EFFICACY of USUAL MANAGEMENT of CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC ANO-PERINEAL PAIN by USING LOCAL ANESTHETIC INFILTRATION
NCT ID: NCT06602349
Last Updated: 2024-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-08
2029-03-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions aims to answer are :
1. The efficacy of a posterior perineal block performed under neurostimulation on pain 1 month after local anesthetic infiltration in the treatment of chronic idiopathic ano-perineal pain.
2. The rate of maintenance at 3 months of a positive response to the first infiltration.
3. The pain-free rate at 1 month after the first infiltration.
4. Evolution of quality of life and pain impact between inclusion and one month after the first infiltration.
5. Changes in anxiety and depressive disorders associated with pain between inclusion and one month after the first infiltration.
6. The evolution of symptoms related to central sensitization (both somatic and emotional) between inclusion and one month after the first infiltration.
Participants will :
* be managed with a posterior perineal block of lidocaine or saline solution under neurostimulation.
* complete a questionnaire on pain, anxiety and depression at inclusion and one month after injection of the research product (lidocaine or saline solution).
Researchers will compare between the two treatment arms (lidocaine versus saline solution) to see the rate of patients with a reduction of at least 3 points on a visual analog pain scale between inclusion and 1 month after the first injection.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of the Analgesic Effect of the Perineal Infiltration of Ropivacaine 0.75% Versus Placebo in Post-episiotomy Perineal Pain
NCT03084549
Comparison Of The Analgesia Obtained By Infiltration For The Joinings Of Episiotomies (Liropep)
NCT00727935
Local Infiltration Analgesia With Ropivacaine in Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse:a Randomized, Double-Blind Study
NCT00769054
Pudendal Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Standard Treatment During Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation
NCT03664986
Spinal Anesthesia by Hyperbaric Prilocaine in Day-Case Perianal Surgery
NCT06600048
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Therapeutic management of CDAD is based on 3 treatment strategies of progressively increasing aggressiveness: drug treatment, infiltrations and decompressive surgery.
Drug treatment is based on the empirical use of neuropathic pain medications with proven efficacy in other areas (shingles, diabetes, etc.). Patients are generally considered to be non-responders to drug treatment after failure (decrease in VAS scale \< 3) of at least one antidepressant and one antiepileptic, whose dosages have been brought up to the maximum possible, or in whom a side effect has prevented the dose from being increased to its authorized maximum.
Therapeutic infiltrations most often involve the pudendal nerve (ITNP). Infiltration of the posterior branches of the sacrococcygeal roots is sometimes associated, to create a posterior perineal block (PPB). There is no consensus or recommendation on which molecules to use.
In most studies, a combination of local anesthetics and corticosteroids was used. However, Labat et al published the only randomized controlled trial comparing lidocaine infiltration of the pudendal nerve with or without methylprednisolone. Results were not significantly different (14% vs. 11%).
According to the literature, short-term pain relief up to 3 months was achieved in less than half of patients (11% to 39%) , and at 1 year, pain relief was still present in only around 10% (6.8% to 12.2%) of patients. The only recognized risk factor for failure appears to be the duration of pain (greater than 1 year). Other risk factors have been described in the literature, but only in one study and not in the others such as gender (male or female), age (over or under 70), duration of pain (over or under 1 year), and whether the pain is bilateral or not .
Currently, in our department, patients are treated with lidocaine BPP under neurostimulation. Given the poor results in terms of efficacy and the strong psychological component in chronic pain pathologies, investigators propose in this study to compare our usual management against placebo. Indeed, no type of infiltration has ever been compared to a placebo
-Main objective: evaluate the efficacy of BPP performed under neurostimulation on pain at 1 month after local anesthetic infiltration in the treatment of SCID.
Primary endpoint:
Comparison between the two treatment arms (lidocaine versus saline solution) of the rate of patients with a reduction of at least 3 points on a visual analog pain scale (VAS) between inclusion and 1 month after the first injection.
-Secondary objectives:
Compare between the two treatment arms:
1. 3-month maintenance rate of positive response to first infiltration.
