Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
26 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-11-01
2025-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. Lower dosages of sufentanil facilitated with dexmedetomidine can offer enough analgesia effect.
3. The investigator are planning use the most classical method for determining the ED50 or half effective concentration of sufentanil facilitated with dexmedetomidine using sequential method, which is also called" up and down method" and" ladder method".
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Sufentanil on the Postoperative Pain
NCT06260046
Whether Opioids Are Factor That Induced POD?
NCT05596071
A Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the Sublingual Sufentanil Tablet 30 mcg for Post-Operative Pain After Abdominal Surgery
NCT02356588
Oxycodone Versus Sufentanil in Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06690307
Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Combined With Different Opioid Receptors for Gastrointestinal Surgery
NCT05576675
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2. ( IOC2 values of \< 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery. IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics. If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose. If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose. Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted. Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
No interventions assigned to this group
0.83μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2. 1/1.2=0.833 ( IOC2 values of \< 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery. IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics. If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose. If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose. Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted. Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
No interventions assigned to this group
0.69μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2. 0.833/1.2=0.694( IOC2 values of \< 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery. IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics. If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose. If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose. Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted. Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
No interventions assigned to this group
0.58μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2. 0.694/1.2=0.578( IOC2 values of \< 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery. IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics. If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose. If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose. Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted. Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
No interventions assigned to this group
0.48μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2. 0.578/1.2=0.482( IOC2 values of \< 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery. IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics. If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose. If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose. Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted. Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
No interventions assigned to this group
0.4μg/ kg group
Administration method of sufentanil: the dose of the first patient is 1μg / kg, and the ratio between adjacent doses is 1.2. 0.482/1.2=0.402( IOC2 values of \< 60, which were the target of this study, indicate adequate analgesic efect and analgesic level for regional surgery. IOC2 values of ≥ 60 indicate inadequate use of analgesics. If the analgesic effect of this patient is satisfactory, the next patient will use the lower dose. If the analgesic efect of this patient is not satisfactory, the next patient will use a higher dose. Starting from the first case of dissatisfaction, the number of observation units is counted. Dissatisfaction - satisfaction occurs at 7 exchange points and then the test ends.)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. BMI22-30kg/m2;
3. Those who intend to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
4. Age 18\~65 years.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with a history of chronic use of alcohol, smoke or other sedative drugs;
3. Patients took opioids and other analgesics before surgery;
4. Emergency operation;
5. Stress, anxiety resulting in secretion of catecholamine;
6. Patients with neuropsychiatric disorders, coma, depression, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease;
7. Patients with epilepsy, autonomic nervous dysfunction and other diseases with abnormal EEG results;
8. SBP\< 85 mmHg or HR\< 45次/min;
9. Has implanted pacemaker;
10. Patients were unwilling or disable to finish whole study;
11. Patients with acute upper respiratory infections, liver or kidney failure and severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
China International Neuroscience Institution
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Xuanwu hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CINI-AD-202403-13
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CINI-AD-202403-13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.