Comparison of the Efficacy of Dry Needling, Ischemic Compression, and Cross Taping on Masseter Myofascial Pain

NCT ID: NCT06606041

Last Updated: 2024-09-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-10

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether Dry Needling, Ischemic Compression, and Cross Tapes work to treat myofascial pain in masseter muscles in adults. It will also learn about the safety of this treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Do Dry Needling, Ischemic Compression, and Cross Tapes relieve masseter muscle pain?
* Which of these treatments provides the best relief from masseter muscle pain? Researchers will compare these three treatments to see which is best for treating masseter muscle pain.

Participants will:

Treated with Dry Needling or Ischemic Compression or Cross Tapes only once Visit the clinic one week, three months, and six months after treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The taut band represents the most commonly observed muscular disorder, where myofascial trigger points may arise, causing referred pain in another location. Therapeutic strategies applied for its treatment include dry needling, ischemic compression, and cross-taping.

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of these treatment methods in reducing or alleviating the intensity of pain in the masseter.

In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, the study sample underwent a clinical examination according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders to diagnose the presence of orofacial myofascial pain with taut bands in the masseter. Participants were randomly allocated to three groups based on the treatment methods.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Myofascial Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multicenter, Randomized parallel clinical trial comparing Dry Needling, Ischemic Compression, and Cross Tapes
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dry Needling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This. minimally invasive technique is based on the insertion of a sterile, low-caliber, monofilament needle, without the injection or extraction of any additional substances, into hyperirritable muscle nodules. There are two categories within this technique, based on the depth at which the needle is inserted: superficial needling (or the Baldry technique), in which the needle is inserted up to the subcutaneous cellular tissue overlying the myofascial trigger point (up to 10 mm); and deep needling, where the needle is inserted into the muscle with the intention of reaching the myofascial trigger point. Reaching the trigger point was the investigators goal. Regardless of the technique selected, the aim is to generate controlled micro spasms in the affected muscle area, alternating with periods of muscle relaxation.

Group 2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ischemic Compression

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ischemic compression is a conservative, manual technique used on myofascial trigger points, in which pressure should be exerted between 30 and 90 seconds on these same areas. It is suggested that it leads to the normalization of the biomechanical properties of muscle fibers, restoring the muscle\'s functional condition and probably reducing the risk of injury. Thus, the therapeutic effects include the stimulation of mechanoreceptors, with pain attenuation mainly due to the depletion of specific neurotransmitters and temporary obstruction of local blood flow (local ischemia), followed by a rapid influx of oxygenated blood to the area under pressure relief,(37) which will cause an increase in muscle metabolism.

Group 3

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cross Tapes

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cross tapes, as the name implies, based on an equidistant intersection of three or four polyester tapes with a non-elastic adhesive acrylic coating, with the 3 lines oriented in a latero-medial direction. It is recommended that it be applied to the muscle area where the myofascial trigger point has been detected, at a 45º angle to the muscle fibers. Its application may have several purposes, such as muscle support, improving the stability of the fibers; pain relief, especially in areas where muscle tension and/or inflammation are present; aiding lymphatic drainage; promoting blood circulation. Before it is applied, the skin should be clean (disinfecting the area with alcohol) and dry, without any lotion or other ointments and the maximum period of use should not exceed 24 hours due to the risk of changes in position, either due to sweating or direct intervention by the patient himself.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dry Needling

This. minimally invasive technique is based on the insertion of a sterile, low-caliber, monofilament needle, without the injection or extraction of any additional substances, into hyperirritable muscle nodules. There are two categories within this technique, based on the depth at which the needle is inserted: superficial needling (or the Baldry technique), in which the needle is inserted up to the subcutaneous cellular tissue overlying the myofascial trigger point (up to 10 mm); and deep needling, where the needle is inserted into the muscle with the intention of reaching the myofascial trigger point. Reaching the trigger point was the investigators goal. Regardless of the technique selected, the aim is to generate controlled micro spasms in the affected muscle area, alternating with periods of muscle relaxation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ischemic Compression

Ischemic compression is a conservative, manual technique used on myofascial trigger points, in which pressure should be exerted between 30 and 90 seconds on these same areas. It is suggested that it leads to the normalization of the biomechanical properties of muscle fibers, restoring the muscle\'s functional condition and probably reducing the risk of injury. Thus, the therapeutic effects include the stimulation of mechanoreceptors, with pain attenuation mainly due to the depletion of specific neurotransmitters and temporary obstruction of local blood flow (local ischemia), followed by a rapid influx of oxygenated blood to the area under pressure relief,(37) which will cause an increase in muscle metabolism.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cross Tapes

Cross tapes, as the name implies, based on an equidistant intersection of three or four polyester tapes with a non-elastic adhesive acrylic coating, with the 3 lines oriented in a latero-medial direction. It is recommended that it be applied to the muscle area where the myofascial trigger point has been detected, at a 45º angle to the muscle fibers. Its application may have several purposes, such as muscle support, improving the stability of the fibers; pain relief, especially in areas where muscle tension and/or inflammation are present; aiding lymphatic drainage; promoting blood circulation. Before it is applied, the skin should be clean (disinfecting the area with alcohol) and dry, without any lotion or other ointments and the maximum period of use should not exceed 24 hours due to the risk of changes in position, either due to sweating or direct intervention by the patient himself.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with myofascial pain diagnosed according Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC-TMD).

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Other TMD-spectrum pathologies
* Anticoagulated and antiaggregated individuals
* Diabetes
* Blood disorders
* Fibromyalgia
* Autoimmune diseases in acute stages
* Neurological diseases
* Malignant tumor pathologies
* Patients with aichthyophobia
* Concomitant medication (opioids, antidepressants, myorelaxants)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Coimbra

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bruno Macedo de Sousa

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maria João Rodrigues, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Occlusion and Orofacial Pain, University of Coimbra

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Occlusion and Orofacial Pain, University of Coimbra

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Faculty of Medicine of the University of Salamanca

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Portugal Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMUC-MD-PAIN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.