2. Pain-free rate at 1 month after first infiltration.
3. Evolution of quality of life and pain impact between inclusion and one month after the first infiltration.
4. Change in anxiety and depressive disorders associated with pain between inclusion and one month after the first infiltration.
5. The evolution of symptoms related to central sensitization (both somatic and emotional) between inclusion and one month after the first infiltration.
At the end of the interventional phase, patients will be managed according to the department\'s usual procedures. Accepting patients will be included in a follow-up cohort for one year.
Secondary endpoints:
1. Maintenance of positive response at 3 months, defined as a reduction of at least 3 VAS points (compared with inclusion) 3 months after infiltration.
2. Percentage of patients with a VAS score equal to 0 at 1 month after the first infiltration.
3. Delta of the score on question 9 of the modified Concise Pain Questionnaire (CPQ) (French version of the Brief Pain Inventory) concerning the impact of pain .
4. Delta of scores A (anxiety dimension) and D (depression dimension) on the HAD scale
5. Delta of the score for part A of the French version of the CSI central sensitization score
Research procedures Placebo arm: Infiltration by injections of 6mL saline per injection site (left ischial-anal fossa, right ischial-anal fossa, coccyx).
Treatment arm: Infiltration by injections of 6mL lidocaine (10 mg/mL) per injection site (left ischio-anal fossa, right ischio-anal fossa, coccyx).
-Practical research procedure Pre-inclusion visit (D0-min 1 week) Eligible patients will be identified during the proctology consultation. They will be given an information note about the study and will have at least 1 week to think about it before the next consultation.
Inclusion visit and 1st infiltration (D0)
* Verification of inclusion/non-inclusion criteria
* Patient and physician sign consent form.
* Completion of scales and questionnaires (EVA, HAD, QCD, CSI).
* Randomization.
* Infiltration according to randomization arm.
* Collection of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) Visit 1 (D0+1month)
* Collection of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
* Completion of scales and questionnaires (EVA, HAD, QCD, CSI). In the event of a negative response (decrease in VAS of less than 3 points), patients will be managed according to the department\'s routine.
Telephone call: patients with a positive response will be called two months later (i.e. 3 months after infiltration) for a telephone evaluation of VAS. In the event of a VAS increase of more than 2 points, a proctology consultation will be proposed.
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will also be recorded during the telephone call.
End-of-study visit:
* In the event of a negative response (decrease in VAS of less than 3 points), Visit 1 (1 month ±3 days) will correspond to the end-of-study visit;
* If the patient has a positive response, the end-of-study visit will correspond to the telephone visit (3 months +/- 1 week after infiltration).
* Number of patients This is a pilot study in which investigators plan to include 30 patients per arm, for a total of 60 patients.
* Statistical method The rate of successful patients at M1 between the two randomization arms will be analyzed using logistic regression, with treatment success or failure as the explanatory variable and randomization arm and duration of pain (stratification factor) as the explanatory variables.
* Provisional timetable Duration of inclusion period: 60 months Duration of participation of each subject: 3 months Total study duration: 63 months
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
experimental ARMS
treated with lidocaine 10 mg/ml
Lidocaine 10 MG/ML
administration of lidocaine in posterior perineal block infiltration
placebo arm
treated with placebo;salin solution
Saline
administration of salin solution in posterior perineal block infiltration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine 10 MG/ML
administration of lidocaine in posterior perineal block infiltration
Saline
administration of salin solution in posterior perineal block infiltration
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Express consent to participate in the study
* Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security plan
* Presenting chronic idiopathic ano-perineal pain
* MRI normal or without pathology explaining pain (Multidisciplinary consultation meeting reread if in doubt)
* Resistance to \"standard\" 1st-line medical treatment (level 1 or 2 analgesics and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and/or local topicals)
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
* General and/or local infection (fistulous or cutaneous suppuration of anal margin) in progress
* Known neurological pathology that may explain pain
* Psychiatric pathology requiring medication
* Anticoagulants or haemostasis disorders
* Hypersensitivity to lidocaine hydrochloride or local anesthetics
* Recurrent porphyrias
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Axel EGAL
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-001494-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.