EFFECTIVENESS OF CONVENTIONAL RADIOFREQUENCY OF THE GENICULAR NERVES GUIDED BY SCOPIC VERSUS ULTRASOUND FOR THE TREATMENT OF POSTQUIRURGICAL GONALGIA
NCT ID: NCT06613815
Last Updated: 2024-09-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
57 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-01
2024-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Retrospective, non-randomized observational study, between January 2019 and January 2024, comparing the analgesic effectiveness of conventional radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves performed in a cohort of patients with a scopy-guided technique (scopic group, N=19) versus the ultrasound-guided technique (US group, N=38) in patients referred to the pain unit for chronic gonalgia of moderate-severe intensity after knee surgery.
The main variable studied was the measurement of pain intensity according to the numerical rating scale (NRS) before performing the technique and at 3, 6 and 12 months after radiofrequency denervation of the geniculate nerves.
Conventional radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves of the knee significantly reduces pain intensity over a period of at least 6 to 12 months in patients with chronic postoperative gonalgia, with the ultrasound-guided technique presenting the lowest scores on the numerical pain scale.
It is a simple technique to perform and with few adverse effects, which allows patients to reduce the dose of opioid drugs they take chronically.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency of the Genicular Nerves in Patients With Chronic Knee Pain
NCT05407610
Comparison of Heated vs. Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment of the Genicular Nerves for Osteoarthritis Knee Pain
NCT04379895
Retrospective Study of the Results of Cooled Radiofrequency for Genicular Nerves Neurotomy in 40 Consecutive Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Painful Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03343808
Patients With Chronic Knee Pain Treated With Conventional Radiofrequency of the Genicular Nerves
NCT04234984
Radiofrequency Ablation of Genicular Nerves for Advanced Osteoarthrosis of the Knee Joint 1 Year Follow-up.
NCT02688543
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Retrospective, non-randomized observational study, between January 2019 and January 2024, comparing the analgesic effectiveness of conventional radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves performed in a cohort of patients with a scopy-guided technique (scopic group, N=19) versus the ultrasound-guided technique (US group, N=38) in patients referred to the pain unit for chronic gonalgia of moderate-severe intensity after knee surgery.
The main variable studied was the measurement of pain intensity according to the numerical rating scale (NRS) before performing the technique and at 3, 6 and 12 months after radiofrequency denervation of the geniculate nerves.
The following were measured as secondary variables: the degree of motor block, the reduction in the consumption of opioid drugs, the ease of performing the technique, the degree of patient satisfaction, the appearance of adverse effects and complications related to the technique.
A total of 57 patients were included in the study (19 scopic group and 38 US group). Both techniques were shown to be effective for the control of chronic knee pain. There was a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity at 3, 6 and 12 months (3 \[1-5\] vs 2 \[0-3\]; p=0.02 / 3 \[2-5\] vs 2 \[0-3\]; p=0.00 / 4 \[2-5\] vs 2 \[1-3\]; p=0.00), as well as a reduction in minor opioid requirements (52.6% vs 18.4% p=0.001) in the ultrasound-guided group. No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the consumption of major opioids or complications of the technique, except for a higher incidence of motor block in the ultrasound-guided group (Bromage scale II: 0% vs 13.2%, p=0.15), which was not clinically relevant.
The degree of patient satisfaction was high in both groups, with no differences being found.Conventional radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves of the knee significantly reduces pain intensity over a period of at least 6 to 12 months in patients with chronic postoperative gonalgia, with the ultrasound-guided technique presenting the lowest scores on the numerical pain scale.
It is a simple technique to perform and with few adverse effects, which allows patients to reduce the dose of opioid drugs they take chronically.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
(scopic group, N=19)
comparing the analgesic effectiveness of conventional radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves performed in a cohort of patients with a scopy-guided technique (scopic group, N=19)
radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves
radiofrequency of the geniculate nerveswith a scopy-guided technique versus the ultrasound-guided technique
the ultrasound-guided technique (US group, N=38)
, comparing the analgesic effectiveness of conventional radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves performed in a cohort of patients with a scopy-guided technique (scopic group, N=19) versus the ultrasound-guided technique
radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves
radiofrequency of the geniculate nerveswith a scopy-guided technique versus the ultrasound-guided technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
radiofrequency of the geniculate nerves
radiofrequency of the geniculate nerveswith a scopy-guided technique versus the ultrasound-guided technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundación Pública Galega Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
ÁLVARO MANUEL GASALLA CADÓRNIGA
Specialist doctor in area
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Álvaro Manuel Gasalla Cadórniga
Lugo, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
nº 2024/211
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.