Determining Which Regions of the Brain Are Active During Flight Simulation at Separate Timepoints During Training
NCT ID: NCT06606925
Last Updated: 2025-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-19
2026-09-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Whole-body Vibration Exercise in Brain Injury Patients With Minimally Conscious State
NCT03389113
Neural Mechanisms of Tactile Priming on Social Perceptions - Pilot Study
NCT02517060
Cognitive Control Functions of the Human Thalamus
NCT06920992
Real-Time Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Neurofeedback for Regulation of Psychophysiological Functions
NCT01921088
Functional Changes in the Brain After Tibial Nerve Stimulation: a Pilot Study
NCT03908047
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Neuroergonomics By detecting subtle changes in blood flow to different regions of a brain during a task, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) can localize the most active regions of the brain at any point in time. This technology is advancing rapidly and for specified tasks is demonstrating remarkable consistency in multiple cortical regions of the brain employed during the same task, between different individuals. The multiple regions activated during a particular task are often referred to as "functionally connected." In addition, these functionally connected regions of the brain activated during a cognitive task share an analogy with the muscles activated to accomplish a physical task. Another MRI technology can quantify the connectivity through axons located in white matter (the wires in the brain) and measure the strength of the physical connection between different regions of the brain - termed structural connectivity. Interestingly, like muscles after prolonged training, the "strength" of connections between specific regions can show measurable increases with training and repetition.
However, because of the high magnetic fields existing within MRI machines, complex devices or video displays could not traditionally be used when scanning subjects. As a result, early tasks within scanners (termed paradigms) were often serial and not representative of the highly dynamic tasks of flying. But high-resolution display systems are available that are MRI compatible - which can generate high resolution and more immersive environments. Furthermore, increasingly sophisticated input devices have also been developed that are MRI compatible and now it is possible to include a realistic flight stick to control pitch, roll, and throttle of simulated airframes.
Thus, the field of neuroergonomics -- analyzing how the brain behaves during everyday operations in a more naturalistic way - can be applied to aviation. Recent fMRI work has started to identify the neurocircuitry involved in specific flying tasks such as aerial pursuit. Other work has identified regions of the brain activated during cognitive overload where subjects did not perceive audible alarms while flying in a simulator. Furthermore, specific brain regions appear activated during video feedback after performing a complex landing task. Thus, the brain regions active during aerial pursuit, cognitive overload, and feedback - all pertinent to aviation training - are beginning to be identified. However, given that much of this data has been collected from amateurs - not highly experienced military pilots - its applicability to highly trained military aviators needs to be tested.
Applying the techniques of neuroergonomics to improve military aviator performance will require two distinct steps: 1.) The neuroanatomic circuits associated with different aspects of high-performance aviation must be identified; and 2.) for each circuit, training paradigms will need to be identified to strengthen the neuroanatomic circuit of interest to track not only behavioral performance, but the neural correlates associated with enhanced performance.
PICT Task -- MRI flight Simulation Challenges
The Precision Instrument Control Task (PICT) flight simulator test is adapted from an existing human performance study, called "Wayfinding, Hypoxia, and Interceptive Performance in Pilots Executing Transitions" (WHIPPET), which is currently being conducted at the Brooks Research Altitude Chambers with the objective of measuring the piloting deterioration that results from moderate hypobaric hypoxia. The task generates quantitative metrics to assess the accuracy and swiftness with which a pilot can execute corrective control inputs while flying. The tasks will be adapted from their current psychophysical application for use in this neuroimaging application.
Both piloting tasks will be rendered using the commercially available application software called XPlane (Laminar Research, Inc., Columbia SC), which is a PC-based simulation suite that uses believable flight controls and dynamic aircraft models to present high-fidelity simulated sorties with the visual characteristics and demands of real flight. XPlane has been used in psychophysical investigations of the effect of environmental stressors on human performance in a cockpit environment, and to identify areas of brain activation during the execution of simulated aerial pursuit tasks. For this application, XPlane will be employed to present the aerodynamic characteristics of an F/A-18F. The visual interface will include a forward "out-the-window" display incorporating a generic head-up-display (HUD) with climb-dive ladder, horizon and heading indicators, and digital airspeed and vertical velocity indicators. The display will be presented in the fMRI scanner using stereogenic goggles called the Visual System HD (NordicNeuroLab, Bergen, Norway) display mounted in the scanner via the Siemens Vida 64-channel headcoil, as has been employed successfully to construct interactive virtual reality platforms for fMRI research applications. This apparatus will present the experimental visual interface in 1920 x 1200-pixel format via stereoscopic goggles, with each eye's array extending approximately 52 x 34 deg (horizontal x vertical) in field of view. This configuration should provide ample resolution and angular subtense to produce virtual presence in the simulated environment.
Specific Aims
1. Determine what portions of brain activity correlate with level of performance during flight simulation (PICT).
2. Determine the changes in brain activity that occur during two separate timepoints.
3. Determine what portions of brain anatomy correlates with level of performance during flight simulation (PICT).
4. Determine the changes in brain anatomy that occur during two separate timepoints.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Functional (fMRI) and anatomic MRI imaging a two timepoints during pilot virtual reality simulation
Initial anatomic imaging and fMRI with virtual reality flight simulator scan with repeat testing performed at approximately 2 months (+/- 1 month) after initial scan.
fMRI with virtual reality flight simulator
During this scan, the subject will be wearing the stereogenic goggles called the Visual System HD (NordicNeuroLab) mounted in the scanner via a headcoil that can be adjusted to the subject's comfort using the control arm and completely cover the eyes to prevent light exposure and to clearly visualize eye movement during the flight simulation. The subject will be using a visual response system with customized grips to simulate a stick and throttle in a jet cockpit while visualizing the flight simulation (PICT) in the goggles.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
fMRI with virtual reality flight simulator
During this scan, the subject will be wearing the stereogenic goggles called the Visual System HD (NordicNeuroLab) mounted in the scanner via a headcoil that can be adjusted to the subject's comfort using the control arm and completely cover the eyes to prevent light exposure and to clearly visualize eye movement during the flight simulation. The subject will be using a visual response system with customized grips to simulate a stick and throttle in a jet cockpit while visualizing the flight simulation (PICT) in the goggles.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18-54 years
* Biological male or female
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \> 60 years
* Non-active-duty members
* History of recurrent migraine headaches requiring chronic suppressive medication or prescription drug intervention more frequently than once per year.
