

According to the inclusion criteria, individuals will be included in the control group. Travel expenses of individuals will be covered by the physiotherapist.

It will be done in 4 stages:

Stage 1: Information about the demographic and physical characteristics of the participants will be obtained. NPT, motor imagery assessment will be performed to determine compliance with inclusion criteria. Then, pain intensity, kinesiophobia, body awareness, disability evaluation, sensory acuity, proprioception sensory tests will be applied to the individual.

Stage 2: Individuals' spontaneous EEG recording will be performed, followed by the Oddball Paradigm and then the Lateralization Imagination Paradigm recording.

Stage 3: Individuals will be given 3 weeks of training. Lateralization imagery training will be given every day for the first 2 weeks, imagery training will begin in addition to LIE in the 2nd week and will continue in the 3rd week. Imagery training will be 6 sessions in total, 3 days a week. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be applied, including 14 sessions of lateralization and 6 sessions of visualization training. After LIE and imagery training is completed, individuals will be evaluated for pain, kinesiophobia, neck disability index, and Montreal cognitive evaluation. Two-point discrimination sensory test, muscle activation, and proprioceptive sensory tests will be repeated.

Stage 4: After the training and tests are completed, spontaneous EEG recording, Oddball Paradigm, and then Lateralization Imagination Paradigm will be repeated.

Conditions

Chronic Pain; Neck Pain

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NON_RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Neck Pain Patients

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Lateralization Imagery Training

Intervention Type: OTHER

Lateralization Imagery Training (LIE) is a form of implicit motor imagery that involves determining as accurately and quickly as possible whether an image of a body part belongs to the left or right side. It has been assumed that LIE performance differences reflect changes in central nervous system functioning, errors in judgment, and changes in bodily representations. It has been shown that LIE is a complex mental task that includes cognitive, sensory, motor and behavioral processes and can be associated with them. A study showed that there was a strong correlation between LIE and proprioception.

Within the scope of our study, 3 weeks of training will be provided; Lateralization imagery training will be given every day for the first 2 weeks, and imagery training will be given 3 days a week in the 2nd and 3rd weeks. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be applied, including 14 sessions of lateralization and 6 sessions of visualization training.

Healty Controls

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lateralization Imagery Training

Intervention Type: OTHER

Lateralization Imagery Training (LIE) is a form of implicit motor imagery that involves determining as accurately and quickly as possible whether an image of a body part belongs to the left or right side. It has been assumed that LIE performance differences reflect changes in central nervous system functioning, errors in judgment, and changes in bodily representations. It has been shown that LIE is a complex mental task that includes cognitive, sensory, motor and behavioral processes and can be associated with them. A study showed that there was a strong correlation between LIE and proprioception.

Within the scope of our study, 3 weeks of training will be provided; Lateralization imagery training will be given every day for the first 2 weeks, and imagery training will be given 3 days a week in the 2nd and 3rd weeks. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be applied, including 14 sessions of lateralization and 6 sessions of visualization training.

Interventions

Lateralization Imagery Training

Lateralization Imagery Training (LIE) is a form of implicit motor imagery that involves determining as accurately and quickly as possible whether an image of a body part belongs to the left or right side. It has been assumed that LIE performance differences reflect changes in central nervous system functioning, errors in judgment, and changes in bodily representations. It has been shown that LIE is a complex mental task that includes cognitive, sensory, motor and behavioral processes and can be associated with them. A study showed that there was a strong correlation between LIE and proprioception.

Within the scope of our study, 3 weeks of training will be provided; Lateralization imagery training will be given every day for the first 2 weeks, and imagery training will be given 3 days a week in the 2nd and 3rd weeks. A total of 20 sessions of treatment will be applied, including 14 sessions of lateralization and 6 sessions of visualization training.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Between the ages of 18-65, having neck pain lasting more than 3 months,
• Speaks and understands the Turkish language at a sufficient level,
• Able to use telephone and computer,
• Being literate,
• Scored 21 or more on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale, which evaluates the cognitive status of individuals,
• Reporting pain intensity as 30 mm or more on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS),
• Individuals with level 3 according to the Neck Pain Task Force Scale will be included.

