SISIPUSH: Evaluation of Hemolysis and Iatrogenic Anemia Using the Push-pull Method to Obtain Blood from Pediatric Patients with Central Venous Catheters
NCT ID: NCT06657534
Last Updated: 2024-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-14
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For children, the relative amount of blood taken at each blood collection is greater than in adults. It is therefore expected that in children, due to the lower circulating blood volume, the relative impact of repeated blood sampling is greater and interventions such as sparing the number of blood samples or blood volume can have a relevant impact on the onset of anemia, the need for iron supplements or blood transfusions and the general clinical recovery.
For children, only limited data are available on the development of iatrogenic anemia during hospital stay. In a study of children in an intensive care unit, a decrease in hemoglobin of 0.7 g/dl can already be seen with an average stay of 4.5 days (and an average number of blood samples of 2.9) (François et al. Ped Crit Car Med, 2022). The average blood volume lost to blood samples during the stay is 3.9 ml/kg, which already corresponds to 5% of the total blood volume. Interventions to decrease the frequency of blood sampling or to perform the same analyses on a smaller blood volume (e.g. adapted, smaller blood tubes for children) are therefore useful in preventing the development of anemia during a hospital stay, especially in children.
Alternative methods have been described to save on blood volume when performing blood sampling, especially if these are performed via central venous catheters (surgically or non-surgically placed). To obtain a suitable sample via such catheters, the usual technique is to obtain 5 to 10 ml of blood and discard the volume (so-called "waste blood") before the sample for laboratory analysis is obtained (typically only 1-2 ml). A recently published technique is the so-called push-pull method (described by McBride et al, J Infus Nurs 2018), in which blood sampling can be performed without waste blood.
The push-pull technique has been studied in children, but mainly in oncological and intensive care units. Paired analyses have verified that the technique provides a reliable sample for most blood analyses, including blood count, electrolytes, liver and kidney function parameters, CRP, but also coagulation factors and therapeutic drug monitoring. The occurrence of complications, of which the development of catheter-related bacteremia is of particular importance, is not described. A beneficial effect on anemia onset has not yet been described, usually due to low patient numbers per study (23-35 patients).
In SISIPUSH, we compare the push-pull technique with the standard-of-care in hospitalised children who undergo blood sampling via a central venous catheter for diagnostic reasons (in the context of routine care). By means of a 1:1 randomization, eligible patients who gave informed consent are assigned to one of the two methods for the remainder of the hospitalization. From the moment of randomization until discharge from the hospital, data will be collected from the medical file that are collected routinely (number of blood samples, hemoglobin values, number of blood transfusions, markers of hemolysis, age and gender, reason for hospitalization, type of catheter) and compared between the two groups. In parallel, nurses score the easy of use and satisfaction with the procedure at each blood sample.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Heparin Versus Taurolidine to Bloodstream Infection Prevention Related in Central Venous Catheter in Children
NCT02515201
Comparison Of The Two Types Of Hemostasis Management Effectiveness : Thromboelastometry (Rotem) Guided Management And Conventional Method In Newborn Congenital Cardiac Surgery Patients
NCT06166940
HEMOCC Study. Hemostasis in Cirrhotic Children.
NCT03244332
Utility of Ultrasonography During Internal Jugular Vein Catheterisation in Pediatric Patients
NCT02131519
Hematological Abnormalities in Children
NCT05541835
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Push-pull technique
Push-pull technique
push-pull technique as described by McBride et al, J Infus Nurs 2018
Control
Standard of care blood sampling method with waste blood
SOC (Standard of care)
Standard of care method to obtain blood with waste blood
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Push-pull technique
push-pull technique as described by McBride et al, J Infus Nurs 2018
SOC (Standard of care)
Standard of care method to obtain blood with waste blood
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 0-18 years
* presence of a central venous catheter for diagnostic or therapeutic reasons of the type surgically placed (Hickman, port-a-cath) or non-surgically placed (vena jugularis interna, subclavia, femoralis,...)
* patent catheter with possibility of infusion of fluids and collection of blood on at least one of the lumens
* clinical and/or radiographic confirmation of correct central position of the catheter tip
* at least one blood collection per week hospitalization expected or already planned
Exclusion Criteria
0 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Ghent
OTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ONZ-2024-0215
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.