Effectiveness of Different Methods in Acute Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT04827303
Last Updated: 2021-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
75 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-04-01
2019-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The pain at rest and during movement of the patients in all 3 groups were evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS 10 cm). The number of trigger points was determined by the physician by hand palpation. Pressure pain threshold was evaluated with the algometer device. Disability assessment of the patients was made using the neck pain disability index. evaluations were made at the beginning of treatment, 72 hours after and 1 week after treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dry Needling and Kinesio Taping in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT04521127
Different Taping Methods in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT05879016
Kinesiotaping and Stretching on SKM and Upper Trapezius Muscle in TMD Patients
NCT05481268
Comparison of Efficacy of Dry Needling and Kinesio-taping
NCT04504409
Kinesio Tape Application With EDF Technique on Active Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius Muscle
NCT05405959
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Kinesio taping
A 10-15 cm sized I band was applied to the trapezius muscles of the first group patients with the patient's neck in lateral flexion. Then, while the patient's neck is flexed, a Y-shaped 15-20 cm tape will be affixed between C1-7 with the arms of the Y up, and I tape of 5-10 cm is attached on the arms. In group 2 patients, 1 cc lidocaine diluted with 4 cc saline (SF) was applied to the trigger points palpated manually in the trapezius muscles. After the trigger point was squeezed between the thumb and index finger, a few cc of local anesthetic mixture was applied into the trigger point with the injector and exited. In the 3rd group patients, a few cc local anesthetic mixture will be applied intradermally over the trigger point without entering into the trigger points palpated manually in the trapezius muscles. Patients were checked 72 hours and 1 week after the first applications.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients between the ages of 20-50
* Patients with pain for up to 5 days
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with systemic disease
* Patients with prominent cervical disc herniation
* Patients with cervical arthrosis
* Patients with cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy
* Patients with myofascial trigger point injection in the past 6 months
* Patients who received physical therapy in the past 6 months
* Patients undergoing shoulder and neck surgery
* Patients with drug allergies
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ufuk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Saime Ay
Professor Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
saime ay
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ufuk University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ufuk University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
29032017-8
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.