• Asymptomatic between the ages of 18-65,
• Individuals matched with the study group in terms of body mass index and age
• Do not feel neck or back pain that prevents them from normal activities,
• Those who have not previously received medical intervention or treatment for their neck problem,
• Being literate,
• Individuals who score 21 or above on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale, which evaluates the cognitive status of individuals, will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

• Have received physiotherapy treatment due to neck pain in the last 6 months,
• Those who have had neck surgery,
• Suspicion of malignant or systemic disease,
• Having a neurological disease or injury,
• Individuals with vertigo, nausea, visual disturbances will not be included.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Bahçeşehir University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Aysegul Bostan

Lecturer

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Özlem Ülger, Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hacettepe University

Bahar Güntekin, Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Medipol University

Ayşenur Zaim, Master (Canditate)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medipol University

Ayşegül Bostan, PhD (Candidate)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hacettepe University

Locations

Bahcesehir Universty

Istanbul, BESIKTAS, Turkey (Türkiye)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Karakaş, S., Irak, M., Ersezgin, Ö. 1998. "Wisconsin Kart Eşleme Testi (WCST) ve Stroop Testi TBAG formu puanlarının test içi ve testler-arası ilişkileri", X Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi özet kitabı, 44.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Dilek, B., Ayhan, C., Yakut, Y. 2020. "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the movement imagery questionnaire-3: Its cultural adaptation and psychometric properties", Neurol Sci Neurophysiol, 37, 221-227.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Stroop, J.R. 1935. "Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions", Journal of experimental psychology, 18, 643.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

MacLeod, C.M. 1992. "The Stroop task: The

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Manna, C.G., et al. 2011. Sayfa 392-304. "Benton Visual Retention Test in Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology", Editors: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. New York: Springer.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Carvalho, R.Cd., Maglioni, C.B., Machado, G.B., Araújo, J.Ed., Silva, J.R.Td., Silva, M.Ld. 2018.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Genebra CVDS, Maciel NM, Bento TPF, Simeao SFAP, Vitta A. Prevalence and factors associated with neck pain: a population-based study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):274-280. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28602744 (View on PubMed)

Hague M, Shenker N. How to investigate: Chronic pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Dec;28(6):860-74. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26096090 (View on PubMed)

Brumagne S, Diers M, Danneels L, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. Neuroplasticity of Sensorimotor Control in Low Back Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):402-414. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8489.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31151373 (View on PubMed)

Yam MF, Loh YC, Tan CS, Khadijah Adam S, Abdul Manan N, Basir R. General Pathways of Pain Sensation and the Major Neurotransmitters Involved in Pain Regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jul 24;19(8):2164. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082164.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30042373 (View on PubMed)

Schwoebel J, Coslett HB, Bradt J, Friedman R, Dileo C. Pain and the body schema: effects of pain severity on mental representations of movement. Neurology. 2002 Sep 10;59(5):775-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.5.775.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12221179 (View on PubMed)

Reddy RS, Tedla JS, Dixit S, Abohashrh M. Cervical proprioception and its relationship with neck pain intensity in subjects with cervical spondylosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2846-z.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31615495 (View on PubMed)

Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Man Ther. 2008 Feb;13(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Aug 16.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17702636 (View on PubMed)

Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control--Part 2: case studies. Man Ther. 2008 Jun;13(3):266-75. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Jan 3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18180194 (View on PubMed)

Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):143-164. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00230-z. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 33464539 (View on PubMed)

Jeannerod, M. 1994. "The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery", Cambridge University Press, 187-202.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Hetu S, Gregoire M, Saimpont A, Coll MP, Eugene F, Michon PE, Jackson PL. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jun;37(5):930-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23583615 (View on PubMed)

Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Chen EE, Small SL. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex. 2004 Nov;14(11):1246-55. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh086. Epub 2004 May 27.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15166100 (View on PubMed)

Osuagwu BA, Vuckovic A. Similarities between explicit and implicit motor imagery in mental rotation of hands: an EEG study. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:197-210. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25446966 (View on PubMed)

Moseley, G.L. 2012. "The Graded Motor Imagery Handbook", Noigroup publications, Australia.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Pelletier R, Bourbonnais D, Higgins J, Mireault M, Danino MA, Harris PG. Left Right Judgement Task and Sensory, Motor, and Cognitive Assessment in Participants with Wrist/Hand Pain. Rehabil Res Pract. 2018 Aug 26;2018:1530245. doi: 10.1155/2018/1530245. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30225144 (View on PubMed)

Elsig S, Luomajoki H, Sattelmayer M, Taeymans J, Tal-Akabi A, Hilfiker R. Sensorimotor tests, such as movement control and laterality judgment accuracy, in persons with recurrent neck pain and controls. A case-control study. Man Ther. 2014 Dec;19(6):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24957711 (View on PubMed)

Breckenridge, J., Ginn, K., Wallwork, S., McAuley, J. 2016. " Does Upper Limb Pain Affect the Left/Right Judgment Task? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis", HAND, 2016(11), 136.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Adın, R.M., Kuru Ç.A. 2018. "Aşamalı Motor İmgeleme Yaklaşımı/Graded Motor Imagery Approach", In book: Fizyoterapi Seminerleri E Kitap, 17-23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Osumi M, Sumitani M, Nishi Y, Nobusako S, Dilek B, Morioka S. Fear of movement-related pain disturbs cortical preparatory activity after becoming aware of motor intention. Behav Brain Res. 2021 Aug 6;411:113379. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113379. Epub 2021 May 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 34051229 (View on PubMed)