* History of head trauma or traumatic brain injury with any loss of consciousness or with confusion or amnesia of greater than five minutes.
* History of eye trauma related to a metallic object unless the presence of residual metal has been previously excluded by x-ray.
* Pregnancy
* History of significant neurological disease including cerebrovascular disease, demyelinating disease, or infections of the central nervous system (encephalitis, meningitis).
* History of medical conditions with potential neurological involvement such as obstructive sleep apnea, autoimmune disorders, etc.
* History of seizures since age six.
* Claustrophobia or intolerance of the MRI without medication.
* Any medical contraindication to MRI (ex: foreign bodies, non-MRI compatible pacemaker, metal devices).
18 Years
54 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
59th Medical Wing
FED
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
FED
The Geneva Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Sherman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
59th Medical Wing Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Joint Base San Antonio - Randolph & Lackland
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Grady CL, Rieck JR, Nichol D, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM. Influence of sample size and analytic approach on stability and interpretation of brain-behavior correlations in task-related fMRI data. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jan;42(1):204-219. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25217. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Beer J, Dart TS, Fischer J, Kisner J. Pulmonary Effects from a Simulated Long-Duration Mission in a Confined Cockpit. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Oct 1;88(10):952-957. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4854.2017.
Turner BO, Paul EJ, Miller MB, Barbey AK. Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies. Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 7;1:62. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0073-z. eCollection 2018.
Li CX, Patel S, Zhang X. Evaluation of multi-shell diffusion MRI acquisition strategy on quantitative analysis using multi-compartment models. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Apr;10(4):824-834. doi: 10.21037/qims.2020.03.11.
Bhushan C, Haldar JP, Choi S, Joshi AA, Shattuck DW, Leahy RM. Co-registration and distortion correction of diffusion and anatomical images based on inverse contrast normalization. Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 15;115:269-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.050. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
Gonzalez-Castillo J, Panwar P, Buchanan LC, Caballero-Gaudes C, Handwerker DA, Jangraw DC, Zachariou V, Inati S, Roopchansingh V, Derbyshire JA, Bandettini PA. Evaluation of multi-echo ICA denoising for task based fMRI studies: Block designs, rapid event-related designs, and cardiac-gated fMRI. Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 1;141:452-468. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.049. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Lynch CJ, Power JD, Scult MA, Dubin M, Gunning FM, Liston C. Rapid Precision Functional Mapping of Individuals Using Multi-Echo fMRI. Cell Rep. 2020 Dec 22;33(12):108540. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108540.
Tan ET, Shih RY, Mitra J, Sprenger T, Hua Y, Bhushan C, Bernstein MA, McNab JA, DeMarco JK, Ho VB, Foo TKF. Oscillating diffusion-encoding with a high gradient-amplitude and high slew-rate head-only gradient for human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2020 Aug;84(2):950-965. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28180. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
Tan ET, Hua Y, Fiveland EW, Vermilyea ME, Piel JE, Park KJ, Ho VB, Foo TKF. Peripheral nerve stimulation limits of a high amplitude and slew rate magnetic field gradient coil for neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med. 2020 Jan;83(1):352-366. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27909. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
Foo TKF, Tan ET, Vermilyea ME, Hua Y, Fiveland EW, Piel JE, Park K, Ricci J, Thompson PS, Graziani D, Conte G, Kagan A, Bai Y, Vasil C, Tarasek M, Yeo DTB, Snell F, Lee D, Dean A, DeMarco JK, Shih RY, Hood MN, Chae H, Ho VB. Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2020 Jun;83(6):2356-2369. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28087. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
Callan DE, Terzibas C, Cassel DB, Callan A, Kawato M, Sato MA. Differential activation of brain regions involved with error-feedback and imitation based motor simulation when observing self and an expert's actions in pilots and non-pilots on a complex glider landing task. Neuroimage. 2013 May 15;72:55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.028. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
Callan DE, Gamez M, Cassel DB, Terzibas C, Callan A, Kawato M, Sato MA. Dynamic visuomotor transformation involved with remote flying of a plane utilizes the 'Mirror Neuron' system. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033873. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
Durantin G, Dehais F, Gonthier N, Terzibas C, Callan DE. Neural signature of inattentional deafness. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Nov;38(11):5440-5455. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23735. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Gougelet RJ, Terzibas C, Callan DE. Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Cortex Mediate Performance of an Aerial Pursuit Task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 14;14:29. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00029. eCollection 2020.
Mehta RK, Parasuraman R. Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 23;7:889. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889.
Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:269-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135409.
Van de Putte E, De Baene W, Garcia-Penton L, Woumans E, Dijkgraaf A, Duyck W. Anatomical and functional changes in the brain after simultaneous interpreting training: A longitudinal study. Cortex. 2018 Feb;99:243-257. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
DeYoe EA, Bandettini P, Neitz J, Miller D, Winans P. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of the human brain. J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Oct;54(2):171-87. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90191-0.
Tesch PA, Hjort H, Balldin UI. Effects of strength training on G tolerance. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1983 Aug;54(8):691-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MW.65.R22
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FWH20230088H
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.