Oral Acetaminophen for Post-Op Pain Management in Bariatric Surgery Patients
NCT ID: NCT06658574
Last Updated: 2025-04-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-13
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
REduced Pain After Bariatric Surgery - Gastric Bypass
NCT06614257
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Phentermine in Patients Under Bariatric Surgery
NCT03849729
Bariatric Surgery and Pharmacokinetics of Paracetamol
NCT03538457
A Trial of the Cost Effectiveness of IV Acetaminophen in Bariatric Surgery
NCT02233400
Prospective, Double Blind, Placebo Control, Bariatric IV Ace
NCT02452320
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
No previous research was identified that evaluates the effectiveness of tablet vs liquid oral acetaminophen despite some evidence of alterations in absorption of tablets among post RYGB or LSG patients. In a small study among severely obese adolescent females, results demonstrated the participants required more than double the amount of IV acetaminophen to achieve equal serum concentrations. Additionally, a small study demonstrated that to achieve near-equivalent pain control post-operatively of colorectal surgery, IV acetaminophen was more effective when administered. Additional studies have demonstrated increased clearance of drugs metabolized by CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 pathways. These pathways are specifically involved in acetaminophen metabolism. The main pathway for acetaminophen metabolism is glucuronidation. Obesity has been associated with increase glucuronide clearance, therefore leaving less acetaminophen available for metabolism by CYP2E1. Furthermore, the anatomic and physiologic changes post-operatively, including a decrease gastrointestinal surface area and length contribute to alternations in drug bioavailability. This evidence leads to the hypothesis that higher dosing of oral acetaminophen is required to achieve adequate pain control when compared to non-obese patients. Based upon previous literature and current understanding of post-operative anatomic and physiologic alterations, there is a lack of evidence to support the preferred formulation of oral acetaminophen in this patient population.
Objective:
To evaluate the therapeutic effects on pain control of acetaminophen pills vs. acetaminophen liquid on post-operative pain control in patients status post RYGB or LSG.
Hypotheses/Research Question(s):
H0: There will be no difference in pain control between the liquid and pill formulations of acetaminophen among patients status post RYGB or LSG.
H1: The investigators hypothesize that based on post-operative changes, the liquid formulation of acetaminophen will result in improved pain control among patients status post RYGB or LSG.
Research Procedures:
Prior to initiation of the study, pharmacy, nursing, and medical leadership will be informed of the stratification of acetaminophen formulations based upon surgery day.
Patients will be stratified to two arms of the study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Trial Randomization Tool. Trial parameters using the asymptotic maximal randomization method, ratio of 1:1, and a participant count of 150 were inputted to create a randomization file. Presently, all patients receive acetaminophen as part of their multi-modal post-operative pain management. The clinical coordinator of the bariatric program on this study will recruit patients during the pre-operative admission process. Consent will occur at the bedside in same day surgery. The clinical coordinator for the bariatric program who is a study team member will be responsible for obtaining patient consent into the study. It is anticipated the consent discussion will be less than 15 minutes per patient. There is no waiting period expected.
It is anticipated that equal number of patients in both arms of the study will be obtained.
Data Points:
Variable will include length of stay (LOS), morphine equivalents, documented pain level, heart rate after cleared from anesthesia, blood pressure after cleared from anesthesia, ED visits within 7 days from discharge, hospital readmissions within 7 days, out of bed/ambulation, time to PO acetaminophen. Demographic data including age, sex, race, weight, height, BMI, co-morbidities.
Study Duration:
The enrollment period is anticipated to be three months. Total study duration, including data analysis and manuscript writing are anticipated to take two years.
Endpoints:
Participants may be removed from the study if experiencing inadequate pain control or experiencing elevated glucose levels to ensure pain control and glucose are medically managed as required. Participants will be removed from the study if they experience any allergic reactions to any formulation of acetaminophen to ensure patient safety.
Primary outcomes include pain control. Secondary outcomes include LOS and morphine equivalents.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Oral acetaminophen - Tablet
Acetaminophen 650 mg tablet by mouth
Acetaminophen
Arm 1: Once cleared for oral intake - acetaminophen tablets 650 mg PO every 6 hours PRN - mild pain (1 - 3) to a maximum of 4 grams daily for 3 days\' dispensed as unit-dose tablets Arm 2: Once cleared for oral intake - acetaminophen liquid (160 mg/5 mL) 650 mg PO every 6 hours PRN - mild pain (1 - 3) to a maximum of 4 grams daily for 3 days; 650 mg = 20.3 mL, dispensed as a unit-dose cup
Oral acetaminophen - Liquid
Acetaminophen 650 mg liquid by mouth
Acetaminophen
Arm 1: Once cleared for oral intake - acetaminophen tablets 650 mg PO every 6 hours PRN - mild pain (1 - 3) to a maximum of 4 grams daily for 3 days\' dispensed as unit-dose tablets Arm 2: Once cleared for oral intake - acetaminophen liquid (160 mg/5 mL) 650 mg PO every 6 hours PRN - mild pain (1 - 3) to a maximum of 4 grams daily for 3 days; 650 mg = 20.3 mL, dispensed as a unit-dose cup
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acetaminophen
Arm 1: Once cleared for oral intake - acetaminophen tablets 650 mg PO every 6 hours PRN - mild pain (1 - 3) to a maximum of 4 grams daily for 3 days\' dispensed as unit-dose tablets Arm 2: Once cleared for oral intake - acetaminophen liquid (160 mg/5 mL) 650 mg PO every 6 hours PRN - mild pain (1 - 3) to a maximum of 4 grams daily for 3 days; 650 mg = 20.3 mL, dispensed as a unit-dose cup
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgical: Duodenal Switch (DS) surgeries, Adjustable Gastric Banding (AGB), surgical revisions, and surgical conversions.
* Medical: patients with documented history of chronic and/or current pain syndrome, as evidenced by documentation of ICD-10 code G89.4, patients with documented ICD-10 code F11.90, indication unspecified, uncomplicated opioid use.
* Patients of vulnerable populations, as outlined by federal guidelines as children, prisoners, pregnant women, and mentally disabled persons will be excluded.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
OTHER
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel T. Abazia, PharmD
Clinical Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel T Abazia, PharmD, BCPS, CPPS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rutgers University - Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro2023002382
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.