Wolpaw JR, Loeb GE, Allison BZ, Donchin E, do Nascimento OF, Heetderks WJ, Nijboer F, Shain WG, Turner JN. BCI Meeting 2005--workshop on signals and recording methods. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006 Jun;14(2):138-41. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875583.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16792279 (View on PubMed)

Ozdilek B, Kenangil G. Validation of the Turkish Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA-TR) in patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(2):333-43. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.881554. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24528299 (View on PubMed)

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15817019 (View on PubMed)

Haldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren A; Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: executive summary. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S5-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643f40. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18204400 (View on PubMed)

Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978 Aug;37(4):378-81. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.4.378.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 686873 (View on PubMed)

Yılmaz, Ö.T., Yakut, Y., Uygur, F., Uluğ, N. 2011. "Tampa kinezyofobi ölçeği"nin Türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği", Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 22(1), 44-49.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Telci EA, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE, Yagli N. The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):1732-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac9055.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19770615 (View on PubMed)

Harvie DS, Kelly J, Buckman H, Chan J, Sutherland G, Catley M, Novak J, Tuttle N, Sterling M. Tactile acuity testing at the neck: A comparison of methods. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Dec;32:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28800436 (View on PubMed)

Öksüz, Ç., Akel, B.S. 2016. Sayfa 299-312. Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Cilt 1. Editör: Karaduman A.A., Yılmaz Ö.T. Ankara: Hipokrat Kitabevi ve Pelikan Kitabevi.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Feb 1;24(3):262-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199902010-00013.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10025021 (View on PubMed)

Tousignant M, Boucher N, Bourbonnais J, Gravelle T, Quesnel M, Brosseau L. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects. Man Ther. 2001 Nov;6(4):235-41. doi: 10.1054/math.2001.0419.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11673934 (View on PubMed)

Santos, C.M.D., Ferreira, G., Malacco, P.L., Sabino, G.S., Moraes, G.F.D.S., Felício, D.C. 2012. "Intra and inter examiner reliability and measurement error of goniometer and digital inclinometer use", Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 18, 38-41.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Wand BM, Catley MJ, Rabey MI, O'Sullivan PB, O'Connell NE, Smith AJ. Disrupted Self-Perception in People With Chronic Low Back Pain. Further Evaluation of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire. J Pain. 2016 Sep;17(9):1001-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 18.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27327235 (View on PubMed)

Onan D, Gokmen D, Ulger O. The Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire in Chronic Neck Pain Patients: Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Feb 1;45(3):E163-E169. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003207.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31425430 (View on PubMed)

Cadmus-Bertram L, Irwin M, Alfano C, Campbell K, Duggan C, Foster-Schubert K, Wang CY, McTiernan A. Predicting adherence of adults to a 12-month exercise intervention. J Phys Act Health. 2014 Sep;11(7):1304-12. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0258. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24176780 (View on PubMed)

Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2129-34. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32. Epub 2006 Nov 2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17082465 (View on PubMed)

Priganc VW, Stralka SW. Graded motor imagery. J Hand Ther. 2011 Apr-Jun;24(2):164-8; quiz 169. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.11.002. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21306870 (View on PubMed)

Moseley GL. Why do people with complex regional pain syndrome take longer to recognize their affected hand? Neurology. 2004 Jun 22;62(12):2182-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000130156.05828.43.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15210879 (View on PubMed)

Wallwork SB, Butler DS, Fulton I, Stewart H, Darmawan I, Moseley GL. Left/right neck rotation judgments are affected by age, gender, handedness and image rotation. Man Ther. 2013 Jun;18(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23357411 (View on PubMed)

Sur S, Sinha VK. Event-related potential: An overview. Ind Psychiatry J. 2009 Jan;18(1):70-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.57865.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21234168 (View on PubMed)

Amin HU, Malik AS, Kamel N, Chooi WT, Hussain M. P300 correlates with learning & memory abilities and fluid intelligence. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Sep 23;12:87. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0077-6.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26400233 (View on PubMed)

Huettel SA, McCarthy G. What is odd in the oddball task? Prefrontal cortex is activated by dynamic changes in response strategy. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):379-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.009.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 14670576 (View on PubMed)

Stevens AA, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Gore JC. Event-related fMRI of auditory and visual oddball tasks. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Jun;18(5):495-502. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(00)00128-4.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10913710 (View on PubMed)

Fukami, T., Shimada, T., Akatsuka, T., Ishikawa, F., Ishikawa B., Saito Y. 2003.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Fajkus J, Mikl M, Shaw DJ, Brazdil M. An fMRI investigation into the effect of preceding stimuli during visual oddball tasks. J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Aug 15;251:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 16.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25989317 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

BAU-AYSEGULBOSTAN-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id