Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2026-02-28
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CEC Count Changes to Support GvHD Diagnosis.
NCT02064972
Screening for Subjects to Participate in Studies of Blood Disorders
NCT00695123
Risk Factors for Diabetes After Stem Cell Transplantation
NCT00539851
Impact of Stem Cell Donation on Unrelated and Related Donors' Health.
NCT06905704
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT02012153
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The survey will comprise multiple-choice and open questions. Expectations related to the use of dynamic consent, potential disbeliefs, and tools for promoting and regulating participation into future research studies (text, video) will also be evaluated. Statistical analysis on survey results, as well as sentiment analysis, will be performed.
The second step will consist of two main activities:
A) the realization of dynamic informed consent and assent templates for the processing and management of data and samples. The templates will be drafted based on the long-standing experience of the research teams and the outcomes of the Consent Survey, along with the available literature and guidelines. They will be designed in full compliance with the GDPR as implemented by the Italian legislation. Information on patients\' rights, purposes of data usage, legal basis and measures taken to implement lawfulness of data processing will be included.
B) The design and establishment of an innovative digital tool (a software application) to implement the dynamic consent and allowing interaction among healthcare professionals and patients. This tool will be designed considering multiple aspects, like Consent Survey results. Firstly, this tool will guide patients and caregivers to a rapid and easy access to their consent/assent, allowing them to have a clear picture of their consented studies and consenting preferences, to possibly modify and/or withdraw their consent. Secondly, new studies will be synthetically published on the digital tool, in order to favour the patients' engagement, with a particular attention to adolescents and young adults who are more familiar with these approaches, being digital natives. RD patients may be re-contacted to be informed about any new purposes of data and sample processing. The digital tool will allow healthcare professionals to give feedback on ongoing studies and to present results in layman's terms to patients. Finally, it will be of help in critical steps of the research process, such as re-consenting procedures for minors who reach the age of legal competency. Considering all the mentioned components, the digital tool will promote a high-level of transparency. The final positive impact expected is an improved process resulting in reduced costs for both patients and the National Health System. In fact, the integration of data from multiple sources will result in increased knowledge and dissemination of correct information directly to patients thus drastically reducing misinformation, duplicate visits, and optimizing patient enrolment.
The third step of this aim is the test and validation of the dynamic consent in a cohort of rare patients. Enrolling centers, both dealing with RD patients' consent on a daily basis, will conduct a pilot study enrolling a cohort of RD patients (min. 50 subjects) during clinical routine care. This step will comprise a satisfaction questionnaire - proposed to all participating patients and carers - with the final aim of identifying pitfalls and opportunities of this innovative consenting approach, and eventually implement the digital tool according to the collected responses.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Online consenting
The design and establishment of an innovative digital tool (a software application) to implement the dynamic consent and allowing interaction among healthcare professionals and patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a suspect of rare disease (based on clinical or genetic findings)
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello
OTHER
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Luca Sangiorgi
Director of Rare Skeletal Diseases Department
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grady C. Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):855-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1411250.
Cocanour CS. Informed consent-It's more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):993-997. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
Merlec MM, Lee YK, Hong SP, In HP. A Smart Contract-Based Dynamic Consent Management System for Personal Data Usage under GDPR. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 30;21(23):7994. doi: 10.3390/s21237994.
Prictor M, Lewis MA, Newson AJ, Haas M, Baba S, Kim H, Kokado M, Minari J, Molnar-Gabor F, Yamamoto B, Kaye J, Teare HJA. Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Jul;15(3):175-186. doi: 10.1177/1556264619887073. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
Dankar FK, Gergely M, Malin B, Badji R, Dankar SK, Shuaib K. Dynamic-informed consent: A potential solution for ethical dilemmas in population sequencing initiatives. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Apr 2;18:913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.027. eCollection 2020.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PNRR-MR1-2023-12377715
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
343/2024/Oss/IOR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.